| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Ustavni pomen tržne zakonodaje EU
Authors:ID Hojnik, Janja (Author)
ID Univerza v Mariboru (Copyright holder)
Files:.pdf LeXonomica_2014_Hojnik_Ustavni_pomen_trzne_zakonodaje_EU.pdf (385,41 KB)
MD5: 9CF026E7C7FB987EEE364B642BCD6F07
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/2264055a-ff05-4d67-9d33-3b38e217f6ad
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Na tržnem področju, ki velja za temelj evropske integracije, države članice že zelo težko ohranjajo status subjekta, ki je pristojen sprejemati ekonomsko- politične odločitve, in tako vse bolj izgubljajo svojo vlogo pri urejanju tržnih vprašanj. Avtorica izpostavlja, da je razmejevanje med negativno in pozitivno integracijo ter njuna preslikava na decentralistični oz. centralistični pristop k notranjemu trgu zgolj načelne teoretične narave. Kot to potrjuje sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lahko namreč tudi na temelju negativne integracije države članice izgubijo obsežen obseg avtonomije. Po drugi strani pa harmonizacija kot protagonist pozitivne integracije nujno ne izključuje pristojnosti držav članic na področju trga. Avtorica ugotavlja, da je trg EU vse bolj intenzivno urejen s strani centralnih oblasti. Vendar pa pri tem ne gre za preprosto reregulacijo – prenos urejanja z nacionalne ravni na raven EU, ampak gre za zmes državnega in unijskega urejanja. Sodobne tehnike urejanja, katerih cilj je kombinirati prednosti centralizacije z ohranjanjem lokalne avtonomije – minimalna harmonizacija, nov pristop in odprta metoda usklajevanja – predstavljajo mešanico centraliziranega in decentraliziranega urejanja trga, pri čemer vključujejo široko skupino akterjev, tako iz javnega kot tudi zasebnega sektorja.
Keywords:notranji trg EU, centralizacija, decentralizacija, negativna integracija, pozitivna integracija, harmonizacija
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2014
Number of pages:str. 29-48
Numbering:Letn. 6, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-71300 New window
ISSN:1855-7147
UDC:339.13:061.1EU+342.4
ISSN on article:1855-7147
COBISS.SI-ID:4747819 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:YVXM8A0X
Copyright:Univerza v Mariboru
Publication date in DKUM:02.08.2018
Views:917
Downloads:83
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Lexonomica : revija za pravo in ekonomijo
Publisher:Pravna fakulteta, Pravna fakulteta, University of Maribor Press
ISSN:1855-7147
COBISS.SI-ID:246384128 New window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Constitutional meaning of EU market legislation
Abstract:In the market field that is often perceived as the fundament of the European Integration Member States are hardly retaining competences to adopt economic-political decisions, thereby increasingly losing their role in the regulation of market issues. The author emphasises that the distinction between negative and positive integration and its mapping to de-centralist and centralistic approach to the internal market is of pure theoretical nature. As confirmed by the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU also, negative integration may lead to a considerable loss of Member States' autonomy. On the other hand, however, harmonisation as the protagonist of positive integration does not necessarily exclude Member States' competences in the market field. The author concludes that the EU internal market is increasingly regulated by the central authorities. This does not, however, mean simple reregulation – transfer of powers from the national to the Union level, but is rather a mixture of national and Union regulation. Modern regulatory techniques that tend to combine advantages of centralisation with preservation of local autonomy – minimum harmonisation, new approach, open method of coordination – present a mixture of centralist and de- centralist market regulation, thereby including a large number of actors, from the public and well as private sector.
Keywords:EU internal market, centralisation, decentralisation, negative integration, positive integration, harmonisation


Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. LeXonomica

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica