| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:The role and position of AI evidence in civil litigation
Authors:ID Sokolova, Mariia (Author)
Files:URL https://journals.um.si/index.php/medicine/article/view/2761
 
.pdf cervek_m,+7_sokolova_(1).pdf (425,45 KB)
MD5: FFF7590C57DADCF07CF9E969B1D4C74A
 
Language:English
Work type:Unknown
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:This article examines the role and position of AI evidence in civil litigation. Despite the sporadic appearance of such evidence in court proceedings, it has the potential to revolutionize the evidential field and change our understanding of the nature and evidential qualities of existing types of evidence. After a thorough examination of the key technical specifications of AI, different classifications of AI evidence and various approaches to treatment of AI evidence, the author suggests how AI evidence should be treated according to the Slovenian Civil Procedure law. It is inferred that standard evidence rules can be applied to AI evidence, if the probative value of such evidence does not depend on the AI involved. In cases where probative value of evidence depends on the involved AI system, AI evidence can nevertheless be treated as witness or expert evidence, or, precisely, as ex parte affidavit or private expert opinion depending on the level of human or AI contribution to the content of AI evidence. The author concludes that black box and bias problems of AI systems generating evidence have to be properly addressed in order for AI evidence to achieve full evidential value and reliability.
Keywords:artificial intelligence, AI evidence, electronic evidence, civil procedure, machine evidence
Publication date:01.04.2023
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:str. 169-190
Numbering:Vol. 16, no. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-91052 New window
UDC:347.9:004.8
ISSN on article:2463-7955
COBISS.SI-ID:210974979 New window
DOI:10.18690/mls.16.1.169-190.2023 New window
Publication date in DKUM:28.08.2025
Views:0
Downloads:3
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Medicine, law & society
Publisher:Pravna fakulteta, Pravna fakulteta, University of Maribor Press
ISSN:2463-7955
COBISS.SI-ID:281851136 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:Članek preučuje vlogo in položaj dokazov z umetno inteligenco (UI) v civilnih sodnih postopkih. Kljub občasnemu pojavljanju takšnih dokazov v sodnih postopkih, lahko le-ti povzročijo revolucijo na področju dokazovanja ter spremenijo naše razumevanje narave in dokaznih lastnosti obstoječih vrst dokazov. Po temeljiti preučitvi ključnih tehničnih specifikacij UI, različnih klasifikacij dokazov UI in različnih pristopov k obravnavi dokazov UI, avtor predlaga, kako bi bilo treba dokaze UI obravnavati v skladu s slovensko zakonodajo o civilnem postopku. Sklepamo, da se lahko za dokaze z UI uporabljajo standardna dokazna pravila, če dokazna vrednost teh dokazov ni odvisna od zadevne UI. V primerih, ko je dokazna vrednost dokazov odvisna od vključenega sistema UI, se lahko dokazi z UI kljub temu obravnavajo kot dokazi prič ali izvedencev, natančneje kot pisna izjava ex parte ali zasebno izvedensko mnenje, odvisno od stopnje prispevka človeka ali UI k vsebini dokazov z UI. Avtor ugotavlja, da je treba ustrezno obravnavati težave črne skrinjice in pristranskosti sistemov UI, ki ustvarjajo dokaze, da bi dokazi UI dosegli polno dokazno vrednost in zanesljivost.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica