| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Možgansko slikanje v sodnih postopkih : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Cerjak, Ada (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Cerjak_Ada_2021.pdf (535,22 KB)
MD5: CBD61478B01667168192FC7FFF68B250
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/5dae843c-72c9-41c0-9255-555cf8f0bcfa
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Razvoj tehnologije in metod, ki se uporabljajo v nevroznanstvene namene, se povečujejo iz dneva v dan. Možganske slike so zgolj ena izmed načinov uporabe nevroznanosti, ki predstavljajo tako napredek kot tudi potrebo po razumevanju samega delovanje in regulacija. Nevroznanost v sodnih postopkih sicer ni nov pojav, vendar je zaradi samega poznavanja zgodovine potrebna regulacija in razprava o sami uporabi možganskih slik v sodnih postopkih. Obstajajo tako pravne, etične in socialne dileme, povezane z možganskimi slikami zaradi možnosti zlorabe uporabljenih tehnologij, zaščite zasebnosti in priljubljenosti pri laični javnosti. Možganske slike imajo zaradi svoje barvitosti in estetike prav posebno mesto pri odločevalci, zato je nujno razumevanje teh tehnologij in pravilna interpretacija. Dileme med strokovnjaki iz prava in nevroznanosti prihajajo zlasti, zaradi neskladnega dojemanja posameznikov. Pravna stroka trdi, da je posameznik racionalni agent, ki ima svobodno voljo in je sam ogovoren za svoja dejanja, medtem ko nevroznanstveniki, ljudi obravnavajo iz bolj determinističnega pogleda in izhajajo iz posameznikovega živčnega sistem in njegovega delovanja. Končni produkt nevroslik nam daje občutek razumevanja in nezmotljivosti, saj je fizično vidna aktivnost, vendar je tehnologija, ki je uporabljena za nastanek nevroslike kompleksnejša in za njo stojijo številni postopki. Postopki, s katerimi pridobimo končni produkt vsebuje temeljito in pravilno statistično analizo, pri kateri je manevrski prostor za napake velik, kar posledično vpliva na rezultat. Zavedati se je potrebno, da so možganske slike v uporabi šele dve desetletji in da je potrebno še ogromno študij, ki bodo potrdile, da so same metode za izdelavo končnega produkta, uporabljene pri različnih tehnikah nevroslikanja verodostojne in zanesljive.
Keywords:nevroznanost, preučevanje možganov, nevroslike, sodni procesi, kazenska odgovornost, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[A. Cerjak]
Year of publishing:2021
Year of performance:2021
Number of pages:VI f., 37 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-79707 New window
UDC:340.6(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:77514243 New window
Publication date in DKUM:23.09.2021
Views:898
Downloads:97
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:12.08.2021

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Neuroimaging in court proceedings
Abstract:The development of technology and methods used for neuroscientific purposes is increasing day by day. Brain imaging is just one way of using neuroscience, representing both progress and the need to understand functioning and regulation itself. Neuroscience in court proceedings is not a new phenomenon, but the very knowledge of history requires regulation and discussion of the use of brain images in court proceedings. There are both legal, ethical, and social dilemmas associated with brain imagery, due to the potential for abuse of these technologies, protection of privacy, and popularity with the lay public. Due to their color and aesthetics, brain images have a special place in decision-makers, so it is necessary to understand these technologies and correct interpretation. Dilemmas between legal and neuroscience experts arise in particular, due to inconsistent perceptions of individuals. The legal profession argues that the individual is a rational agent who has free will and is accountable for his actions, while neuroscientists treat people from a more deterministic point of view and derive from the individual’s nervous system and its functioning. The final product of neuroimages gives us a sense of understanding and infallibility, as it is a physically visible activity, but the technology used to create the neuroimage is more complex and involves many procedures. The procedures by which the final product is obtained contain a thorough and correct statistical analysis in which the room for maneuver for errors is large, which consequently affects the result. It is necessary to be aware that brain images have only been in use for two decades and that a huge amount of study is still needed to confirm that the methods themselves used in the technique are credible and reliable.
Keywords:neuroscience, court proceedings, neuroimaging, criminal responsibility


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica