| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:SENZORIČNA OCENA KRUHA IZ RŽI (Secale cereale L.), NAVADNE PŠENICE (Triticum aestivum L.) IN SORŽICE (MEŠANICA PŠENICE IN RŽI)
Authors:ID Hojnik, Urška (Author)
ID Grobelnik Mlakar, Silva (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Hojnik_Urska_2016.pdf (812,11 KB)
MD5: 80434FA8053339A30F7E7B736800D91F
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Abstract:V diplomskem delu smo vrednotili fizikalne in senzorične lastnosti kruhov iz ržene, pšenične in soržične moke. V poskusu so bile uporabljene štiri sorte pšenice ('Edison', Justus', 'Pegasus' in 'Soissons') ter sorta ozimne rži 'Walet'. Po peki smo pri vseh treh vrstah kruha izmerili volumen, specifični volumen in izgubo mase pri peki. Senzorično ocenjevanje smo izvedli s pomočjo pet-stopenjske hedonske lestvice in senzoričnega trikotnika. Rezultati so pokazali, da ima vrsta kruha in sorta pšenice, uporabljene v pšenični in soržični moki, statistično značilen vpliv na vse preučevane fizikalne lastnosti kruha. V povprečju imajo vzorci pšeničnega kruha večji volumen (1.722 cm3), specifični volumen (2,16 mL g-1) in večje izgube pri peki (18,8 %) v primerjavi z vzorci soržičnega kruha (1.530 cm3, 1,72 mL g-1 in 14,0 %). Analiza rezultatov v okviru sorte pšenice opravljenega hedonskega senzoričnega ocenjevanja kaže, da vrsta kruha vpliva na oceno barve skorje ('Edison'), oceno poroznosti sredice ('Pegasus'), mehkost kruha (vse sorte), okus ('Justus', 'Soisson') ter na oceno skupnega vtisa ('Soisson'). Rezultati senzoričnega trikotnika kažejo, da so vzorci kruha iz ržene in soržične moke dovolj različni in jih preizkuševalci razlikujejo, senzorične lastnosti kruha iz pšenične in soržične moke pa so podobne in jih v primeru sort 'Edison' in 'Pegasus' ni moč razlikovati.
Keywords:kruh, soržica, fizikalne lastnosti kruha, senzorične lastnosti kruha
Place of publishing:Maribor
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-61063 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:NR9KNJHX
Publication date in DKUM:22.07.2016
Views:2962
Downloads:246
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FKBV
:
HOJNIK, Urška, 2016, SENZORIČNA OCENA KRUHA IZ RŽI (Secale cereale L.), NAVADNE PŠENICE (Triticum aestivum  L.) IN SORŽICE (MEŠANICA PŠENICE IN RŽI) [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Maribor. [Accessed 23 March 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=61063
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share



Similar works from other repositories:

No similar works found

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:SENSORY VALUE OF BREAD MADE FROM RYE (Secale cereale L.), COMMON WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) AND MESLIN (MIXTURE OF RYE AND WHEAT)
Abstract:In this diploma thesis, we studied the physical and sensory properties of bread made from rye, wheat and meslin flour. We used four varieties of wheat in the experiment ('Edison', Justus', 'Pegasus' and 'Soissons') and a varietie of winter rye called 'Walet'. After the baking process we measured the volume, specific volume and baking loss in all three types of bread. Five rank hedonic scale was used for the sensory evaluation, but the sensory triangle was used for the analytical experiments. The results showed that the type of bread and varietie of wheat used for the wheat and meslin flour had a significant influence on the volume of the bread. When compared meslin and wheat bread, and the wheat bread had, on average, a bigger volume (1.722 cm3), a bigger specific volume (2,16 mL g-1) and a bigger baking loss while baking (18,8 %). Meanwhile, the meslin bread results came up as follows: 1.530 cm3, 1,72 mL g-1 and 14,0 %. The results of the hedonic scale evaluation reveald that the varietie of bread has a significant influence on the colour of the crust ('Edison'), the inside of the bread ('Pegasus'), the softness of the bread (all types), the flavour ('Justus', 'Soisson') and the final impression. The results of the sensory triangle show that the samples of rye and meslin bread were different enough to be differentiated. The sensory qualities of the bread made from wheat and meslin flour were similar and could not be distinguished; when dealing with the 'Edison' and 'Pegasus' types.
Keywords:bread, meslin, physical properties of bread, sensory properties of bread


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica