| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Pravni koncepti v luči nevroznanosti : nevrološka podlaga nerazsodnosti in duševnega zdravja
Authors:ID Magyar, Denis (Author)
Files:.pdf Pravni+koncepti+v+luci+nevroznanosti_+nevroloska+podlaga+nerazsodnosti+in+dusevnega+zdravja.pdf (683,18 KB)
MD5: DE2DAEF992C422A1E76C5E9D1E8CE253
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Unknown
Typology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Predmetni prispevek obravnava nevrološko podlago nerazsodnosti in duševnega zdravja. Ugotovitev, da je posameznik nerazsoden, je pomembna za številna področja civilnega prava. Koncept nerazsodnosti je obravnavan v povezavi z deliktno in poslovno sposobnostjo ter oporočno in ženitno sposobnostjo kot posebni vrsti poslovne sposobnosti. Tudi duševno zdravje je dejstvo, ki se ugotavlja v dokaznem postopku. Od njegovega obstoja je odvisna dopustnost »prisilne hospitalizacije«, ki predstavlja velik poseg v človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine. Ker sta nerazsodnost in duševno zdravje – kot pravna koncepta – izrazito subjektivne narave, njihovo ugotavljanje zahteva zanesljivo objektivizacijo. Avtor zastopa stališče, da uporaba nevroznanstvenih odkritij lahko poveča zanesljivost ugotavljanja pravno relevantnih subjektivnih dejstev. »Objektivizacijo subjektivnega« omogoča nevroznanost, katere odkritja so že uporabna v dokazne namene. Nadaljnji razvoj bo zmanjšal pomanjkljivosti nevroznanosti, zato se bo zanesljivost nevroznanstvenih odkritij povečala. S tem bodo nevroznanstvena odkritja postala pomemben del objektivizacije subjektivnih dejstev v civilnih postopkih.
Keywords:nevroznanost, nevropravo, subjektivna dejstva, »objektivizacija subjektivnega«, nerazsodnost, duševno zdravje
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2024
Number of pages:Str. 455-494
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-94396 New window
UDC:347.94
COBISS.SI-ID:182208771 New window
DOI:10.18690/um.pf.1.2024.15 New window
Publication date in DKUM:18.08.2025
Views:0
Downloads:3
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:Studia Iuridica Miscellanea : MMXXI
Editors:Martina Repas
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba
Year of publishing:2024
ISBN:978-961-286-817-8
COBISS.SI-ID:179685123 New window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Pravni koncepti v luči nevroznanosti: nevrološka podlaga nerazsodnosti in duševnega zdravja
Abstract:The present article discusses the neurological basis of impaired judgement and mental health. The finding that an individual has impaired judgement is important for many areas of civil evidence law. In the present article the concept of impaired judgement is discussed in connection with the ability of tort and legal capacity, including testamentary and marital capacity. Mental health is also a fact that is ascertained in evidentiary procedures, since the absence of mental health is a precondition for »involuntary hospitalization«, which represents a major interference with human rights and fundamental freedoms. However, impaired judgement and mental health - as legal concepts - are highly subjective facts in nature. In order to ascertain those facts, the court has to achieve their reliable objectification. The author argues that the use of neuroscientific discoveries can increase the reliability in ascertaining legally relevant subjective facts. The »objectification of the subjective« is made possible by neuroscientific discoveries, which are already useful for evidentiary purposes. Further development will reduce the disadvantages of neuroscience, and therefore the reliability of neuroscientific discoveries will increase. With this, neuroscientific discoveries will become an important part of the objectification of subjective facts in civil procedures.
Keywords:neuroscience, neurolaw, subjective facts, »objectification of subjective«, impaired judgement, mental health


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica