| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Primerjava pristopov k vpeljavi celovitih informacijskih rešitev : magistrsko delo
Authors:ID Visočnik, Kevin (Author)
ID Heričko, Marjan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Visocnik_Kevin_2020.pdf (2,04 MB)
MD5: 3C9736862D61FA12411FA8FA4AFE1053
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/04fb2849-cf7a-446f-a15c-62ec40b2fbc2
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Abstract:V magistrski nalogi smo se osredotočili na raziskovanje področja različnih pristopov k vpeljevanju celovitih informacijskih rešitev in njihovo medsebojno primerjavo. S pomočjo obstoječe literature smo raziskali najbolj uporabljene metodologije v projektih ERP. Na voljo je veliko različnih metodologij, vendar ugotavljamo, da vse niso uveljavljene ali pa primerne za posamezne rešitve ERP. Najprej smo posamezne pristope raziskali in predstavili njihove značilnosti, nato pa smo se usmerili v proučevanje ključnih faktorjev uspeha in neuspeha projektov ERP. Zatem smo izbrali tri metodologije, ki se najpogosteje uporabljajo in so najbolje raziskane, ter jih med seboj primerjali in analizirali. Sestavili smo tudi kratki vprašalnik ter ga aplicirali na treh osebah, ki imajo veliko izkušenj z izbrano metodologijo, dodatno pa smo se poslužili še krajšega intervjuja s projektnim vodjem. Ugotovili smo, da se, pri projektih ERP, v večji meri uporabljajo starejše in že uveljavljene metodologije, v primerjavi z novejšimi ter prenovljenimi, ki se uporabljajo redkeje. Raziskane lastnosti metodologij kažejo na to, da so si v osnovah, iz katerih izhajajo, precej podobne, razlikujejo pa se v specifikah.
Keywords:informacijski sistemi, rešitve ERP, implementacija, metodologije vpeljave, ASAP, Oracle AIM, Microsoft Sure Step
Place of publishing:Maribor
Place of performance:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Visočnik]
Year of publishing:2020
Number of pages:VII, 93 f.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-78357 New window
UDC:004.4.272:658.61(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:47541507 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:B5TMVHQ9
Publication date in DKUM:06.01.2021
Views:1196
Downloads:173
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:KTFMB - FERI
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Description:A Creative Commons license that bans commercial use and requires the user to release any modified works under this license.
Licensing start date:13.12.2020

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of approaches to enterprise resource planning implementation
Abstract:In the master's thesis we explored the areas of different methodologies to enterprise resource planning implementation and their comparison. Using the literature, we explored the most commonly used methodologies used in ERP projects. There are many different methodologies available, but we found out that not all of them are established or suitable for individual ERP solutions.. First we described the individual methodologies and presented their characteristics. This was followed by a short chapter on the key success and failure factors of ERP projects. We then selected the three most commonly used and best researched methodologies and compared and analyzed them with each other. We also compiled a short questionnaire and applied it to three people who have a lot of experience with the chosen methodology, and we additionally used a short interview with the project manager. We found out that in ERP projects, older and already established methodologies are used to a greater extent, compared to newer and renewed ones, which are used less frequently. The researched properties of the methodologies show that they are quite similar in the bases from which they are derived, but they differ in specifics.
Keywords:information systems, implementation, implementation methodologies, ASAP, Oracle AIM, Microsoft Sure Step


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica