Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
|
|
SLO
|
ENG
|
Cookies and privacy
DKUM
EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
FE - Faculty of Energy Technology
FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
FF - Faculty of Arts
FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture
FKBV - Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
FKKT - Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
FL - Faculty of Logistic
FNM - Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
FT - Faculty of Tourism
FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
MF - Faculty of Medicine
PEF - Faculty of Education
PF - Faculty of Law
UKM - University of Maribor Library
UM - University of Maribor
UZUM - University of Maribor Press
COBISS
Faculty of Business and Economic, Maribor
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Maribor
Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Krško
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj
Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, Ljubljana
Faculty of Health Sciences
Library of Technical Faculties, Maribor
Faculty of Medicine, Maribor
Miklošič Library FPNM, Maribor
Faculty of Law, Maribor
University of Maribor Library
Bigger font
|
Smaller font
Introduction
Search
Browsing
Upload document
For students
For employees
Statistics
Login
First page
>
Show document
Show document
Title:
Kritičen razmislek o Reidovi zasliševalski tehniki
Authors:
ID
Areh, Igor
(Author)
Files:
07_ACriticalReviewOfReidsInterrogationTechnique_2013_3.pdf
(345,17 KB)
MD5: 214B0508BF506232C3EFD8D1C47E38C3
PID:
20.500.12556/dkum/60cea195-887c-451d-bee0-76d3447e20ce
https://www.fvv.um.si/rV/arhiv/2013-3/07_ACriticalReviewOfReidsInterrogationTechnique_2013_3.html
Language:
Slovenian
Work type:
Professional work
Typology:
1.04 - Professional Article
Organization:
FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:
Namen prispevka: Avtor želi opozoriti na vzpostavitev kritične distance do zasliševalskih tehnik, ki prihajajo predvsem iz ZDA. Ker je forenzična psihologija v Sloveniji slabo razvita, se tuje znanje s tega področja pogosto prenaša v naše okolje prenagljeno in brez poglobljenih strokovnih analiz, uporabniki tako prenesenega znanja pa so pogosto zavedeni. Ugotovitve: Zaradi razlik v zakonodaji Slovenije in ZDA se prisilne zasliševalske tehnike, kot je na primer Reidova, pri nas ne uporabljajo. Kljub temu pa lahko opazimo, da kar nekaj znanja kriminalistov izhaja iz zasliševalskih priročnikov, za katere velja, da so predvsem zbirke subjektivnih izkušenj avtorjev. Ti svoje priročnike agresivno tržijo in jih zavajajoče predstavljajo kot znanstveno utemeljene tehnike. Resnica je drugačna: priročniki temeljijo na nepreverjenih domnevah in na dvomljivih raziskovalnih ugotovitvah, obenem pa avtorji izkazujejo očitno nepoznavanje osnovnih psiholoških in metodoloških znanj. Praktična uporabnost: V prispevku so predstavljene glavne kritike tipičnega predstavnika prisilnih zasliševalskih tehnik – Reidove tehnike. Raziskave zadnjih desetletij kažejo, da je uporaba takšnih tehnik neupravičena, saj znanost njihovih ugotovitev ne potrjuje, ali pa jim celo nasprotuje. Pri preiskovalcih, ki so pod vplivom priročnikov, se pojavljata napihovanje samozavesti in neučinkovitost prepoznavanja zavajanja, hkrati pa se poveča tveganje za pojav izsiljenega priznanja. Zaradi naštetega bi bilo dobro, da se v praksi preneha z uporabo priročnikov. Izvirnost/pomembnost prispevka: Današnja znanstvena dognanja in sodobni standardi varovanja človekovih pravic zavračajo uporabo Reidove tehnike, zato bi bilo treba tudi v slovenski preiskovalni praksi čim prej prevzeti in prilagoditi sodobne modele preiskovalnega intervjuvanja.
Keywords:
zasliševanje
,
Reidova tehnika
,
kritična analiza
,
psevdoznanost
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year of publishing:
2013
Number of pages:
str. 398-407
Numbering:
Letn. 15, št. 3
PID:
20.500.12556/DKUM-76179
UDC:
159.9:340.6
ISSN on article:
1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:
2653674
NUK URN:
URN:SI:UM:DK:28JVWBSN
Publication date in DKUM:
21.04.2020
Views:
1034
Downloads:
65
Metadata:
Categories:
Misc.
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
AREH, Igor, 2013, Kritičen razmislek o Reidovi zasliševalski tehniki.
Varstvoslovje
[online]. 2013. Vol. 15, no. 3, p. 398–407. [Accessed 9 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=76179
Copy citation
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:
Voting is allowed only for
logged in
users.
Share:
Similar works from our repository:
False and coersed confessions among adolescents
INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES AND THEIR APPLICABILITY IN SLOVENIA
Scharff´s interrogation technique
Uporaba Reidove tehnike in pojav zmotnih priznanj
Critical review of marketing communication campaign in Mercator d.d.
Similar works from other repositories:
Kritični razmislek o absurdih ARRS
Critical reflection on the preschool reading programme
ǂA ǂcritical review of agriculture accounting regulation in Slovenia
Interrogation of terrorist suspects
ǂA ǂcritical review of cost allocation in the public sector: the case of the centre for social work
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Varstvoslovje
Shortened title:
Varstvoslovje
Publisher:
Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola, Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Republike Slovenije, Visoka policijsko-varnostna šola, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za policijsko-varnostne vede, Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za varnostne vede
ISSN:
1580-0253
COBISS.SI-ID:
99492352
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Licensing start date:
21.04.2020
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
A critical review of Reid's interrogation technique
Abstract:
Purpose: In Slovenia, forensic psychology is not a developed science and that may be one of the main reasons why coercive interrogation techniques are recklessly driven into a criminal investigation practice. The purpose of the paper is to critically evaluate Reid's interrogation technique in the context of forensic psychology. Findings: Coercive interrogation techniques like Reid’s are not used in Slovenia due to legislation limitations, which in comparison with the USA essentially restrict psychological manipulation with a suspect. Nevertheless an important share of interrogation knowledge of criminal investigators comes from commercial interrogation manuals, which are scientifically recognised as subjective and as common sense knowledge based on personal experiences of their authors. Interrogation manuals are misleadingly presented as scientific work, although they are founded on mostly unconfirmed assumptions and dubious research results, besides authors show obvious lack of elementary psychological and methodological knowledge. Practical implications: The main critiques of Reid's technique, which is the most noticeable representative of coercive interrogation techniques, are presented. Research done in the past decades shows that there is no scientific justification for applying such an interrogation technique. Results published in peer reviewed papers do not confirm assumptions and in some instances even disapprove claims which are presented in manuals. Criminal investigators who are using such knowledge have tendency to be over-confident and inefficient in recognition of deception, there is also a higher probability to extract a false confession during their work. Because of that it would be appropriate to stop using interrogation manuals of that kind. Originality/Value: On the base of today's scientific knowledge available and considering contemporary human rights standards, the use of Reid's interrogation technique (or even parts of it) is not justified. In Slovenia such an interrogation practises they should be completely rejected and new contemporary interrogation models of investigative interview should be considered.
Keywords:
interrogation
,
Reid's technique
,
critical analyses
,
pseudoscience
Collection
This document is a part of these collections:
Varstvoslovje
Comments
Leave comment
You must
log in
to leave a comment.
Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
There are no comments!
Back
