| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Primerjava potresne analize zidane stavbe z linearno elastičnim in nelinearnim modelom v programih Tower 8 in SCIA Engineer 21 : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Andrašek, Dubravko (Author)
ID Kuhta, Milan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Premrov, Miroslav (Comentor)
ID Vilotijević, Jelena (Comentor)
Files:.pdf MAG_Andrasek_Dubravko_2024.pdf (9,83 MB)
MD5: 64D2536D39312C971DF7E3C4D7586390
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
Abstract:Magistrsko delo se osredotoča predvsem na primerjalno potresno analizo zidane stavbe z linearno in nelinearno analizo. Potresna naliza je bila izvedena s programsko opremo Tower 8 in SCIA Engineer 21. Parametri, ki smo jih primerjali, vključujejo potek notranjih statičnih obremenitev, skupne pomike in togost celotne konstrukcije. Pomembno je omeniti, da so bili rezultati primerjani le za določene stene. Ugotovili smo, da Tower 8 pokaže padec notranjih statičnih obremenitev pri stiku navpičnih nosilnih elementov, medtem ko smo s programsko opremo SCIA Enginee 21r dobili bolj kritične rezultate. Prav tako smo opazili, da Tower 8 ne omogoča izvedbe nelinearne analize za ploskovne elemente. SCIA Engineer 21 omogoča nelinearno analizo, vendar le z uporabo kvazistatičnega pristopa, ki prinaša bistveno bolj kritične rezultate. Dodatno smo z linearno analizo v programskem paketu Tower 8 primerjali rezultate potresne analize na dveh dodatnih modelih. Prvi model je upošteval parapete in preklade pri modeliranju, medtem ko je drugi model vključeval zmanjšano vrednost modula elastičnosti.
Keywords:potresna analiza, Tower 8, SCIA Engineer 21, linearna analiza, nelinearna analiza, zidana stavba
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:[D. Andrašek]
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (XIV,108 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-88484 New window
UDC:624.012.042.7(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:200292867 New window
Publication date in DKUM:30.05.2024
Views:193
Downloads:120
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FG
:
ANDRAŠEK, Dubravko, 2024, Primerjava potresne analize zidane stavbe z linearno elastičnim in nelinearnim modelom v programih Tower 8 in SCIA Engineer 21 : magistrsko delo [online]. Master’s thesis. Maribor : D. Andrašek. [Accessed 10 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=88484
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:06.05.2024

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of seismic analysis of a masonry building with linear-elastic and non-linear models in tower 8 and scia engineer 21
Abstract:The master's thesis primarily deals with the comparison of seismic analysis on a masonry structure using linear and nonlinear analysis. The seismic analysis was conducted using the software Tower 8 and SCIA Engineer 21. The results, or parameters we compared, include the internal static load paths, total displacements, and structural stiffness. It's important to note that the results were compared on specific walls only. We found that Tower 8 experiences a drop in the shear force at the junction of vertical load-bearing elements, unlike the SCIA Engineer software, which provides more critical results. We also noted that Tower 8 cannot perform nonlinear analyses for planar elements. SCIA Engineer 21 can perform nonlinear analyses but only with a quasi-static approach, yielding significantly more critical results. In addition, based on the linear analysis from Tower 8, we compared the results of seismic analysis with two additional models. The first model considers parapets and spandrels during modeling, while the second model recalculates with a reduced elastic modulus.
Keywords:earthquake analysis, Tower 8, SCIA Engineer 21, linear analysis, nonlinear analysis, masonry structure


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica