| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Celostno vrednotenje življenjskega cikla embalaže za paradižnik iz vidika vplivov na okolje : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa
Authors:ID Purešević, Nika (Author)
ID Kovačič Lukman, Rebeka (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Krajnc, Damjan (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UN_Puresevic_Nika_2022.pdf (2,25 MB)
MD5: B45284851C098A3AC8FEDD054DDCF92F
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FL - Faculty of Logistic
Abstract:Ta naloga predstavlja celovito oceno življenjskega cikla embalaže za paradižnik iz vidika vplivov na okolje. V nalogi so analizirane štiri različne plastične embalaže za paradižnik – polipropilenska folija, polipropilenska vrečka kombinirana s kartonsko škatlo iz valovitega recikliranega papirja, navadna plastična vrečka iz polietilena nizke gostote in škatla iz recikliranega polietilena tereftalata. Analizo vrednotenja življenjskega cikla smo izvedli z uporabo programskega orodja Open LCA in CML Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden, metodo za vrednotenje vplivov. Rezultati so pokazali, da imata procesa proizvodnje plastične embalaže in kartonske škatle največji vpliv na okolje. Gledano skozi celoten življenjski cikel, predstavlja R PET škatla najslabšo možnost za izbiro embalaže, saj ima vpliv na večino okoljskih kazalcev izrazitejši, v primerjavi z drugimi embalažami. LDPE in PP vrečka nista tako sporni za okolje, kot pa R PET škatla ali celo sestavljena embalaža iz PP folije in kartonske škatle. Vse embalaže pa dosegajo največje vplive na okolje v kategoriji globalnega segrevanja ozračja.
Keywords:življenjski cikel, plastična embalaža, polipropilen, reciklirani polietilen tereftalat, polietilen nizke gostote, vpliv na okolje
Place of publishing:Celje
Place of performance:Celje
Publisher:[N. Purešević]
Year of publishing:2022
Number of pages:IV, 56 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-83253-838a4bd4-7ca6-6578-150b-fa0885f69d2c New window
UDC:621.798:635.64:502.12(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:137830915 New window
Publication date in DKUM:16.01.2023
Views:693
Downloads:69
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FL
:
PUREŠEVIĆ, Nika, 2022, Celostno vrednotenje življenjskega cikla embalaže za paradižnik iz vidika vplivov na okolje : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Celje : N. Purešević. [Accessed 23 March 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=83253
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:06.10.2022

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:A life cycle assessment of tomato packaging
Abstract:This assignment, however presents a comprehensive assessment of tomato packaging life cycle and its impacts on environment. The assignment shows analysis of four different plastic packagings for tomatoes - polypropylene film, polypropylene bag combined with a cardboard box made of corrugated recycled paper, a plain low-density polyethylene plastic bag and a recycled polyethylene terephthalate box.The analysis of the assessment of the life cycle was done using OpenLCA software and CML - Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden, method of impact assessment. The results show that both, the production process of plastic packaging and the production process of a cardboard box have the biggest environmental impact. Taking into account the entire life cycle, the R PET box presents the worst choice of packaging. In comparison to other packagings, it has more pronounced impact on most environmental indicators. LDPE and PP bags present less of a threat to environment in contrast to the R PET box or a composite packaging made of PP film and cardboard box. All four different tomato packagings reach the biggest environmental impacts in category of causing global warming.
Keywords:life cycle, plastic packaging, polypropylene, recycled polyethylene, terephthalate, low density polyethylene, environmental impact


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica