| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Varstvo okolja v sodni praksi evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Planinšek, Jaka (Author)
ID Ferčič, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Planinsek_Jaka_2024.pdf (1,23 MB)
MD5: B2DE5172D9CA6FB04A2714EDD86C8236
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V luči poglabljajoče se podnebne krize, ki predstavlja osrednji izziv današnjega časa, se povečuje pogostnost postopka pred Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice (ESČP) za dosego ciljev zaščite in varstva okolja. Gre za še en poskus uporabe orodja mednarodnega prava, ki se do sedaj ni izkazalo kot pretirano učinkovito sredstvo za zaščito našega planeta pred čezmernim izkoriščanjem in degradacijo naravnega temelja za življenje. Vsi razpoložljivi znanstveni podatki namreč kažejo, da se stanje okolja poslabšuje in da v boju proti podnebnim spremembam izgubljamo. Uporaba postopka pred ESČP za namene varstva okolja temelji na neizpodbitni povezavi med človekovimi pravicami in okoljem, ki je bila v kakem mednarodnem pravnem aktu prvič omenjena leta 1972, ko je bila sprejeta Stockholmska deklaracija. Povsem jasno je, da brez zdravega in čistega okolja ne moremo v celoti uživati nekaterih človekovih pravic, ki nam jih podeljuje Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic (EKČP). Ravno sklicevanje na obstoječe človekove pravice v EKČP, kot sta pravica do življenja in pravica do zdravja, predstavlja podlago za varstvo okolja skozi postopek pred ESČP. Pritožniki pred ESČP namreč zatrjujejo, da je do kršitev njihovih človekovih pravic prišlo zaradi nedovoljenih posegov v okolje. ESČP je do danes odločilo v številnih primerih, povezanih z okoljem, in pri odločanju uporabilo temeljna načela, kot so previdnostno načelo, načelo trajnostnega razvoja in doktrina proste presoje. Kljub obsežni in poglobljeni sodni praksi na področju okolja pa narava postopka pred ESČP predvsem zaradi svoje antropocentrične perspektive močno omejuje učinkovitost varstva, saj je v primerih, ko škode ne utrpi človek, ampak le okolje, slednje praktično nevarovano. Varstvo okolja dalje pomembno omejujejo tudi občasna nedoslednost sodne prakse in neučinkovite sankcije, ki kršiteljev ne potisnejo v smer proti ustreznim spremembam.
Keywords:varstvo okolja, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, antropocentrično varstvo, zdravo življenjsko okolje, podnebne spremembe, onesnaževanje, prosta presoja, subsidiarnost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:J. Planinšek
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (71 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-89676-350f036d-caf1-8b5a-3b24-19c0a7f2f3e8 New window
UDC:349.6:341.645.5(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:206253315 New window
Publication date in DKUM:04.09.2024
Views:46
Downloads:47
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
PLANINŠEK, Jaka, 2024, Varstvo okolja v sodni praksi evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice : magistrsko delo [online]. Master’s thesis. Maribor : J. Planinšek. [Accessed 22 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=89676
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:03.08.2024

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Environment protection in case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Abstract:In the light of the worsening of the climate crisis, which represents the central challenge of our time the trend of using the procedure before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to achieve the goals of environmental protection is increasing. It represents another attempt to utilize the tools of international law, which so far have not proven to be an overly effective means of protecting our planet from over-exploitation and the resulting degradation of the natural foundation for life. All available scientific data show that the state of the environment is deteriorating and that we are losing the fight against climate change. The use of the procedure before the ECtHR for the purpose of environmental protection is based on the undeniable connection between human rights and the environment, which was first mentioned in an international legal act in 1972, when the Stockholm Declaration was signed. It is quite clear that without a healthy and clean environment we cannot fully enjoy some of the human rights granted to us by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The reference to existing human rights in the ECHR, such as the right to life and the right to health, constitutes the basis for environmental protection using ECtHR. Namely, the applicants claim before the ECHR that their human rights were violated due to unauthorized actions that affected the environment. To date, the ECHR has ruled in numerous cases related to the environment and has applied fundamental principles such as the precautionary principle, the principle of sustainable development and the doctrine of margin of appreciation. Despite extensive and in-depth case law in the field of the environment, the effectiveness of the procedure before the ECtHR, is severely limited, mainly due to its anthropocentric perspective, as the environment is practically unprotected in cases where the damage is not suffered by humans but only by the environment. Environmental protection is further significantly compromised by the occasional inconsistency of judicial practice and ineffective sanctions that do not persuade the violators to make appropriate changes.
Keywords:environmental protection, European Court of Human Rights, anthropocentric protection, healthy living environment, climate change, pollution, margin of appreciation, subsidiarity


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica