| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:Upoštevanje informacij, ki so jih zbrali detektivi kot dokaze v sodnih postopkih : diplomsko delo visokošolskega strokovnega študija Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Marzidošek, Tilen (Author)
ID Sotlar, Andrej (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Marzidosek_Tilen_2016.pdf (528,48 KB)
MD5: 385E05FAB54930823EA5B9FBC76F3062
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:S sprejetjem novega Zakona o detektivski dejavnosti leta 2011 se je detektivom delovno področje precej razširilo. Na podlagi novega zakona lahko detektivi pridobivajo informacije o pogrešanih osebah, povzročiteljih premoženjske in nepremoženjske škode, anonimnih pisanjih, dolžnikih, izgubljenih predmetih, spoštovanju konkurenčne klavzule, uspešnosti poslovnih subjektov, kaznivih dejanjih, ki se preganjajo na zasebno tožbo in dokaznem gradivu za naročnike. Z novimi področji dela detektivov, pa se postavlja vprašanje, ali detektivi svoje delo opravljajo v okviru zakonodaje. S tem mislimo predvsem na upoštevanje posameznikove pravice do zasebnosti. V diplomski nalogi smo preučevali končane sodne spise, pri katerih so dokazno gradivo zbrali detektivi. Sodni spis je celota vseh pisanj in njegovih prilog, ki se v okviru istovrstnih zadev nanašajo na isti subjekt. Večina sodnih spisov, katere smo predelali, so se nanašali na področje kršitev bolniške odsotnosti. Zbiranje podatkov od oseb ali iz javno dostopnih virov, uporaba tehničnih sredstev in osebna zaznava so metode dela, katerih se detektivi pri svojem delu največkrat poslužujejo. Za zbiranje dokaznega gradiva detektivi največkrat uporabljajo tehnična sredstva za slikovno in video snemanje. Ali sodišča v sodnih postopkih upoštevajo dokaze, katere so zbrali detektivi tekom dela, pa je odvisno od tega, ali so dokazi zbrani v okviru zakonodaje in ali so dokazi dovolj kvalitetni, da je iz njih mogoče identificirati kršitelja in njegovo kršitev. Raziskava je pokazala, da so sodniki v vseh sodnih postopkih sprejeli dokazno gradivo detektivov kot zakonito. To pomeni, da so detektivi v Republiki Sloveniji dobro podkovani z teoretičnim in praktičnim znanjem. Tega pa ne moramo trditi za Slovenske delodajalce. Iz raziskave smo ugotovili, da veliko število delodajalcev v pogodbe o zaposlitvi ne navede, da se lahko delavca nadzira med bolniškim staležem in da lahko delodajalec v primeru kršenja pravil pogodbe delavcu izredno ali redno odpove pogodbo o zaposlitvi. Delodajalci tudi niso upoštevali zakonskega časovnega okvirja za podajo odpovedi o zaposlitvi in pravico delavca, da se pred odpovedjo pogodbe o zaposlitvi izreče o očitani kršitvi. Prav tako bi morali delodajalci upoštevati, da pred odpovedjo pogodbe o zaposlitvi pridobijo dovoljenje inšpektorata za delo, da lahko delavcu zakonito odpovejo pogodbo o zaposlitvi ter da ne morajo odpovedati pogodbe o zaposlitvi osebam, ki so zaščitene z zakonom.
Keywords:zasebno varovanje, detektivi, detektivska dejavnost, pooblastila, dokazi, sodišča, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Place of performance:[Ljubljana
Publisher:T. Marzidošek]
Year of publishing:2016
Year of performance:2016
Number of pages:73 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-57555 New window
UDC:351.746.2(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3103978 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:DYJI3RYE
Publication date in DKUM:16.03.2016
Views:1757
Downloads:188
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
MARZIDOŠEK, Tilen, 2016, Upoštevanje informacij, ki so jih zbrali detektivi kot dokaze v sodnih postopkih : diplomsko delo visokošolskega strokovnega študija Varnost in policijsko delo [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Ljubljana : T. Marzidošek. [Accessed 18 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=57555
Copy citation
  
Average score:
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Searching for similar works...Please wait....
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Considering information collected by detectives as evidence in judicial proceedings
Abstract:In 2011, a new law was passed regarding detective work. With the Private Detective Services Act, detectives gained new entitlements. The new law allows detectives to collect information about missing people, perpetrators of pecuniary or non-pecuniary damages, anonymous letters, debtors, missing or lost objects, the adherence to the prohibition of competition and non-competition clauses, the performance and business operations of companies, offences prosecuted by private actions, and evidence. The new entitlements raise an important question: "Do detectives obey the law?" The proposed question mainly deals with the right to privacy. The practical part of this diploma thesis includes the study of completed judicial records, in which the presented evidence was collected by detectives. A judicial record consists of all documents and attachments related to the same court case. Most of court cases we considered were related to violations of 'sick leave'. Detectives use various methods when collecting information: collecting data from persons or publicly accessible sources, using technical means and engaging in surveillance. When collecting evidence, detectives usually use technical devices for capturing photographs and video recordings. Whether the courts will consider evidence collected by detectives or not depends on whether the evidence was collected within the framework of legislation and whether the perpetrator and his offence can be identified on the basis of the collected evidence. The result of the research shows that judges in judicial proceedings consider evidence presented by detectives as legally obtained. This proves that detectives in Slovenia are well-trained and educated. However, we cannot claim the same for Slovenian employers. The results of the research show that many employment contracts do not include articles on supervising the employees on sick leave and on the consequences of violating the contract. Employers often do not follow the law when terminating the employment contract: in some cases presented in the thesis, the employers terminated the contracts without informing the employees beforehand; in other cases, the employers even gave notice to people protected by the law.
Keywords:Keywords: detective work, courts, judicial records, detective evidence, sick leave.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica