| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Etična in pravna spornost pri uporabi tehnik zaslišanja osumljencev - primerjalni pogled : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Pahor, Tara (Author)
ID Flander, Benjamin (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Pahor_Tara_2024.pdf (932,40 KB)
MD5: EDBAA64DC7AAAA70AFF4185C3DAD59D5
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Diplomska naloga se osredotoča na nadvse pomemben del kazenske preiskave, zaslišanje osumljenca. S pomočjo le-tega se izbira informacije od osumljencev, ki so lahko koristne pri preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj. Etika zasliševanja je dolgo veljala za sivo območje kazenskega pravosodja, vendar z naraščanjem kritičnosti javnosti do pridobitve lažnih priznanj tega sivega območja ni več mogoče prezreti. Pri zaslišanju se uporablja več tehnik, pri tem pa so najbolj aktualne prisilne oz. manipulativne zasliševalske tehnike, kot je na primer Reidova, ki se uporablja v ZDA. Naprednejši način komunikacije z osumljencem predstavlja metoda kognitivnega intervjuja. Iz literature je mogoče razbrati, da so bile v preteklosti prisilne zasliševalske tehnike standard za zbiranje podatkov o kaznivih dejanjih. Z njihovo pomočjo so preiskovalci pridobili priznanje osumljenca in posledično razrešili primer. S takim razumevanjem prava in opravičevanjem tehnik in načinov zasliševanja, pri katerih je bil važen samo končni rezultat – pridobitev priznanja, so bile zaslišanim posameznikom pogosto kršene temeljne pravice. Ta način zaslišanja osumljencev naj bi s spremembami pravne ureditve in prizadevanjem za varovanje človekovih pravic v nekaterih demokratičnih državah postopoma poskušali izkoreniniti. Pobudo za izboljšave pa gre pripisati bodisi mnogim mednarodnim konvencijam, ki ustanavljajo razne odbore kot nadzorne mehanizme izvajanja državljanskih in političnih pravic, bodisi delovanju medijev, s pomočjo katerih se v javnosti sproža ogorčenje nad nepravilnim ravnanjem.
Keywords:kazenske preiskave, tehnike zaslišanja, osumljenci, pravna spornost, etična spornost, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:T. Pahor
Year of publishing:2024
Year of performance:2024
Number of pages:IV f., [46] str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-90036 New window
UDC:347.939(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:209217283 New window
Publication date in DKUM:27.09.2024
Views:0
Downloads:34
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
PAHOR, Tara, 2024, Etična in pravna spornost pri uporabi tehnik zaslišanja osumljencev - primerjalni pogled : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Ljubljana : T. Pahor. [Accessed 27 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=90036
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Searching for similar works...Please wait....
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:21.08.2024

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Ethical and legal controversy in using different suspect interrogation techniques - a comparative view
Abstract:The thesis focuses on an extremely important part of the criminal investigation process, forensic interrogation. With it, we collect information about the suspects and the crime in question. The ethics of interrogation has long been considered a gray area in criminal justice and with growing public skepticism about obtaining false confessions, it can no longer be overlooked. Several techniques are used during interrogation the most current ones are coercive or manipulative interrogation techniques, such as Reid's, which is used in the USA, and the cognitive interview method, which represents a more advanced way of communicating with the suspect. Literature shows that in the past coercive interrogation techniques were the standard for gathering information about crimes. With their help, a confession was obtained by investigators from the suspect which later contributed to solving the case. The justification of these interrogation techniques and methods, where only the end result of obtaining a confession was important, the fundamental rights of the individuals being interrogated were often violated. A gradual eradication through changes in the legal system and efforts to secure human rights is desired. The impetus for improvement, however, can be attributed either to the many international conventions that set up various committees as control mechanisms for the exercise of civil and political rights, or to the actions of the media, which provoke outrage in the public at the misconduct.
Keywords:ethical controversy, legal controversy, interrogation technique, human rights, suspects


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica