| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:IZBIRA MATERIALA ZA KONTROLO KAKOVOSTI POTENCIALA ZETA TRDNIH POVRŠIN
Authors:ID Rudaš, Manuela (Author)
ID Brodnjak-Vončina, Darinka (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Petrinić, Irena (Comentor)
Files:.pdf UNI_Rudas_Manuela_2010.pdf (2,23 MB)
MD5: A8BD0F5CF38CF0271AA20D1C53CE544B
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/bb4bb8db-7063-411f-b057-031659bc5588
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Abstract:IZBIRA MATERIALA ZA KONTROLO KAKOVOSTI POTENCIALA ZETA TRDNIH POVRŠIN Povzetek Zanesljive rezultate meritev lahko zagotovimo le z brezhibnim delovanjem merilnih naprav, katerih zmogljivost pa se s časom in uporabo slabša. Pravilno delovanje merilne naprave lahko preverimo z referenčnim materialom. Tudi elektrokinetični analizator SurPASS, ki je na tržišču relativno kratek čas, je podvržen različnim vplivom in potrebuje material za kontrolo kakovosti potenciala zeta. Instrument SurPASS namreč omogoča merjenje pretočnega toka, s katerim določimo t.i. potencial zeta, ki določa stanje površinskega naboja na mejni površini trdnega telesa in tekočine. Izbire trdnega materiala z ravno površino, ki je primeren za merjenje v merilni celici CLC, smo se lotili z meritvami časovne odvisnosti potenciala zeta na polimerih (PTFE, PES in PET) ter steklu. Najbolj stabilne meritve dajeta vzorca PES in PET, ki sta glede na dobljene rezultate konstante hitrosti nabrekanja tudi najbolj hidrofobna. Zato smo meritve nadaljevali na teh dveh materialih. Statistična analiza rezultatov teh meritev nakazuje na homogenost obeh materialov, čeprav v nekaterih primerih daje prednost materialu PES, spet drugič PET. Takšne nasprotujoče si rezultate meritev lahko pripišemo tudi napakam v meritvah (omočenost nemerjene površine vzorca v CLC) in ne nujno nehomogenosti materiala.
Keywords:Ključne besede: referenčni material, polimerni materiali, elektrokinetične lastnosti, pretočni tok, potencial zeta
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Rudaš]
Year of publishing:2010
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-16781 New window
UDC:678.7:544.638(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:15001878 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:EDFMWMYJ
Publication date in DKUM:02.12.2010
Views:2908
Downloads:180
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FKKT
:
RUDAŠ, Manuela, 2010, IZBIRA MATERIALA ZA KONTROLO KAKOVOSTI POTENCIALA ZETA TRDNIH POVRŠIN [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Maribor : M. Rudaš. [Accessed 26 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=16781
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:MATERIALS SELECTION FOR THE ZETA POTENTIAL QUALITY-CONTROL OF SOLID SURFACES
Abstract:MATERIALS SELECTION FOR THE ZETA POTENTIAL QUALITY-CONTROL OF SOLID SURFACES Abstract Reliable results of measurements can only be assured by using faultless measuring instruments, the efficiencies of which do, regrettably, deteriorate over time and usage. The correct functioning of instruments can be examined using reference materials. The SurPASS electrokinetic analyser, which has only been on the market for a relatively short time, is also subject to different influences and therefore needs a material for zeta potential quality control. The SurPASS instrument enables the measurement of streaming-current which helps us to determine the so-called zeta potential, which then indicates the status of the surface-charge on the border area of a solid or liquid. We began by selecting a solid material with a flat surface, which would be suitable for the CLC measuring cell, using the measurements of time-dependence regarding zeta potential on polymers (PTFE, PES and PET), and glass. The more stable measurements were given for samples PES and PET, for which it provided the more constant results, and also the most hydrophobic materials. Consequently, we continued our measurements on the afore-mentioned two materials. Statistical analysis of these results indicated the homogeneities of both materials although, in some cases, it gave an advantage to PES, and then the second time to PET. These kinds of contradictive measurement results can also be annotated to mistakes during the measuring process (wettability of the non-measured surface sample in CLC), and not necessarily to any non-homogeneity of the material.
Keywords:reference material, polymeric materials, electrokinetic properties, streaming current, zeta potential


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica