Vstavljanje urinskega katetra pri ženski v urgentni dejavnosti: primerjava usposobljenosti med zdravstvenimi delavci

Kropec, Jan

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Vstavljanje urinskega katetra pri ženski v urgentni dejavnosti: primerjava usposobljenosti med zdravstvenimi delavci
Authors:	ID Kropec, Jan (Author) ID Strnad, Matej (Mentor) More about this mentor... ID Fekonja, Zvonka (Comentor)
Files:	VS_Kropec_Jan_2022.pdf (1,17 MB) MD5: FB56002D3F5C7015529D50B9AEE1F67D
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:	V diplomskem delu smo predstavili vstavljanje trajnega urinskega katetra pri ženski ter s pomočjo vprašalnika in ocenjevalnega lista ugotavljali raven znanja zdravstvenega osebja v urgentnem centru. Pri izdelavi zaključnega dela smo uporabili deskriptivno metodo raziskovanja s pregledom teoretičnih izhodišč izbrane literature. Pri kvantitativnem delu smo kot glavni instrument uporabili anketni vprašalnik. Pri kvalitativnem delu raziskovalne naloge smo izvedli opazovanje, pri katerem smo uporabili etnografsko metodo. V raziskavi so sodelovali medicinske sestre in tudi zdravniki. S pomočjo anketnega vprašalnika smo ugotovili, da je samoocena delavcev visoka. Pri opazovanju praktičnega dela smo pa dejansko ugotovili napake, ki se največkrat pojavljajo glede na protokol tako pri zdravnikih kot tudi pri medicinskih sestrah. Pri zdravnikih je bil največkrat neopravljen korak ureditev pacientke po opravljeni kateterizaciji, in sicer v 33 % (n = 5). Medicinske sestre pa izstopajo po tem, da se ne predstavijo pacientki pred kateterizacijo, in sicer v 40 % (n = 6). V povprečju so udeleženci v našem vzorcu odgovorili pravilno na 68,1 % vprašanj, zdravniki so v povprečju pravilno odgovorili na 69,1 % vprašanj, medicinske sestre pa na 67,6 % vprašanj. Na podlagi izpolnjenih anket in opazovanj smo ugotovili, da obstajajo razlike med protokolom in dejansko izvedbo v praksi v urgentnem centru med zdravstvenimi izvajalci. Ugotovili smo tudi razliko med postopkom vstavljanja urinskega katetra med zdravniki in medicinskimi sestrami.
Keywords:	kateterizacija, urgenca, zdravnik, medicinska sestra
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[J. Kropec]
Year of publishing:	2022
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-83423
UDC:	616-089.819.1:616-083.98(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	137694723
Publication date in DKUM:	25.01.2023
Views:	734
Downloads:	136
Metadata:
Categories:	FZV
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:	This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:	22.11.2022

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Inserting an indwelling urinary catheter into a female patient in the emergency department: a comparison of skills among health care professionals
Abstract:	In the thesis, we presented the insertion of a permanent urinary catheter in a female patient. With the help of a questionnaire and an evaluation sheet we also determined the level of knowledge of the medical staff in the emergency center. In the preparation of the final work, we used a descriptive research method with an overview of the theoretical starting points of the selected literature. In the quantitative work, we used a survey questionnaire as the main instrument. In the qualitative part of the research task, we carried out observation using the ethnographic method. Nurses as well as doctors participated in the research. With the help of a questionnaire, we found that the self-evaluation grade of workers is high. During the observation of the practical work, we actually found errors which most often occur according to the protocol both with doctors and nurses. The most frequently undone step by doctors was the arrangement of the patient after the catheterization, namely in 33% (n = 5). Nurses stand out in that they do not introduce themselves to the patient before catheterization, i.e. 40% (n = 6). On average, the participants in our sample answered 68.1% of the questions correctly, doctors answered 69.1% of the questions correctly and nurses answered 67.6% of the questions correctly. Based on completed surveys and observations, we found out that there are differences between the protocol and the actual implementation of practice at the emergency center among medical staff. We also found a difference between the procedure of inserting a urinary catheter between doctors and nurses.
Keywords:	catheterization, emergency, doctor, nurse

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back