| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:OPTIMIZACIJA DDV V FINANČNEM SEKTORJU
Authors:ID Lukač, Sašo (Author)
ID Škof, Bojan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf RAZ_Lukac_Saso_i2016.pdf (1,77 MB)
MD5: BF6F28F3987DEAC2EDFAE502744AD798
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Ker so davki prisilne dajatve, davčni zavezanci stremijo k temu, da svoje ekonomske interese v čim večji meri zaščitijo. Pri tem se poslužujejo različnih tehnik, od legalnih in legitimnih, kot so koriščenje davčnih olajšav in izbira najugodnejše pravno-formalne oblike organiziranja, pa vse do nelegalnih in seveda nelegitimnih, ki predstavljajo davčne utaje. Nekje vmes, brez jasne meje med legalnim in (pogojno) legitimnim ter nelegalnim, obstajajo metode davčnega izogibanja. V magistrskem delu so predstavljene različne oblike davčnega načrtovanja, ki se ga lahko poslužijo finančne institucije v okviru svojega poslovanja, z namenom optimizacije DDV, saj neodbitni davek predstavlja stroškovno komponento poslovanja finančnih institucij. Na podlagi primerjalno-pravne analize so v delu predstavljena štiri področja, ki se jih slovenski zavezanci v finančnem sektorju pri načrtovanju svojih obveznosti na področju DDV, bodisi zaradi neznanja ali pomanjkanja pravno-poslovne prakse, ne poslužujejo. Rezultat davčnega planiranja zavezancev ne sme privesti v sfero davčnega utajevanja, kar pa je posredno povezano tudi z doktrino zlorabe prava EU kot pravno normo, razvito s sodno prakso Sodišča EU, saj lahko pomeni izgubo zavezančevih pravic, temelječih na relevantnem pravnem aktu EU. Pri tem je potrebno imeti v mislih izjavo angleškega sodnika Tomlina, da »vsak zavezanec, ki zna, je upravičen urediti svoje zadeve tako, da je njegova davčna obveznost, v skladu z zakonom, nižja kot bi bila sicer. V kolikor mu uspe zadeve strukturirati na način, da si zagotovi nižjo davčno obveznost, kljub morebitnemu nestrinjanju davčne uprave ali drugih davčnih zavezancev z njegovo iznajdljivostjo, ga ni mogoče prisiliti k plačilu višje davčne obveznosti«.
Keywords:test
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[S. Lukač]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-59483 New window
UDC:336.22(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5289259 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:CP8UCNB2
Publication date in DKUM:16.02.2017
Views:1783
Downloads:102
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
LUKAČ, Sašo, 2016, OPTIMIZACIJA DDV V FINANČNEM SEKTORJU [online]. Master’s thesis. Maribor : S. Lukač. [Accessed 15 March 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=59483
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:VAT optimization in financial sector
Abstract:Taxes are compulsory duties and consequently taxpayers strive to protect their economic interests at the highest degree possible. By doing so taxpayers reach out for various techniques from legal and legitimate, such as utilization of tax incentives and selection of the most appropriate legal form of conducting business, up to illegal and illegitimate, which constitutes tax evasion. Somewhere in between, without a clear line between the legal and (conditionally) legitimate, there are methods of tax avoidance. There are various tax planning techniques presented in this master thesis, which taxpayers acting in the finance sector can benefit from in the form of VAT optimization, as the input VAT remains in large part as non-deductible at the level of financial institutions. However, due to the lack of knowledge or legal and business practice those techniques are not (widely) applied for by the Slovene financial institutions in the field of VAT. The result of tax planning should not lead taxpayers in the position of tax evasion which is indirectly related to the doctrine of abuse of EU law as a legal norm, developed by the court practice of the CJEU and can cause the loss of taxpayers rights from the relevant EU legal act. Having said that following words of the judge Tomlin must also be kept in mid: »Every man is entitled if he can to arrange his affairs so that the tax attaching under the appropriate Acts is less than it otherwise would be. If he succeeds in ordering them so as to secure that result, then, however unappreciative the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or his fellow taxpayers may be of his ingenuity, he cannot be compelled to pay an increased tax«.
Keywords:test


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica