| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:VROČANJE IN PRAVICA DO SODNEGA VARSTVA V SODNIH POSTOPKIH
Authors:ID Kežmah, Urška (Author)
ID Galič, Aleš (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf DOK_Kezmah_Urska_2016.pdf (5,26 MB)
MD5: 9FD5973AAB6FFD4A0583133B33F5B6E4
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Doctoral dissertation
Typology:2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Disertacija obravnava institut vročitve v povezavi s pravico do sodnega varstva v civilnih sodnih postopkih (dostopa do sodišča). Podrobneje so obravnavani različni sistemi vročanja. Primerjalno pravno so analizirani različni načini vročitve pri čemer je bila posebna pozornost namenjena identifikaciji napak pri vročanju, njihova razvrstitev in možnost konvalidacije. Za potrebe analize učinkovitosti in pravnih posledic vročitve smo identificirali objekt oz. predmet vročitve. Ugotavljali smo katera pisanja se vročajo in na kakšen način. Za učinkovitost vročitve je bilo treba namreč nujno opredeliti kdo je tisti, ki dejansko vroča. Izhajali smo iz predpostavke, da je vsaka vročitev povezana s stroški na eni strani in časovno komponento (zlasti čas trajanja postopka) na drugi strani. Učinkovitost sodnega postopka pa se ne meri zgolj v njegovi hitrosti temveč tudi v učinkoviti zaščiti pravic, ki jih zasledujejo stranke med postopkom. Civilni sodni postopek, ki je bil predmet preučevanja, namreč temelji na dveh strankah s praviloma nasprotujočimi si interesi. Zato učinkovit sistem vročanja bistveno pripore k varstvu pravic obeh strank. Učinkovit sistem vročitve pa je tisti, ki omogoča pravilno vročitev pošiljke naslovniku. V zvezi s tem vprašanjem smo obravnavali fikcijo vročitve, ki vzpostavlja domnevo o vročitvi, čeprav pošiljka dejansko ni bila vročena. Ta je posebej problematična, ko gre za čezmejno vročanje, saj fikcija vročitve ne ustreza minimalnim postopkovnim standardom, ki jih za vročanje določajo uredbe EU. Ugotovili smo, da je vročanje predmet konvencijskega varstva temeljnih pravic po EKČP ter ustavno sodnega varstva ter podrobneje izpostavili pravico do poštenega sojenja in pravico do pravnega sredstva ter z njimi povezane konvencijske pravice. V okviru čezmejnega vročanja smo preučevali različne sisteme čezmejnega vročanja, ki ga vzpostavljajo mednarodne konvencije, pogodbe in Uredbe EU. Izpostavili smo prednosti, ki jih omogoča elektronsko vročanje ter napravili analizo pričakovanih prihrankov, ki jih tako vročanje omogoča. Primerjali smo različne sisteme za elektronsko vročanje, pri čemer smo ločili med zaprtimi in odprtimi sistemi za vročanje.
Keywords:vročanje, civilno procesno pravo, pravica do sodnega varstva
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[U. Kežmah]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-59368 New window
UDC:347.923(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:5158187 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:H3MVDFQU
Publication date in DKUM:05.09.2016
Views:3216
Downloads:902
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
KEŽMAH, Urška, 2016, VROČANJE IN PRAVICA DO SODNEGA VARSTVA V SODNIH POSTOPKIH [online]. Doctoral dissertation. Maribor : U. Kežmah. [Accessed 23 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=59368
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:SERVICE AND THE RIGHT TO JUSTICE IN JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Abstract:Dissertation deals with the institute of service of documents in relation to the right to judicial protection in civil proceedings (access to justice). Different systems of service are discussed. Methods of service are compared with special attention to identification of errors, classification of errors and the possibility of their rectification. For the analysis of effectiveness and legal consequences of the service, we have identified subjects of service. We determined which documents have to be served and how. It is important to define who has to perform the service of documents. We have started from the assumption that every service of documents is related to the costs on the one hand and the time component (in particular the duration of the procedure) on the other. The efficiency of judicial proceedings is not measured only by its speed but also by the effective protection of the rights pursued by the parties during the procedure. Civil proceedings, which have been the subject of research, are based on a two-party rule, with conflicting interests. Therefore, an effective system of service significantly improves protection of the rights of both parties. An effective service system is the one that enables them to properly and effectively service the documents to the addressee. In accordance with this issue we have discussed fiction of the service that establishes a presumption of the service, even if the document has not been actually served. This is especially problematic when it comes to cross-border service as a fiction of the service does not meet the minimum procedural standards for the service set by the EU regulations. We have proved that the service is the subject of protection of fundamental rights under the ECHR convention and the constitutional rights. We have further analyzed the right to a fair trial and the right to appeal and other related rights guaranteed by the Convention. In the context of cross-border service, we have studied various systems of cross-border service, established by international conventions, treaties and EU regulations. We have researched the advantages offered by the electronic service and have made an analysis of projected savings when using this method of the service. We have compared various systems for the electronic service, in particular the difference between closed and open systems of the service.
Keywords:service of documents, civil procedure, right to judicial protection


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica