| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Mednarodno kazensko sodišče in neodvisna preiskava (študija primerov) : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Bulovec, Luka (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Bulovec_Luka_2018.pdf (1,70 MB)
MD5: 6BD4680051A8FB30D9A1FD9288530E08
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/823d4654-9a75-4929-885f-9e099c7f92e5
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Mednarodno kazensko sodišče nima lastnih preiskovalcev v smislu naddržavne policije s polnimi pooblastili za preiskavo kaznivih dejanj v svoji pristojnosti. Pri pridobivanju informacij, preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj in pregonu njihovih storilcev je močno odvisno od sodelovanja držav, različnih mednarodnih in nevladnih organizacij in drugih zunanjih virov. S študijo različnih odločitev, ki jih Mednarodno kazensko sodišče sprejema v okviru svojega dela, poskušam ugotoviti, kako ti s svojim sodelovanjem ali nesodelovanjem vplivajo na preiskavo, pregon in nadaljnje odločitve Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča v kazenskem postopku. Kako njihovo sodelovanje ali nesodelovanje vpliva na delo preiskovalcev Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča. Kakšne dokaze lahko pridobijo in kako močni so. In vpliv, ki ga imajo različne okoliščine in dejanja preiskovalcev na njihovo dopustnost in dokazno vrednost. Kako Mednarodno kazensko sodišče poskuša zmanjšati njihov vpliv na preiskavo in nadaljnje odločitve in kakšne možnosti ima za uveljavljanje svojih odločitev v praksi. Z nadaljnjo primerjavo s podobnimi primeri in odločitvami iz prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ugotavljam, ali imajo ta dejanja in okoliščine v preiskavi podobne posledice za kazenski postopek pred Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem, kot bi ga imela, če bi bile njegove odločitve podvržene presoji Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice. In kako se njihova preiskava ujema z zahtevami za neodvisno preiskavo, ki jih je s svojo prakso določilo Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice. V zaključku povzamem bistvene ugotovitve in na njihovi podlagi predlagam nekaj rešitev, ki bi lahko povečale možnost izvedbe uspešne neodvisne preiskave kaznivih dejanj v pristojnosti Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča.
Keywords:magistrska dela, mednarodno kazensko sodišče, rimski statut, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic, preiskava
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[L. Bulovec]
Year of publishing:2018
Year of performance:2018
Number of pages:VII, 106 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-72713 New window
UDC:343.1:342.59(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3640554 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:MGL0SLMC
Publication date in DKUM:10.12.2018
Views:1645
Downloads:219
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
BULOVEC, Luka, 2018, Mednarodno kazensko sodišče in neodvisna preiskava (študija primerov) : magistrsko delo [online]. Master’s thesis. Ljubljana : L. Bulovec. [Accessed 27 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=72713
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The International Criminal Court and independent investigation (case study)
Abstract:The International Criminal Court does not have its own investigators in terms of supra-national police with full powers to investigate criminal offenses within its jurisdiction. In obtaining information, investigating criminal offenses and prosecuting their perpetrators, it strongly depends on the participation of countries, various international and non-governmental organizations and other external sources. By studying various decisions taken by the International Criminal Court in the course of their work, I am trying to find out how, through their cooperation or non-cooperation, they influence the investigation, prosecution and subsequent decisions of the International Criminal Court in criminal proceedings. How their cooperation or non-cooperation affects the work of the investigators of the International Criminal Court. What evidence can they gain and how strong they are. And the impact that different circumstances and acts of investigators have on their admissibility and evidential value. How does the International Criminal Court attempt to reduce their influence on the investigation and subsequent decisions and what options it has in place to enforce its decisions. By continuing to compare with similar cases and decisions from the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, I determine whether these acts and the circumstances of the investigation have similar consequences for the criminal proceedings before the International Criminal Court, as would have been, if its decisions were subject to the assessment of the European Court of Human Rights. And how their investigation matches the requirements for an independent investigation, which the European Court of Human Rights has established with their practice. In conclusion, I summarize the substantive findings and, on the basis of them, I propose some solutions that could increase the possibility of conducting a successful independent investigation of criminal offenses under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
Keywords:International Criminal Court, Rome Statute, European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, investigation


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica