| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Kritična presoja uporabe hipnoze in kognitivnega intervjuja v preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj : diplomsko delo
Authors:ID Zorčič, Monika (Author)
ID Areh, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Zorcic_Monika_2017.pdf (746,24 KB)
MD5: 145D1442B4DE57F0A8834D4F29B76362
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/fb873076-f0e1-4282-a62c-1982a165b338
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:V diplomski nalogi Kritična presoja uporabe hipnoze in kognitivnega intervjuja v preiskovanju kaznivih dejanj bom odprla vprašanje spornosti teh dveh preiskovalnih metod. V začetku naloge sem predstavila dva ključna elementa za boljše razumevanje vsebine, to sta spomin in sugestija. Oba sta tesno povezana z vsako od metod zaslišanja, ki sta glavna tema naloge in ju opisujem v nadaljevanju. Sledijo krajši zapis o zgodovinskem ozadju, opis postopka zaslišanja z eno in drugo tehniko ter predstavitev prednosti in slabosti obeh metod. Ob koncu teoretičnega dela pa pridejo na vrsto praktični primeri uporabe obeh metod zaslišanja, njuna primerjava in kritični pogled na eno in drugo tehniko. Spornost metod izhaja iz predpostavke, da je pričanje posameznika kot končni rezultat njihove uporabe lahko netočno, česar si pravosodni organi pri preiskovanju kaznivega dejanja ne smejo privoščiti. V kritični primerjavi sem z uporabo literature, ki tematiko obravnava z različnih zornih kotov, izoblikovala končne ugotovitve. Hipnoza ne spada med tehnike zaslišanja, pri katerih rezultati nastopajo kot pravni dokazi, saj so preveč nepredvidljivi. Lahko jo uporabljamo le kot pomoč za iskanje dokazov oziroma izboljšanje spomina. Nasprotno pa je kognitivni intervju kljub pomanjkljivostim, ki so v primerjavi s hipnozo drastično manjše, priznana metoda, ki se uporablja pri zaslišanju oseb, povezanih s kaznivim dejanjem.
Keywords:kazniva dejanja, preiskovanje, kognitivni intervjuju, hipnoza, forenzična psihologija, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Place of performance:Ljubljana
Publisher:[M. Zorčič]
Year of publishing:2017
Year of performance:2017
Number of pages:V, 39 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-67596 New window
UDC:[159.9:340.6]+343.98(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3470314 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:IWRC4YDP
Publication date in DKUM:15.11.2017
Views:1256
Downloads:206
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:A critical assessment of hypnosis and cognitive interview in criminal investigations
Abstract:In my thesis, called „A critical assessment of hypnosis and cognitive interview in criminal investigations“, I am going to open the question the two methods' controversy. In the beginning I presented two key elements for better understanding of the topic - memory and suggestion. Both elements are closely connected to each of the interrogation methods. The thesis continues with a general description of both methods. It is followed by a shorter paragraph of historical background, the process of interrogation with one and the other method, and its advantages and disadvantages. At the end of the theoretical part I presented practical examples of each method's use, their comparison, and a critical of overview of both. The controversy of hypnosis and cognitive interview stems from the assumption that an individual's testimony as the final result of these two methods might be inaccurate, which is not something judicial authorities can afford. Through critical comparison of literature sources from different view angles, I have come to my conclusions. Hypnosis should not be considered an interrogation technique with legal proof as result, since its findings are too unpredictable. It can only be used as an aid to finding evidence, or to help improve memory. Cognitive interview, however, despite its results being drastically vaguer, is an acquired method used for interrogating persons involved in a criminal offense.
Keywords:Hypnosis, cognitive interview, psychology, interrogation, memory.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica