SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document

Title:Velikih pet osebnostnih dimenzij in tvegano vedenje
Authors:Brdnik, Monika (Author)
Benedik, Emil (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Brdnik_Monika_2019.pdf (1,38 MB)
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper (mb22)
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Abstract:Namen tega magistrskega dela je bil preveriti povezave med velikimi petimi osebnostnimi dimenzijami, izbranimi oblikami tveganega vedenja in zaznavo tveganosti vedenja. Dodatno so bile ugotavljane tudi povezave med že naštetimi konstrukti, spolom, starostjo in religioznostjo. Vzorec je sestavljalo 187 udeležencev. Za preverjanje velikih petih osebnostnih dimenzij je bil uporabljen vprašalnik BFI (John, Donahue in Kentle, 1991), za preverjanje tveganega vedenja in njegove zaznave vprašalnik DOSPERT (Blais in Weber, 2006), za preverjanje tveganega uživanja alkohola vprašalnik AUDIT-C, za preverjanje religioznosti, kajenja in uživanja prepovedanih substanc so bila sestavljena lastna vprašanja. Ugotovljene so bile razlike v zaznavanju tveganega vedenja in v udeleževanju v tveganih vedenjih med spoloma – ženske so vedenja zaznavale kot bolj tvegana, medtem ko so se moški bili bolj pripravljeni udeleževati v različnih vrstah tveganega vedenja. Pri obeh spolih je bilo ugotovljeno, da zaznava tveganosti posameznih vedenj s starostjo narašča, udeleževanje v le-teh pa upada. Ugotovljene so bile razlike med nereligioznimi in religioznimi posamezniki, saj so bili slednji manj pripravljeni tvegati. Opažena je bila tudi precejšnja razširjenost tveganega uživanja alkohola (prisotno v 46,5% celotnega vzorca). Kljub poskusom na podlagi osebnostnih dimenzij ni bilo možno sklepati o signifikantni napovedni vrednosti za tvegana vedenja. Odkrite so bile pozitivne povezave med odprtostjo, ekstravertnostjo in skupnim tveganim vedenjem, medtem ko med skupnim tveganim vedenjem, nevroticizmom, sprejemljivostjo in vestnostjo, niso bile ugotovljene nobene signifikantne povezave. Posamezne osebnostne dimenzije so se povezovale s posameznimi poddimenzijami tveganega vedenja.
Keywords:tvegano vedenje, osebnostne lastnosti, religioznost
Year of publishing:2019
Publisher:[M. Brdnik]
Source:Maribor
UDC:159.923(043.2)
COBISS_ID:24432648 Link is opened in a new window
License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
This work is available under this license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International
Views:78
Downloads:22
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FF
:
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Big five personality traits and risk-taking behaviour
Abstract:The purpose of this Master’s thesis was to check the connections between the Big Five personality traits, selected forms of risk-taking behavior and perception of risk-taking behavior. In addition to the correlations of previously mentioned constructs, there were also established connections with sex, age and religion. The sample was composed of 187 participants. For the check of connections the following questionnaires were used: the BFI questionnaire (John, Donahue and Kentle, 1991) for the Big Five personality traits; the DOSPERT Scale (Blais in Weber, 2006) for the selected forms and perceptions of risk-taking behavior; the AUDIT-C questionnaire for checking of risky alcohol consumption; and my own questionnaire for checking of religiosity, smoking and use if illegal substances. The study disclosed differences in perception or risk-taking behavior and participation in risk-taking behavior based on sex; women perceived actions as riskier, while men were more prone to participate in different forms of risk-taking behavior. Both sexes with age perceive more risks and are less willing to participate in risk-taking behavior. Differences between religious and non-religious persons were also disclosed. Religious persons are less willing to take risks. A significant prevalence of risky alcohol consumption has also been observed (present in 46.5% of the total sample). Despite attempts, on the sample based on personality traits, it was not possible to carry out a predictive value for risk-taking behavior. In addition the study disclosed positive correlations between openness, extraversion and common risk-taking behavior, while between overall risk-taking behavior, neuroticism, acceptability and conscientiousness no correlations were disclosed. Individual personality traits correlated with individual sub traits of risk-taking behavior.
Keywords:risk-taking behaviour, personality traits, religiosity


Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica