Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
|
|
SLO
|
ENG
|
Cookies and privacy
DKUM
EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
FE - Faculty of Energy Technology
FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
FF - Faculty of Arts
FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
FL - Faculty of Logistic
FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
FT - Faculty of Tourism
FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
MF - Faculty of Medicine
PEF - Faculty of Education
PF - Faculty of Law
UKM - University of Maribor Library
UM - University of Maribor
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
COBISS
Faculty of Business and Economic, Maribor
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Maribor
Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Krško
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj
Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, Ljubljana
Faculty of Health Sciences
Library of Technical Faculties, Maribor
Faculty of Medicine, Maribor
Miklošič Library FPNM, Maribor
Faculty of Law, Maribor
University of Maribor Library
Bigger font
|
Smaller font
Introduction
Search
Browsing
Upload document
For students
For employees
Statistics
Login
First page
>
Show document
Show document
Title:
Razvoj in primerjava služnosti v rimskem in modernem času
Authors:
ID
Makari, Maja
(Author)
ID
Vrenčur, Renato
(Mentor)
More about this mentor...
Files:
UN_Makari_Maja_2018.pdf
(909,67 KB)
MD5: 478F70ACA59D4A0C3FC452FF55D8EE67
PID:
20.500.12556/dkum/780c03f2-ae97-4fef-aba7-b7835e78f8f0
Language:
Slovenian
Work type:
Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:
PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:
Služnost so poznali že rimljani. Zanimalo nas je, kako je urejena v modernem času, od ODZ, ZTLR vse do SPZ. Če se primerjata SPZ in ZTLR ugotovimo, da je bilo le malo razlik. Večina razlik je v nomotehnični uredivi, predvsem da so stvari strnjene v istih členih ali so razdeljene na več odstavkov, posebnih členov. Črtanih členov je malo, Največje razlike so, da ne obstaja več družbena lastnina, kar je pravzaprav odvisno od ustavne ureditve na kateri slonijo zakoni, dodana je neprava stvarna služnost, ureditev v istem zakonu – stvarne in osebne služnosti so urejene v SPZ. V času uporabe ZTLR se je za osebne služnosti uporabljal prejšnji zakon, ODZ. Največja razlika, razen ureditve v skupnem zakonu je to, da je prej obstajala služnost stanovanja, ki je lahko bila ustanovljena kot raba ali užitek. Od tega je bil odvisen obseg upravičenj. SPZ obravnava služnost stanovanja kot posebno služnost. Preseneča pa dejstvo, da so se je tekom vsega tega dolgega obdobja pravila bolj malo spreminjala. Rimsko pravo je postavilo izvrstne temelje, na katerih še danes sloni moderna ureditev. Temeljna načela veljajo še danes. Poznali so zemljiške in osebne služnosti. Že rimljani so imeli razvite kompleksne pravne institute v zvezi s služnostjo. Pravno varstvo je bilo urejeno. Največje razlike so opazne pri načinih ustanovitve in prenehanja. Večinoma je bil način mancipacija ali in iure cessio. Ta dva pravna instituta današnje pravo ne pozna več. Prav tako moderno pravo ne pozna nekaterih služnosti, na primer služnost dela tujih sužnjev in živine.
Keywords:
Služnost
,
primerjava
,
razvoj
,
ZTLR
,
ODZ
,
rimski čas
Place of publishing:
Maribor
Publisher:
[M. Makari]
Year of publishing:
2018
PID:
20.500.12556/DKUM-72305
UDC:
347.26(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:
5640235
NUK URN:
URN:SI:UM:DK:SDG1B8FH
Publication date in DKUM:
21.09.2018
Views:
1213
Downloads:
190
Metadata:
Categories:
PF
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
MAKARI, Maja, 2018,
Razvoj in primerjava služnosti v rimskem in modernem času
[online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Maribor : M. Makari. [Accessed 23 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=72305
Copy citation
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:
Voting is allowed only for
logged in
users.
Share:
Similar works from our repository:
Pogosta vprašanja v paliativni oskrbi
Podpora svojcem v paliativni oskrbi
Pomen svojcev v paliativni oskrbi in oskrbi v hospicu
Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer
Vloga zagovorništva v paliativni oskrbi
Similar works from other repositories:
Urgentna stanja v paliativni oskrbi
Alternativni in komplementarni načini obvladovanja kronične bolezni v paliativni oskrbi
Ocena osveščenosti laične populacije o paliativni oskrbi
Lajšanje bolečine v paliativni oskrbi z glasbo: prikaz dobrih praks
Komunikacija v paliativni oskrbi
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:
The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:
18.09.2018
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Comparison and development of easement in the roman and modern times
Abstract:
Romans already knew the easement. We were interested in how it is regulated in modern times, from ODZ, ZTLR to SPZ. If we compare SPZ and ZTLR, we find that there were only a few differences. Most of the differences are in nomotechnical edits, in particular that things are compact in the same articles or are divided into several paragraphs, specific articles. The deleted articles are only few, the biggest differences are that there is no longer social property, which is in fact dependent on the constitutional order on which the laws are based, the quasi property easement was developted, arranged in the same law - real and personal easements are regulated in the SPZ. While the ZTLR, the former law, was in use, ODZ was used for personal easements. The biggest difference, with the exception of the regulation in a joint law, is that there was formerly the easement of a dwelling that could have been established as a usus or ususfructus. The extent of the entitlements was dependent on this. SPZ treats the easement of the apartment as a special easement. It is surprising, however, that the rules have changed slightly over the course of this long period. Roman law set up excellent foundations on which today's modern order is based. The fundamental principles still apply today. They knew land and personal easements. The Romans had developed complex legal institutes in relation to easement. Legal protection was regulated. The greatest differences are evident in the methods of establishing and terminating. Mostly it was a manipulation method and an iure cessio. These two legal institutes are not known in today's law. Likewise, modern law does not know some of the easements, for example, the easiest work of foreign slaves and livestock.
Keywords:
Easement
,
comparison
,
development
,
ZTLR
,
ODZ
,
roman times
Comments
Leave comment
You must
log in
to leave a comment.
Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
There are no comments!
Back
