| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Prezasedenost zaporov v Evropi : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Authors:ID Ličen, Loti (Author)
ID Hacin, Rok (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Licen_Loti_2023.pdf (1,07 MB)
MD5: E1E8538103155825D5DC7C6C7E460CA8
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V zaključnem delu je predstavljena primerjava zasedenosti zaporov med evropskimi državami. V prvem delu diplomskega dela je bil preučen pojem prezasedenosti, ki se pojavi, ko število zapornikov preseže uradno zmogljivost zapora. Hkrati je bil predstavljen tudi standard za najmanjšo površino življenjskega prostora, ki naj bi ga imel zapornik na voljo. Pri tem je treba opozoriti, da ta standard ni mednarodno sprejet. To je tudi eden izmed razlogov, zakaj prihaja do prezasedenosti. V drugem delu diplomske naloge je bila z analizo statističnih podatkov predstavljena (pre)zasedenost zaporov glede na število zaprtih oseb na 100 mest, stopnja zaprtih oseb na 100.000 prebivalcev, število pripornikov ter zapornikov med leti 2010 in 2020. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je v splošnem prezasedenost v zaporih evropskih držav v preučevanem obdobju upadala. V obdobju 2010–2022 zgolj deset evropskih držav ni imelo prezasedenih zaporov: Latvija, Lihtenštajn, Luksemburg, Monako, Nemčija, Nizozemska, Norveška, Poljska, Slovaška in Velika Britanija (Anglija in Wales). Zaporsko populacijo in s tem prezasedenost zaporov je možno zmanjšati na tri načine. Prvi način predstavlja upravni odziv, ki vključuje gradnjo novih zaporov; drugi način predstavlja predhodne strategije, ki vsebujejo večjo uporabo alternativnih kazni, in tretji način predstavljajo zaledne strategije, ki pomagajo zmanjšati prezasedenost zaporov s pomočjo amnestije.
Keywords:zapori, zaporniki, priporniki, prezasedenost zaporov, evropske države, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:L. Ličen
Year of publishing:2023
Year of performance:2023
Number of pages:VI f., [35] str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-85118 New window
UDC:343.812(4)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:165424899 New window
Publication date in DKUM:22.09.2023
Views:424
Downloads:76
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:18.08.2023

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Prison overcrowding in Europe
Abstract:The bachelor’s thesis presents a comparison of prison occupancy rates between European countries. In the first part of the thesis, we examined the concept of overcrowding which occurs when the number of prisoners exceeds the official capacity of the prison. Moreover, we presented standards for the minimum amount of living space that a prisoner should have available. It should be noted that this standard is not internationally accepted. This is also one of the reasons why overcrowding occurs. In the second part of the bachelor’s thesis, through the analysis of statistical data, we presented the overcrowding of prisons according to the number of imprisoned persons per 100 places, prison population rates, detainees rates and convicted persons rates in European countries in the period 2010–2020. Findings show that overcrowding was decreasing over the observed period. In the period 2010–2020, only ten European countries have not recorded overcrowding in prisons: Latvia, Lichtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovakia and Great Britain (England and Wales). There are three ways to reduce the prison population and consequently prison overcrowding. The first way represents an administrative response involving the construction of new prisons. The second represents upstream strategies involving the increased use of alternative sentences, and the third represents back-end strategies that help reduce overcrowding through amnesty.
Keywords:overcrowding, imprisoned persons, detainees, prisoners, European countries


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica