| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Neoliberal metaphor as a quasi-economic paradigm in function of vulgarized institutional monism and an experiment of interest
Authors:ID Drašković, Veselin (Author)
Files:.pdf 2014_Draskovic_Neoliberal_metaphor_as_a_quasi-economic_paradigm_in_function_of_vulgarized_institutional_monism_and_an_experiment.pdf (921,75 KB)
MD5: E87E5CF0A29E164C8A5FB9117BDAD70F
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/ffc469b1-8fd8-40a2-9df9-7f59d16f4329
 
URL http://sphub.org/books/neoliberal-metaphor-as-a-quasi-economic-paradigm-in-function-of-vulgarized-institutional-monism-and-an-experiment-of-interest/
 
Language:English
Work type:Scientific work
Typology:2.01 - Scientific Monograph
Organization:FL - Faculty of Logistic
Abstract:We live in a time that according neoliberalism (as an ideology, doctrine, philosophy, theory and metaphor) in global and local boundaries manifests itself as an immoral, inhumane, brutal, chaotic, crisis and hegemonic system (order) of power, governance, violence, exploitation and greed. This is the time when everything is relativized, thanks to neoliberalism, paradoxically and ironically, due to interests and rhetorical absolutism of freedom and market. The reason for writing this manuscript is not just analysis, explanation and critique of neoliberalism and its forms, but also the cause of its evolution towards vulgarized quasi-neoliberal model. The aim of this manuscript is to point out: - neoliberal causes of the permanent and crisis transition, which caused major problems and deformities, and created a new dogma with uncertain lifetime, - inadequate civilizational environment, etatistic tradition and the creation of a quasi-institutional conditions that have enabled the introduction of new elitist (to a certain extent and sense of totalitarian) system under the mask of neoliberalism, - the fact that forcing of quasi-neoliberalism is a privilege of unreasonable and/or highly interest oriented “reformists”, because delaying changes means delaying development, - the difference between rhetoric and practice, ie. between the story of liberal democracy (which promotes the rights of individuals, human and social freedoms and human rights, as opposed to collectivism, totalitarianism and authoritarian policies) and quasi-neoliberal economic policies (global and transitional), that were dominant worldwide and paradoxically violates all liberal principles, and e) the use of state as a screen for expressing expansive nomenclature interests and non-market appropriation of its significant resources. The aim is to point to the existence and functioning of the vicious circle of crisis (global and transitional), created by the following relation: theoretical neoliberalism as an institutional monism – its vulgarization, dogmatisation and subjectivity in practice – through manifestation of freedom of operation and connectivity of supranational and national elites – tycoonisation and the criminalization of the economy and society – reproduction of the crisis. This article is not written to point out the culprits or their recognition, but only the phenomenological and ontological critique of quasi-institutional monism and advocating the institutional pluralism, which I believe is civilizational and development imperative. For the purpose of warning, this manuscript suggests a critical review and consideration of ending (eliminating) the abuse of neoliberal theoretical concepts into practical interest purposes, ending a deadly, sophisticated and dogmatic neoliberal metaphor for numerous national and state troubles and anti-developmental contradictions. I came to the conclusion that neoliberalism is merely a metaphor that conceptually generates a conglomerated complex and contradictory context, which has its own doctrinal, terminological, institutional, developmental, cognitive, strategic, interest, redistributive, ownership, civilizational, geopolitical and ideological meaning and numerous practical quasi-manifestations.
Keywords:neoliberalism, quasi-neoliberal model, crisis, quasi-institutional monism, institutional pluralism, economic theory
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of performance:Celje [etc.]
Publisher:SPH - Scientific Publishing Hub, Fakulteta za logistiko Univerze v Mariboru
Year of publishing:2014
Number of pages:128 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-70372 New window
ISBN:978-961-6948-03-6
UDC:330.831.8
COBISS.SI-ID:276030208 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:COCKGJAE
Publication date in DKUM:08.05.2018
Views:1134
Downloads:99
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:Misc.
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:08.05.2018

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:neoliberalizem, neoliberalni model, kriza, institucionalni monizem, institucionalni pluralizem, ekonomske teorije


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica