Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
|
|
SLO
|
ENG
|
Cookies and privacy
DKUM
EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
FE - Faculty of Energy Technology
FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
FF - Faculty of Arts
FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
FL - Faculty of Logistic
FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
FT - Faculty of Tourism
FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
MF - Faculty of Medicine
PEF - Faculty of Education
PF - Faculty of Law
UKM - University of Maribor Library
UM - University of Maribor
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
COBISS
Faculty of Business and Economic, Maribor
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Maribor
Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Krško
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj
Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, Ljubljana
Faculty of Health Sciences
Library of Technical Faculties, Maribor
Faculty of Medicine, Maribor
Miklošič Library FPNM, Maribor
Faculty of Law, Maribor
University of Maribor Library
Bigger font
|
Smaller font
Introduction
Search
Browsing
Upload document
For students
For employees
Statistics
Login
First page
>
Show document
Show document
Title:
Načini ugotavljanja znanja pri pouku matematike
Authors:
ID
Koprivšek, Nejc
(Author)
ID
Lipovec, Alenka
(Mentor)
More about this mentor...
ID
Repolusk, Samo
(Comentor)
Files:
MAG_Koprivsek_Nejc_2014.pdf
(904,62 KB)
MD5: 6558814C79E97A389416731459990257
Language:
Slovenian
Work type:
Master's thesis/paper
Typology:
2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:
FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
Abstract:
Preverjanje in ocenjevanje znanja pri pouku matematike je pomemben del vzgojno-izobraževalnega procesa, skozi katerega gredo učenci. Učitelji preverjajo znanje matematike s pomočjo pisnih in ustnih preizkusov, uporabljajo pa tudi domače naloge, raziskovalne naloge, osebne mape in alternativne načine ugotavljanja znanja, ki zajemajo kvize, skupinsko reševanje nalog, sestavljanje nalog drug drugemu in uporabo računalniških aplikacij. Učitelji morajo biti pri podajanju in preverjanju znanja pozorni na učne cilje in standarde znanja, določene z učnim načrtom, ter na pokritost različnih tipov matematičnih znanj po izbrani taksonomiji znanj. S preverjanji morajo zagotoviti vsem učencem, tudi učencem s posebnimi potrebami, enake pogoje za izkazovanje znanja. Učencem dodelijo številčne ali opisne ocene. Predtesti so pisna preverjanja znanja, ki jih učenci pišejo pred pisnim ocenjevanjem. Empirični del tega magistrskega dela temelji na raziskavi, ki je bila izvedena na manjšem vzorcu, kjer smo raziskovali, ali in kako učitelji v slovenskih osnovnih šolah uporabljajo predteste. V rezultatih raziskave predstavimo aktualno prakso učiteljev pri izvajanju predtestov, kakšni naj bi bili predtesti po mnenju učiteljev in kakšen odnos imajo do njih. Pomembna je ugotovitev, da učitelji vedo, da predtesti niso obvezna oblika preverjanja znanja, vendar jih kljub temu pogosto uporabljajo. Predstavimo tudi prednosti in pomanjkljivosti predtestov ter nekatere predloge za učinkovito preverjanje znanja.
Keywords:
ugotavljanje znanja
,
preverjanje in ocenjevanje
,
pouk matematike
,
pisni preizkusi
,
predtesti
Place of publishing:
Maribor
Publisher:
[N. Koprivšek]
Year of publishing:
2014
PID:
20.500.12556/DKUM-44362
UDC:
37.091.279.7:51(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:
20619016
NUK URN:
URN:SI:UM:DK:56HI0KC6
Publication date in DKUM:
20.06.2014
Views:
2420
Downloads:
484
Metadata:
Categories:
FNM
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
KOPRIVŠEK, Nejc, 2014,
Načini ugotavljanja znanja pri pouku matematike
[online]. Master’s thesis. Maribor : N. Koprivšek. [Accessed 4 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=44362
Copy citation
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:
Voting is allowed only for
logged in
users.
Share:
Similar works from our repository:
RILEM TC 247-DTA round robin test
RILEM TC 247-DTA round robin test
Final report on the RIS Intership implementation
Final report on the RIS Intership implementation
Particle size manipulation as an influential parameter in the development of mechanical properties in electric arc furnace slag-based AAM
Similar works from other repositories:
Evaluation of innovative façade panels with a finishing layer of alkaliactivated industrial and construction waste
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Assessment in the Mathematics Classroom
Abstract:
Checking and grading of mathematical knowledge at mathematical courses is a very important part of the educational process through which the pupils go. Teachers check knowledge through written and oral examination, homework, investigations, personal data and alternative ways of assessment, which consist of quizzes, group problem solving, constructing tasks for each other and usage of computer applications. When teachers are preparing assessments, they have to bear in mind the teaching goals and standards of knowledge, which are defined with curriculum. Also different kinds of knowledge have to be covered by the selected taxonomy of knowledge. All the pupils, even those with special needs, have to have the same conditions to show their knowledge. Pupils get numerical or descriptive notes. Pretests are written exams, which pupils write before the real written assessment. The empirical part of this master thesis is based on research, which was made on a small sample, where we asked how and if the teachers in Slovenia’s primary school use pre-tests. The results show, how the pre-tests should look like and what kind of relationship do the teachers have towards them. A very important conclusion is that teachers know, that pre-tests are not obligatory work for them but they still often use them. We state positive and negative aspects of pretests and some proposals for effective assessments.
Keywords:
assessment
,
checking and grading
,
mathematics instruction
,
written tests
,
pre-tests
Comments
Leave comment
You must
log in
to leave a comment.
Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
There are no comments!
Back
