| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Privilegij zoper samoobtožbo kot ahilova peta sekcijskega merjenja hitrosti
Authors:ID Polajžar, Aljoša (Author)
ID Stajnko, Jan (Author)
Files:URL https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2020-2/02_Polajzar_Stajnko_rV-2020-2.html
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Namen prispevka: Namen prispevka je poiskati rešitev za učinkovito delovanje sekcijskega merjenja hitrosti, ki bi bilo skladno s privilegijem zoper samoobtožbo, kot je ta razumljen v pravnem redu Republike Slovenije. Metode: Prispevek povezuje področja ustavnega in kaznovalnega prava. Za namene raziskave so uporabljene dogmatsko-normativna, jezikovna, formalno-logična in aksiološka metoda, v povezavi z ustaljenimi metodami razlage zakonskega besedila oziroma argumentacije v pravu. Ugotovitve: V prispevku je ugotovljeno, da nov predlog za spremembo zakonodaje ne bo odpravil težav sekcijskega merjenja hitrosti. Prilagodljivost pravnega urejanja preprečuje velikodušna zasnova privilegija zoper samoodločbo, kot je ta opredeljen v Ustavi Republike Slovenije. Zaradi tega velja razmisliti o novih tehničnih rešitvah, ki bi omogočale učinkovit nadzor hitrosti in hkrati ne bi omejevale temeljnih pravic. Omejitve raziskave Raziskava se omeji na prekrškovnopravne razsežnosti problematike sekcijskega merjenja hitrosti. Predlagane tehnične rešitve je v tem smislu treba ovrednotiti tudi iz zornega kota varovanja osebnih podatkov in gole tehnične izvedljivosti. Praktična uporabnost: Večkrat je bilo poudarjeno, da se sekcijsko merjenje hitrosti v Sloveniji ne bi obneslo zaradi neučinkovite zakonodaje. Prispevek se sooči s takšnimi trditvami, jih osmisli in poda smernice, v skladu s katerimi bi v prihodnje sekcijsko merjenje hitrosti vendarle lahko zaživelo. Izvirnost/pomembnost prispevka: Izvirnost prispevka se kaže v kritični obravnavi predlogov za izboljšanje zakonodaje na področju sekcijskega merjenja hitrosti. Nadalje se soočimo s sodbama Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v zadevah O`Halloran in Francis proti Veliki Britaniji in Weh proti Avstriji ter obrazloženo argumentiramo, zakaj nista neposredno uporabljivi v domačem pravnem redu. Nazadnje je na podlagi ugotovitev podan predlog tehnične rešitve, s katero bi obšli težave neučinkovitosti sekcijskega merjenja zaradi dometa privilegija zoper samoobtožbo.
Keywords:privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, merjenje hitrosti, promet, varnost, prekrški, pravo
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2020
Number of pages:str. 137-157
Numbering:Letn. 22, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-78012 New window
UDC:343.232:351.81
ISSN on article:1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:30631683 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:VB6P82L6
Publication date in DKUM:02.10.2020
Views:1372
Downloads:65
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
POLAJŽAR, Aljoša and STAJNKO, Jan, 2020, Privilegij zoper samoobtožbo kot ahilova peta sekcijskega merjenja hitrosti. [online]. 2020. Vol. 22, no. 2, p. 137–157. [Accessed 8 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2020-2/02_Polajzar_Stajnko_rV-2020-2.html
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:02.10.2020

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Privilege against self-incrimination as the achilles' heel of section control
Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this contribution is to find a solution to ensure effective functioning of section control which would be compatible with the privilege against self-incrimination in Slovene legal system. Design/Methods/Approach: This contribution touches upon the fields of constitutional and punitive law. Dogmatic-normative, linguistic, formal logic and axiological methods are used and connected with methods of interpretation in law. Findings: It was found that the legislative proposal does not amend legal issues in connection to section control. The scope of possible legal amendments is limited by a broad understanding of the privilege against self-incrimination in Slovene constitution. It, therefore, seems more plausible to search for technical instead of legal solutions. Research Limitations / Implications: This contribution is limited to punitive (minor offence or misdemeanour) law. Further research on effective technical solutions as well as the protection of personal data is needed. Practical Implications: It was argued many times that section control is not plausible in Slovenia because of inefficient legislation. This contribution addresses and gives meaning to these superficial claims. It further provides solutions and argues that section control is nonetheless feasible in Slovenia. Originality/Value: The added value of this contribution is apparent since it critically evaluates the recent legislative proposal. It furthermore analyses arguments of the ECHR in cases O’Halloran and Francis vs Great Britain as well as Weh vs Austria and shows why these precedents are not applicable in Slovene legal system. Lastly, a suggestion is made that by introducing new technical solutions, section control could be feasible and compatible with the privilege against self-incrimination.
Keywords:self-incrimination, section control, speed camera, misdemeanour, minor offences, law


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Varstvoslovje

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica