| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Analiza alarmov v perioperativnem zdravljenju
Authors:ID Perko, Helena (Author)
ID Križmarić, Miljenko (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Lah Topolšek, Aleksandra (Comentor)
Files:.pdf MAG_Perko_Helena_2020.pdf (1,31 MB)
MD5: A4F978B6F2E4249E00E06EE1140CE6AD
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/6b9119b2-c98e-4689-954b-cbf4822ec27c
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FZV - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:Uvod: Alarmi v perioperativnem zdravljenju imajo veliko vlogo pri prepoznavanju življenjsko ogrožajočih stanj, ki bi lahko privedla tudi do smrti bolnika. Zaposleni so kot glavni uporabniki alarmnih sistemov izpostavljeni velikemu številu alarmov, ki se zgodijo v času zdravstvene oskrbe bolnikov. Namen naloge je bil ugotoviti pogostost proženja različnih alarmov na anestezijskih delovnih postajah, kliničnih monitorjih in infuzijskih črpalkah. Metode: Uporabili smo kvantitativno metodologijo. Podatke smo pridobili s pomočjo metode opazovanja, kjer smo z analizo zgodovine sproženih alarmov na vzorcu 13 anestezijskih delovnih postaj, 12 kliničnih monitorjev in 5 infuzijskih črpalkah analizirali zgodovine alarmov. Rezultati: Z analizo podatkov smo ugotovili, da je bilo skupno aktiviranih 994 alarmov. 79 % je bilo tistih z nizko prioriteto, 17 % s srednjo prioriteto in 4 % alarmov z visoko prioriteto. Na 13 anestezijskih delovnih postajah se je v povprečnih 8 urah aktiviralo 318 (32 %) alarmov. Monitor za spremljanje življenjskih funkcij je zabeležil skupno 662 (66,6 %) alarmov in infuzijske črpalke so sprožile 14 (1,4 %) vseh alarmov. Razprava in sklep: Ugotovili smo, da je v perioperativnem zdravljenju veliko število alarmov z nizkimi prioritetami; največ alarmov je bilo sproženih s strani kliničnih monitorjev; najmanj alarmov so aktivirale infuzijske črpalke.
Keywords:alarm, monitoring, perioperativna zdravstvena nega.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[H. Perko]
Year of publishing:2020
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-75711 New window
UDC:615.471:616-089.8(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:2568356 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:9G2UDN8N
Publication date in DKUM:19.02.2020
Views:1487
Downloads:231
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FZV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:21.01.2020

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Analysis of alarms in perioperative treatment
Abstract:Introduction: Alarms in perioperative treatment play a major role in identifying life-threatening conditions that could also lead to patient death. As the main users of alarm systems, employees are exposed to a large number of alarms that occur during patient healthcare. The purpose of the task was to determine the frequency of triggering of various alarms at anesthesia workstations, clinical monitors, and infusion pumps. Methods: We used a quantitative methodology. The data were obtained by means of an observation method where the history of alarms was analyzed using a sample of 13 anesthesia workstations, 12 clinical monitors, and 5 infusion pumps. Results: Data analysis revealed that a total of 994 alarms were activated. 79 % were of low priority, 17 % of medium priority, and 4% of high priority alarms. At the anesthesia workstations, 318 (32 %) alarms were activated in an average of 8 hours. The Life Function Monitor recorded a total of 662 (66.6%) alarms and infusion pumps triggered 14 (1.4 %) of all alarms. Discussion and Conclusion: We found that in the perioperative treatment, there was a high number of low priority alarms. Most alarms were triggered by clinical monitors and the least alarms were activated by infusion pumps.
Keywords:alarm, monitoring, perioperative nursing


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica