Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
|
|
SLO
|
ENG
|
Cookies and privacy
DKUM
EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
FE - Faculty of Energy Technology
FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
FF - Faculty of Arts
FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
FL - Faculty of Logistic
FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
FT - Faculty of Tourism
FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
MF - Faculty of Medicine
PEF - Faculty of Education
PF - Faculty of Law
UKM - University of Maribor Library
UM - University of Maribor
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
COBISS
Faculty of Business and Economic, Maribor
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Maribor
Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Krško
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj
Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, Ljubljana
Faculty of Health Sciences
Library of Technical Faculties, Maribor
Faculty of Medicine, Maribor
Miklošič Library FPNM, Maribor
Faculty of Law, Maribor
University of Maribor Library
Bigger font
|
Smaller font
Introduction
Search
Browsing
Upload document
For students
For employees
Statistics
Login
First page
>
Show document
Show document
Title:
Vpliv načina pridelave na pridelek in kakovost paradižnika
Authors:
ID
Sušek, Tine
(Author)
ID
Bavec, Martina
(Mentor)
More about this mentor...
ID
Robačer, Martina
(Comentor)
Files:
VS_Susek_Tine_2016.pdf
(933,60 KB)
MD5: D7B1E13AD209E0E267B91D14762ABEB4
Language:
Slovenian
Work type:
Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:
FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Abstract:
Na pridelek in kakovost paradižnika, v svetovnem merilu najpomembnejše zelenjadnice, imajo lahko pridelovalni sistemi (PS) odločilen vpliv. Poljski poskus je bil izveden leta 2015 na trajnostnem poskusnem polju Fakultete za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede v Pivoli, kjer je bil proučevan vpliv PS (ekološki, biodinamični, integrirani in konvencionalni) na pridelek in kakovost (vsebnost sladkorja, C-vitamina, nitratov in nitritov) dveh kultivarjev ('Jani' in 'Amaneta F1') paradižnika. Vsako obravnavanje je bilo oskrbovano skladno z zahtevami za določen PS in dobro kmetijsko prakso. Najvišja skupna masa pridelka je v konvencionalnem (56,71 t ha-1) in biodinamičnem (53,98 t ha-1) PS, v tržnem pridelku se pridelki med konvencionalnim (37,58 t ha-1), biodinamičnim (36,77 t ha-1), integriranim (31,43 t ha-1) in ekološkim (27,13 t ha-1) PS ne razlikujejo. Najvišja vsebnost sladkorja je v biodinamičnem (4,92 oBx) in ekološkem (4,88 oBx) PS. Najnižja vsebnost nitratov je v ekološkem (42,67 mg kg-1) ter v integriranem (44,33 mg kg-1) PS. Med kultivarjema je razlika v skupni in tržni masi pridelka, v vsebnosti sladkorja ter C-vitamina v prid kultivarja 'Amaneta F1', ki hkrati kopiči manj nitratov od kultivarja 'Jani'. Potrjeni vplivi PS na proučevane parametre so lahko dobra osnova za odločitev, kateri PS bo izbran za pridelavo paradižnika, pri čemer imajo glede kakovosti prednost manj intenzivni PS.
Keywords:
paradižnik
,
način pridelave
,
pridelek
,
kakovost
Place of publishing:
Maribor
Year of publishing:
2016
PID:
20.500.12556/DKUM-63949
NUK URN:
URN:SI:UM:DK:19KVAYRS
Publication date in DKUM:
11.10.2016
Views:
1877
Downloads:
424
Metadata:
Categories:
FKBV
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
SUŠEK, Tine, 2016,
Vpliv načina pridelave na pridelek in kakovost paradižnika
[online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Maribor. [Accessed 8 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=63949
Copy citation
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:
Voting is allowed only for
logged in
users.
Share:
Similar works from our repository:
Production of apples pursuant to the production system "0,0 residue"
THE ANALYSIS OF USABILITY 0, 0 RESIDUE APPROACH TO PRODUCTION OF APPLES TYPE JONAGOLD
PESTICIDE RESIDUE IN VEGETABLES AND FRUITS
Economic feasibility of fruit production under the 0.0 MLR system
ǂThe ǂanalysis of usability 0,0 residue approach to production of apples type jonagold
Similar works from other repositories:
Copper in horticulture
Hops (Humulus kupulus L.) protection in organic production
Root exudates as potentially preventive agent against harmfull organisms in organic production
Glucosinolates in plant protection strategies: a review
Sadjarstvo - pridelava jabolk
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Impact of production systems on yield and quality of tomato
Abstract:
The production systems (PS) can have a significant impact on the yield and quality of tomato, the world’s most important vegetable. In 2015, a field experiment was conducted on a sustainable experimental field, owned by the Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences in Pivola, which studied the impact of PS (organic, biodynamic, integrated and conventional) on the yield and quality (the contents of sugar, vitamin C, nitrates and nitrites) of two tomato cultivars ('Jani' and 'Amaneta F1'). Each treatment was provisioned in accordance with the requirements of a particular PS and good agricultural practice. In the conventional (56.71 t ha-1) and biodynamic (53.98 t ha-1) PS the total weight of the yield is the highest, while as far as the market yield is concerned, there are no differences between the conventional (37.58 t ha-1), biodynamic (36.77 t ha-1), integrated (31.43 t ha-1) and organic (27.13 t ha-1) PS. The highest sugar content is in the biodynamic (4.92 oBx) and organic (4.88 oBx) PS. The lowest nitrate content is in the organic (42.67 mg kg-1) and integrated (44.33 mg kg-1) PS. The two cultivars differ in the total and market weight of the yield, as well as in the contents of sugar and vitamin C, in favour of the cultivar 'Amaneta F1', which also accumulates less nitrates than the cultivar 'Jani'. The confirmed impacts of the production systems on the studied parameters can represent a solid basis for deciding which PS will be selected for the production of tomato. In terms of quality, the less intensive PS have a priority.
Keywords:
tomato
,
production system
,
yield
,
quality
Comments
Leave comment
You must
log in
to leave a comment.
Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
There are no comments!
Back
