Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
|
|
SLO
|
ENG
|
Cookies and privacy
DKUM
EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
FE - Faculty of Energy Technology
FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
FF - Faculty of Arts
FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
FL - Faculty of Logistic
FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
FT - Faculty of Tourism
FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
MF - Faculty of Medicine
PEF - Faculty of Education
PF - Faculty of Law
UKM - University of Maribor Library
UM - University of Maribor
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
COBISS
Faculty of Business and Economic, Maribor
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Maribor
Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Krško
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj
Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, Ljubljana
Faculty of Health Sciences
Library of Technical Faculties, Maribor
Faculty of Medicine, Maribor
Miklošič Library FPNM, Maribor
Faculty of Law, Maribor
University of Maribor Library
Bigger font
|
Smaller font
Introduction
Search
Browsing
Upload document
For students
For employees
Statistics
Login
First page
>
Show document
Show document
Title:
Privolitev oškodovanca v škodo : magistrsko delo
Authors:
ID
Kuster, Rok
(Author)
ID
Samec Berghaus, Nataša
(Mentor)
More about this mentor...
Files:
MAG_Kuster_Rok_2024.pdf
(1,80 MB)
MD5: 5592140FD7EE9076D368FA113B339458
Language:
Slovenian
Work type:
Master's thesis/paper
Typology:
2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:
PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:
Načelo volenti non fit injuria poznamo že iz časa rimskega prava, v slovenskem pravnem redu pa je kodificirano v 140. členu OZ oziroma v institutu privolitve oškodovanca v škodo. Oškodovančeva privolitev izključuje protipravnost ravnanja in povzročene škode, posledično pa tudi odškodninsko odgovornost povzročitelja škode. Kljub temu da gre za institut, ki ima razmeroma dolgo pravno zgodovino, v slovenskem pravnem prostoru še ni zadostno raziskan. Magistrsko delo se osredotoča na prikaz geneze izvora načela volenti non fit injuria oziroma instituta privolitve oškodovanca v škodo in na njegovo umestitev v slovenski pravni sistem. Avtor analizira pravno naravo instituta privolitev oškodovanca v škodo in na tej podlagi prikaže, na kakšen način privolitev oškodovanca izključi protipravnost ravnanja in povzročene škode. Nadalje avtor analizira predpostavke, ki morajo biti izpolnjene, da privolitvi oškodovanca pripišemo pravno veljavnost in predstavi relevantna stališča obstoječe slovenske pravne teorije. Predstavljeni so tudi razlikovalni kriteriji, ki institut privolitve oškodovanca v škodo ločujejo od instituta ravnanja na lastno odgovornost, končno pa avtor poskuša začrtati tudi vsebinske meje pravno priznane privolitve oškodovanca v škodo.
Keywords:
civilno pravo
,
nepogodbena odškodninska odgovornost
,
privolitev oškodovanca v škodo
,
izključitev odškodninske odgovornosti
Place of publishing:
Maribor
Place of performance:
Maribor
Publisher:
R. Kuster
Year of publishing:
2024
Number of pages:
1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (85 str.))
PID:
20.500.12556/DKUM-90778
UDC:
347.426(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:
215724291
Publication date in DKUM:
20.11.2024
Views:
0
Downloads:
55
Metadata:
Categories:
PF
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
KUSTER, Rok, 2024,
Privolitev oškodovanca v škodo : magistrsko delo
[online]. Master’s thesis. Maribor : R. Kuster. [Accessed 17 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=90778
Copy citation
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:
Voting is allowed only for
logged in
users.
Share:
Similar works from our repository:
Theory of discourse and semiotics
Peirceova teorija raziskave kot poetološki model
How to study literary realism as archive art?
"Ik ben toch niet gek!"
Similar works from other repositories:
Radijska igra in njene dramaturške specifike
Charles Sanders Peirce: Izbrani spisi o teoriji znaka in pomenu ter pragmaticizmu. Ljubljana: Krtina, 2004, 184 str.
Ekonomska relevantnost pozornost vzbujajoče potrošnje
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:
The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:
23.09.2024
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
Consent of the injured party to harm
Abstract:
The principle of volenti non fit injuria has been known since the time of Roman law, and in the Slovenian legal system, it is codified in Article 140 of the Obligations Code, which deals with the institute of the injured party's consent to harm. The injured party's consent excludes the illegality of the act and the resulting damage, and consequently, the liability for damages of the perpetrator. Although this principle has a relatively long legal history, it has not been sufficiently researched in the Slovenian legal space. This master's thesis focuses on presenting the genesis of the principle of volenti non fit injuria or the institute of the injured party's consent to harm and its placement with-in the Slovenian legal system. The author analyses the legal nature of the institute of the injured party's consent to harm and on this basis, demonstrates how the injured party's consent excludes the illegality of the act and the resulting damage. Further-more, the author analyses the prerequisites that must be met for the injured party's consent to be legally valid and presents relevant viewpoints of existing Slovenian le-gal theory. The distinguishing criteria that separate the institute of the injured party's consent to harm from the institute of acting at one's own risk are also presented. Finally, the author attempts to delineate the substantive boundaries of legally recognized consent to harm.
Keywords:
civil law
,
tortious responsibility
,
delictual liability
,
consent
,
justification grounds
Comments
Leave comment
You must
log in
to leave a comment.
Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
There are no comments!
Back
