| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Miti, kritike, prednosti in pomanjkljivosti evolucijske psihologije v sociološki perspektivi : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Bertalanič, Jure (Author)
ID Rutar, Tibor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Bertalanic_Jure_2023.pdf (786,27 KB)
MD5: 1B8517F63362B48505B704D73B213A04
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:V magistrskem delu z naslovom Miti, kritike, prednosti in pomanjkljivosti evolucijske psihologije v sociološki perspektivi orišemo področje sodobne evolucijske psihologije in njene temeljne teze, predpostavke, načela in omejitve, pod katerimi delujejo raziskovalci na tem področju. Orišemo kratko zgodovino znanstvenega področja in pojasnjujemo razliko med evolucijsko psihologijo in sociobiologijo, dvema ločenima disciplinama, ki se pogosto prepletata. Nato prikažemo nekaj ključnih konceptov področja, kot so univerzalna človeška narava in evolucijske prilagoditve, ter ponazorimo, kako se ti koncepti uporabljajo za opisovanje izvora človeških in družbenih fenomenov. Naslednji del magistrskega dela obravnava temeljne mehanizme evolucijske psihologije, pri čemer standardni družboslovni model, katerega uporaba v sodobni sociologiji prevladuje, primerjamo z integrativnim modelom, ki ga uporabljajo evolucijski psihologi. Večji del je posvečen konceptu modularnosti uma in njegovi konceptualni veljavnosti. Nazadnje ponazorimo običajne kritike evolucijske psihologije iz vrste akademskih disciplin in jih damo pod drobnogled ter ugotavljamo, katere kritike so veljavne in katere napačno označujejo ali napačno razlagajo dejanske razlagalne mehanizme tega področja.
Keywords:evolucijska psihologija, sociologija, sociobiologija, determinizem, človeška narava
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:J. Bertalanič
Year of publishing:2023
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (72 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-85259 New window
UDC:316.244:[575.8:159.9](043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:166870019 New window
Publication date in DKUM:04.10.2023
Views:465
Downloads:57
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:23.08.2023

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Myths, criticisms, advantages and shortcomings of evolutionary psychology from a sociological perspective
Abstract:In the master's thesis entitled Myths, Criticisms, Advantages and Shortcomings of Evolutionary Psychology from a Sociological Perspective, we depict the field of contemporary Evolutionary Psychology and outline the core theses, presumptions, principles and constraints under which the researchers within the field operate. We outline a brief history of the scientific field and clarify the distinction between Evolutionary Psychology and Sociobiology, two separate disciplines that are often embroiled. We then portray some of the field’s key concepts, such as universal human nature and evolutionary adaptations, and illustrate how these concepts are used within the field’s framework to describe the origins of human and societal phenomena. The next section of the thesis deals with the fundamental mechanisms of Evolutionary Psychology, whereby we contrast the Standard Social Science Model, the use of which is predominant in contemporary Sociology, with the Integrative Model used by evolutionary psychologists. A larger section is devoted to the concept of modularity of the mind and its conceptual validity. Lastly, we investigate common criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology from a range of academic disciplines and put those under scrutiny, determining which criticisms are valid and which mischaracterize or misinterpret the field’s de facto explanatory mechanisms.
Keywords:Evolutionary Psychology, Sociology, Sociobiology, Determinism, Human Nature


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica