| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Vpliv načina pridelave na pridelek in kakovost paradižnika
Authors:ID Sušek, Tine (Author)
ID Bavec, Martina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Robačer, Martina (Comentor)
Files:.pdf VS_Susek_Tine_2016.pdf (933,60 KB)
MD5: D7B1E13AD209E0E267B91D14762ABEB4
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Abstract:Na pridelek in kakovost paradižnika, v svetovnem merilu najpomembnejše zelenjadnice, imajo lahko pridelovalni sistemi (PS) odločilen vpliv. Poljski poskus je bil izveden leta 2015 na trajnostnem poskusnem polju Fakultete za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede v Pivoli, kjer je bil proučevan vpliv PS (ekološki, biodinamični, integrirani in konvencionalni) na pridelek in kakovost (vsebnost sladkorja, C-vitamina, nitratov in nitritov) dveh kultivarjev ('Jani' in 'Amaneta F1') paradižnika. Vsako obravnavanje je bilo oskrbovano skladno z zahtevami za določen PS in dobro kmetijsko prakso. Najvišja skupna masa pridelka je v konvencionalnem (56,71 t ha-1) in biodinamičnem (53,98 t ha-1) PS, v tržnem pridelku se pridelki med konvencionalnim (37,58 t ha-1), biodinamičnim (36,77 t ha-1), integriranim (31,43 t ha-1) in ekološkim (27,13 t ha-1) PS ne razlikujejo. Najvišja vsebnost sladkorja je v biodinamičnem (4,92 oBx) in ekološkem (4,88 oBx) PS. Najnižja vsebnost nitratov je v ekološkem (42,67 mg kg-1) ter v integriranem (44,33 mg kg-1) PS. Med kultivarjema je razlika v skupni in tržni masi pridelka, v vsebnosti sladkorja ter C-vitamina v prid kultivarja 'Amaneta F1', ki hkrati kopiči manj nitratov od kultivarja 'Jani'. Potrjeni vplivi PS na proučevane parametre so lahko dobra osnova za odločitev, kateri PS bo izbran za pridelavo paradižnika, pri čemer imajo glede kakovosti prednost manj intenzivni PS.
Keywords:paradižnik, način pridelave, pridelek, kakovost
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-63949 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:19KVAYRS
Publication date in DKUM:11.10.2016
Views:1877
Downloads:424
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FKBV
:
SUŠEK, Tine, 2016, Vpliv načina pridelave na pridelek in kakovost paradižnika [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Maribor. [Accessed 8 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=63949
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Searching for similar works...Please wait....
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Impact of production systems on yield and quality of tomato
Abstract:The production systems (PS) can have a significant impact on the yield and quality of tomato, the world’s most important vegetable. In 2015, a field experiment was conducted on a sustainable experimental field, owned by the Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences in Pivola, which studied the impact of PS (organic, biodynamic, integrated and conventional) on the yield and quality (the contents of sugar, vitamin C, nitrates and nitrites) of two tomato cultivars ('Jani' and 'Amaneta F1'). Each treatment was provisioned in accordance with the requirements of a particular PS and good agricultural practice. In the conventional (56.71 t ha-1) and biodynamic (53.98 t ha-1) PS the total weight of the yield is the highest, while as far as the market yield is concerned, there are no differences between the conventional (37.58 t ha-1), biodynamic (36.77 t ha-1), integrated (31.43 t ha-1) and organic (27.13 t ha-1) PS. The highest sugar content is in the biodynamic (4.92 oBx) and organic (4.88 oBx) PS. The lowest nitrate content is in the organic (42.67 mg kg-1) and integrated (44.33 mg kg-1) PS. The two cultivars differ in the total and market weight of the yield, as well as in the contents of sugar and vitamin C, in favour of the cultivar 'Amaneta F1', which also accumulates less nitrates than the cultivar 'Jani'. The confirmed impacts of the production systems on the studied parameters can represent a solid basis for deciding which PS will be selected for the production of tomato. In terms of quality, the less intensive PS have a priority.
Keywords:tomato, production system, yield, quality


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica