| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document

Title:Ergonomska analiza delovnega mesta na bencinskem servisu
Authors:Medved, Tilen (Author)
Balantič, Zvonko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Medved_Tilen_2020.pdf (3,43 MB)
MD5: 2F078A906F83D68CBBD9C55158F5FDC4
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FOV - Faculty of Organizational Sciences in Kranj
Abstract:V današnjem času ima ergonomija pri organizaciji delovnih mest velik pomen, saj so podjetja, ki vlagajo v dobro delovno izkušnjo svojih delavcev, uspešnejša od konkurence. Pravilno ergonomsko oblikovano delovno mesto je ključ do večje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti v podjetjih. Ergonomska načela trdijo, da je prilagoditev delovnega mesta človeku zelo pomembna pri oblikovanju delovnega prostora, saj s tem zmanjšamo negativne posledice določenega dela. V diplomski nalogi se osredotočamo na bencinski servis Petrol, d. d., saj menimo, da delovno mesto potrebuje celostno ergonomsko analizo. Delovno mesto smo obravnavali s pomočjo različnih metod, ki nam ponuja ergonomija: OWAS, REBA in vprašalnik CMDQ. Rezultate metod smo med seboj primerjali in ugotavljali, katero stanje kaže najbolj realno sliko. Ugotovili smo, da rezultatom metode REBA ne smemo predpisati velike veljavnosti, saj smo z njo pregledali le najbolj kritične točke delovnega mesta, ki se pri delovnem procesu redko pojavljajo. Menimo, da so rezultati metode OWAS in vprašalnika CMDQ ustreznejši, zato smo jih podrobno pregledali. Opazili smo kar nekaj ujemanj, vendar smo na koncu za najustreznejšo metodo izbrali OWAS. Razlog za to je v dokaj majhnem vzorcu vprašalnika ter neskladnosti pri določenih telesnih segmentih. Izbor metode OWAS kot najustreznejše nam pove, da je delovno mesto ustrezno ergonomsko oblikovano. Glede na rezultate metode REBA in vprašalnika CMDQ smo podali predloge izboljšav, ki pripomorejo k boljši ergonomski izoblikovanosti delovnega mesta.
Keywords:ergonomija, ergonomska analiza, OWAS, REBA, CMDQ
Year of publishing:2020
Source:Maribor
COBISS_ID:36887555 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:ZPWOR141
Views:224
Downloads:101
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FOV
:
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:17.08.2020

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Ergonomic analysis of a gas station workplace
Abstract:Nowadays, ergonomics is of great importance in the organization of jobs, as companies that invest in the good work experience of their employees are more successful than the competition. Properly ergonomically designed workplace is the key to greater performance and efficiency in companies. Ergonomic principles state that the adaptation of the workplace to the person is very important in the design of the workspace, as this reduces the negative consequences of a particular job. In the diploma thesis we focus on the gas station Petrol, d. d., as we believe that the workplace needs a comprehensive ergonomic analysis. We addressed the workplace using a variety of methods offered by ergonomics: OWAS, REBA, and the CMDQ questionnaire. We compared the results of the methods and determined which condition shows the most realistic picture. We found that the results of the REBA method should not be given much validity, as it examined only the most critical points of the workplace, which rarely occur in the work process. We believe that the results of the OWAS method and the CMDQ questionnaire are more appropriate, so we have reviewed them in detail. We noticed quite a few matches, but in the end we chose OWAS as the most appropriate method. The reason for this is in the rather small sample of the questionnaire and the discrepancies in certain body segments. The choice of the OWAS method as the most appropriate tells us that the workplace is appropriately ergonomically designed. Based on the results of the REBA method and the CMDQ questionnaire, we made suggestions for upgrades that help to improve the ergonomic design of the workplace.
Keywords:ergonomics, ergonomic analysis, OWAS, REBA, CMDQ


Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica