| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Kolizijska pravila v konkurenčnopravnih sporih - problem neopredeljenosti pojmov v uredbi Rim II
Authors:ID Bezjak, Nina (Author)
ID Repas, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Bezjak_Nina_2018.pdf (2,01 MB)
MD5: DE67D66C85BBB060C3BEF53E88E36800
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/be059329-b9fb-439b-aa44-4a7b35e3945f
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Rim II ne definira pojmov nelojalne konkurence in ravnanj, ki omejujejo svobodno konkurenco, četudi se pravila glede določitve merodajnega prava v konkurenčnopravnih sporih nanašajo na ta dva pojma. Poleg omenjenih, določitev ustreznega prava v konkurenčnopravnih sporih otežujejo še nekateri drugi pomensko odprti pojmi, denimo (upoštevni) trg, škoda in kraj nastopa škodne posledice kot eni najpomembnejših. Ob tem se postavlja vprašanje, kako se sploh lotiti določitve ustreznega merodajnega prava, saj je odločitev v prvi fazi odvisna od tega, ali spor izvira iz pogodbene ali nepogodbene obveznosti. V nekaterih primerih tožba temelji tako na pogodbenih kot nepogodbenih elementih, zaradi česar je izbira prava še toliko bolj problematična. To magistrsko delo naslavlja problematiko kolizijskih pravil v konkurenčnopravnih sporih, pri čemer se osredotoča na definicijo trga in ostale pomensko odprte formulacije, saj je njihova opredelitev ključna za presojo, katere določbe v konkretnem primeru uporabiti. Tudi od tega je namreč odvisna pravna varnost udeležencev na trgu. Ugotoviti je, da Sodišče Evropske unije skuša z avtonomno razlago kazuistično razložiti vsebino pojmov in tako oblikovati poenotena pravila, ki jih lahko nacionalna sodišča uporabijo pri reševanju primerov. Razlaga SEU ni ostala povsem brez praznin, zato so naposled nacionalna sodišča vendarle tista, ki to razlago dopolnijo s svojo lastno, kar posledično nedvomno pomeni različne rezultate postopkov v različnih državah.
Keywords:nelojalna konkurenca, omejevanje konkurence, nepogodbene obveznosti, učinek na trgu, izbira merodajnega prava, upoštevni trg, avtonomija volje, člen 6 Rim II
Place of publishing:[S. l.
Publisher:N. Bezjak]
Year of publishing:2018
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-69443 New window
UDC:347.77.014(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5551659 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:YQ5ZU4BY
Publication date in DKUM:05.03.2018
Views:1380
Downloads:203
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
BEZJAK, Nina, 2018, Kolizijska pravila v konkurenčnopravnih sporih - problem neopredeljenosti pojmov v uredbi Rim II [online]. Master’s thesis. S. l. : N. Bezjak. [Accessed 14 March 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=69443
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:22.01.2018

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Conflict of laws in competition law disputes - problem of unspecified concepts in Rome II regulation
Abstract:Even though the provisions determining the applicable law in competition law disputes address unfair competition and restriction of free competition, Rome II does not define these two terms. In addition, some other semantically open concepts, such as the (relevant) market, the damage and the place of the occurrence of the damage, are making the choice of law in competition law disputes even more complicated. This raises the question of how to choose the relevant applicable law since the choice depends on whether a dispute arises from a contractual or non-contractual obligation in the first place. In some instances, a case is based on both contractual and non-contractual elements, which makes the choice of law even more problematic. This thesis addresses the conflict of laws in competition law disputes, focusing on market definition and some other semantically open formulations, since their definition is crucial when choosing the applicable law in a particular case. The basic requirement of legal certainty is a precise delineation and clear formulation of norms. It is found that the European Court of Justice attempts to autonomously interpret the aforementioned concepts in order to formulate uniform rules that can be applied by national courts when ruling on cases. However, the interpretation of the CJEU has not completely filled in the lacuna, and to that end, national courts are to complement that interpretation, which undoubtedly leads to different results of proceedings in different countries.
Keywords:unfair competition, restriction of competition, non-contractual obligations, market effect, choice of applicable law, relevant market, party autonomy, Article 6 Rome II


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica