| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Policijsko zbiranje obvestil in zaslišanje osumljenca : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Varnost in policijsko delo
Authors:ID Rehar, Aljoša (Author)
ID Žaberl, Miroslav (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Rehar_Aljosa_2020.pdf (512,24 KB)
MD5: 6A234D18BE36FD4CD8D4051820F6D6EC
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/5ee30db4-6995-4f1a-b121-d07c99c616b9
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V diplomskem delu smo ugotavljali, kakšna je razlika med institutom policijskega zbiranja obvestil osumljenca in institutom policijskega zaslišanja osumljenca v predkazenskem postopku. V prvem delu diplomske naloge je na kratko definiran predkazenski postopek, za tem je opredeljen pomen testimonialnih dokazov oziroma dokazov, prejetih s pomočjo pričevanj, temu pa sledi definicija in razlaga vabljenja, enega glavnih pooblastil policistov, ki se navezuje na zaslišanje osumljenca. Na koncu tega dela diplomske naloge je opredeljen osredotočen sum, besedna zveza, ki jo policisti uporabijo, ko osebo obravnavajo kot edinega možnega storilca kaznivega dejanja. Da so bile ugotovljene glavne razlike med policijskim zbiranjem obvestil osumljenca in policijskim zaslišanjem osumljenca, sta morali biti ti dve fazi policijskega postopka zakonsko opredeljeni. Tako so v nadaljevanju naloge razloženi normativna ureditev, pravice osumljenca, potek zaslišanja in napake, ki jih policisti naredijo ob zaslišanju, kar lahko privede do izločitve nekaterih dokazov. Nazadnje so bile pregledane odločbe ustavnih sodišč, s čim je bilo na praktičnih primerih preverjeno, kje pristanejo dokumenti, pridobljeni v predkazenskem postopku, kakšno moč imajo za nadaljnji kazenski postopek, voden s strani sodišča in kakšne napake nastanejo v postopku zbiranja dokazov. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da zelo pomembno vlogo v predkazenskem postopku igrajo policisti, ki morajo pri svojem delu biti pozorni, da ne naredijo napak, saj te lahko privedejo do kršitve človekovih pravic in posledično izločitve dokazov, in da obstaja razlika v dokazni vrednosti izjav, glede na navzočnost zagovornika pri zaslišanju.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, predkazenski postopek, zbiranje obvestil, zaslišanje, osumljenec, policija
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[A. Rehar]
Year of publishing:2020
Year of performance:2020
Number of pages:VI, 40 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-76183 New window
UDC:351.741:343.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:19349251 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:9DCLMWFL
Publication date in DKUM:12.06.2020
Views:1265
Downloads:259
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Police gathering of informations and interrogation of suspect
Abstract:In this thesis we were researching the difference between the institute of police information gathering and police interrogation of suspect in pre-trial proceedings. First part of the diploma paper briefly defines the pre-trial procedure, followed by definition of testimonial evidence or evidence obtained through testimony and definition with interpretation of invitations, which is one of the main police authorizations in interrogation process. At the end of this part of the thesis phrase ’focused suspicion’ is defined as it is commonly used by police officers when treating a person as the only possible offender. In order to identify main differences between police gathering of information and police interrogation of suspect, these two stages of the pre-trial procedure had to be legally defined. Subsequently normative regulation, rights of a suspect, course of the hearing and errors in police interrogation that can lead to exclusion of evidence are explained. Finally, decisions of the constitutional courts have been reviewed, which showcases, based on practical examples, where the documents from pre-trial procedure are being held, what power they have for further criminal proceedings and what errors occur in the process of gathering evidence. It has been discovered that police officers play an important role in pre-trial procedure, however they have to pay attention not to make mistakes, as this can lead to human rights violations which can cause elimination of evidence. It has also been found that a difference in probative value of suspects statement occurs if a counsel is present at the hearing.
Keywords:pre-trial procedure, gathering of information, interrogation, the suspect, the police


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica