| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Primerjava poročil o delu policije in državnega tožilstva za leti 2012 in 2017 : diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Informacijska varnost
Authors:ID Ludvik, Melita (Author)
ID Dvoršek, Anton (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf VS_Ludvik_Melita_2019.pdf (1009,03 KB)
MD5: 878A91087593F2AD87145FC5420FB7AB
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/f70f0679-1f1b-4bb3-b24c-5af95c5af93f
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Živimo v času, ko je zagrešenih kaznivih dejanj zelo veliko, o tem mediji poročajo praktično vsak dan. Vse pogosteje se pojavljajo organiziran kriminal, trgovina z orožjem in mamili ter pranje denarja, a druga kazniva dejanja ne zaostajajo. Glede na storjena dejanja je ovadenih relativno malo osumljencev, še manjše je število obtoženih in še nižje število pravnomočno obsojenih. V predkazenskem delu preiskovanja je v središču delo policije in njena učinkovitost, delu policije pa sledi delo državnega tožilca in sodišča. Skozi sita posameznih udeležencev postopka se število osumljencev, obtožencev in obsojencev močno zmanjša. Temu osipu pravimo kriminalitetni lijak. V okviru diplomskega dela je bila opravljena primerjalna analiza statističnih podatkov policije in državnega tožilstva za leti 2012 in 2017. Direktne primerjave so skorajda nemogoče, saj se zajemanje podatkov obeh institucij zelo razlikuje. Na podlagi podatkov je bilo kljub temu ugotovljeno, da le manjši del kaznivih dejanj sproži ustrezno sodbo. Od vseh zaznanih kaznivih dejanj je bilo obsojenih osumljencev zelo malo, le 1,5 % pa jih je prestajalo tudi zaporno kazen. Vrhovno državno tožilstvo pojasnjuje, da državno tožilstvo zavrže velik del ovadb, in sicer predvsem zaradi nezadostne dokazne podlage za utemeljen sum.
Keywords:diplomske naloge, kaznivo dejanje, predkazenski postopek, sodišče, kriminal, zaporna kazen
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Ludvik]
Year of publishing:2019
Year of performance:2019
Number of pages:VII, 42 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-75392 New window
UDC:343.1(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3825898 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:I2IGKXVQ
Publication date in DKUM:15.01.2020
Views:919
Downloads:204
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of reports on the work of the police and the public prosecutor
Abstract:We live in a time when many criminal offences are committed and the media reports about them on a daily basis. This is becoming increasingly true of organised crime, arms trade, drug trafficking, and money laundering, with other criminal offences not too far behind. According to the offences committed, relatively few suspects are accused or charged and even less are convicted. The pre-trial part of the investigation focuses on the work and effectiveness of the police, followed by the work of the state prosecutor and the court. By screening individual participants in the proceedings the number of suspects, accused, and convicted persons is greatly reduced. We call this decrease a crime funnel. A comparative analysis of the statistical data of the police and the state prosecutor's office for 2012 and 2017 was conducted, but direct comparisons are almost impossible since the data capture of the two institutions varies significantly. Based on the data we have found that only a small proportion of the offences result in a proper verdict. Of all the criminal offences committed very few suspects were convicted and only 1.5% were imprisoned. The Office of the State Prosecutor General explains that the state prosecutor's office dismisses a large part of the charges, mainly because of insufficient evidence to support a reasonable suspicion.
Keywords:criminal offence, pre-trial process, court, crime, prison sentence


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica