| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Primerjava stališč učencev in učiteljev do številčnih ocen : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Hauptman, Hajdi (Author)
ID Kovač, Jernej (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Hauptman_Hajdi_2023.pdf (1,64 MB)
MD5: 99ED6228E047B02CF84657128ADC2B21
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Magistrska naloga se osredotoča na raziskovanje stališč in mnenj učencev ter učiteljev glede uporabe številčnih ocen v šolskem sistemu. Ocenjevanje s številčnimi ocenami je pomemben del izobraževalnega sistema, saj meri dosežke učencev in vpliva na njihovo motivacijo, samopodobo in odnos do učenja. Kljub temu se pojavljajo vprašanja in dileme glede uporabe številčnih ocen, zato je namen magistrske naloge raziskati, kako jih učenci in učitelji dojemajo, kakšno vrednost jim pripisujejo ter kakšen vpliv imajo na učenje, poučevanje, motivacijo in počutje. Naloga je sestavljena iz teoretičnega in empiričnega dela. V teoretičnem delu so predstavljeni osnovni teoretični okvirji ocenjevanja ter osnove ocenjevanja v slovenskem šolskem sistemu, medtem ko se empirični del osredotoča na analizo in primerjavo stališč učencev ter učiteljev glede številčnih ocen. Za zbiranje podatkov je bil uporabljen anketni vprašalnik, ki je vključeval vprašanja o namenu ocenjevanja, verodostojnosti številčnih ocen, številu ocen v enem šolskem letu in subjektivnosti pri ocenjevanju. V raziskavi je sodelovalo 117 učencev in 133 učiteljev, podatki pa so bili analizirani s pomočjo deskriptivne in kavzalno-neeksperimentalne metode raziskovanja. Primerjava mnenj med učenci in učitelji glede številčnega ocenjevanja ni razkrila izrazitih razlik, saj so učenci in učitelji pri svojih stališčih do številčnega ocenjevanja v veliki meri skladni, vendar smo kljub temu prišli do zanimivih spoznanj. Ugotovili smo, da učenci dojemajo ocenjevanje tudi kot ustrahovanje in discipliniranje, medtem ko so mnenja do številčnih ocen kot realnega pokazatelja znanja števila ocen, ki jih je treba pridobiti v enem šolskem letu kar razdeljena – tako pri učencih, kot tudi pri učiteljih. Nadalje smo ugotovili, da tako učitelji, kot učenci raje vidijo številčno ocenjevanje kot opisno. Nazadnje smo dobili vpogled v mnenja o pravičnosti ocenjevanja. Ugotovili smo, da so učenci z zadostnim in odličnim učnih uspehom mnenja, da učitelji ocenjujejo pravično, medtem ko učenci z dobrim in prav dobrim uspehom temu nasprotujejo.  
Keywords:ocenjevanje znanja, številčne ocene, osnovnošolci, učitelji, pravičnost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:H. Hauptman
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (IX, 83 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-84954 New window
UDC:37.091.279.7(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:163692547 New window
Publication date in DKUM:07.09.2023
Views:376
Downloads:102
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
HAUPTMAN, Hajdi, 2023, Primerjava stališč učencev in učiteljev do številčnih ocen : magistrsko delo [online]. Master’s thesis. Maribor : H. Hauptman. [Accessed 26 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=84954
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
Licensing start date:10.08.2023

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:A comparison of students' and teachers' views on numeric grades
Abstract:The master's thesis focuses on researching the opinions of students and teachers regarding numeric assessments. Such assessment plays an important part in the education system, as it measures the achievements of students and affects their motivation, self-image and attitude to learning. Nevertheless, there are questions and dilemmas regarding the use of numeric grades, so the purpose of the master's thesis is to examine how students and teachers perceive numeric grades, what value they attribute to them and what impact they have on learning, teaching, motivation and well-being. The thesis consists of a theoretical and an empirical part. The theoretical part presents the basic theoretical frameworks of assessment and the basics of assessment in the Slovene school system, while the empirical part focuses on the analysis and comparison of the attitudes of students and teachers. A questionnaire was used to collect data, which included questions about the purpose of assessment, the credibility of numeric assessments, the number of assessments in one school year, and subjectivity in assessment. 117 students and 133 teachers participated in the research, and the data was analysed using descriptive and causal-non-experimental research methods. A comparison of the opinions of students and teachers regarding numeric assessment did not reveal significant differences, as students and teachers are largely consistent in their attitudes, but we nevertheless obtained some interesting insights. We have found that students perceive assessment as intimidation and disciplining, while opinions regarding numeric grades as a realistic indicator of knowledge and of the number of grades that need to be acquired in a school year are quite divided among both students and teachers. Furthermore, we found that both teachers and students prefer numeric assessment to descriptive. Finally, we got an insight into the opinions about the fairness of assessment. We have found that students with sufficient and excellent academic performance think that teachers evaluate fairly, while students with good and very good performance believe the contrary.
Keywords:knowledge assessment, numeric grades, primary school learners, teachers, fairness


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica