| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document

Title:Razmejitev med rednim pravdnim postopkom in postopkom v gospodarskih sporih
Authors:Zgaga, Iris (Author)
Ivanc, Tjaša (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Zgaga_Iris_2017.pdf (927,84 KB)
MD5: 9B6BB1BBBAF23B01C907E7B9B36021B4
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V diplomskem delu sem se podrobneje seznanila ter raziskala razmejitev med rednim pravdnim postopkom in postopkom v gospodarskih sporih. V prvem delu diplomskega dela sem se osredotočila na redni pravdni postopek, kjer sem opredelila zgolj splošne značilnosti. Pravdni postopek je sestavljen iz vrste procesnih dejanj procesnih subjektov, ki imajo za končni cilj odločanje o utemeljenosti tožbenega zahtevka ter kasnejšo izdajo sodne odločbe. V naslednjem poglavju so prikazane značilnosti postopka v gospodarskih sporih, kot so splošna pravila in načela posebnih postopkov pravdnega postopka, kamor sodi tudi postopek v gospodarskih sporih. Kasneje je obravnavan pojem gospodarskega spora, ki ga opredeljujejo subjektivna in objektivna merila oziroma kombinacija enih ali drugih. Delo vsebuje tudi pojem gospodarskih sporov majhne vrednosti, kjer predmet tožbenega zahtevka ne presega 4000 EUR. Težišče diplomskega dela je v razmejitvi med rednim pravdnim postopkom in postopkom v gospodarskih sporih. Razmejitev je posledica funkcionalne delitve dela znotraj sodišč in je nadvse pomembna, saj lahko napačno vodenje postopka povzroči nedovoljeno pravdno sredstvo, ki ga stranka v postopku ne more uveljavljati. Napačna uporaba pravil postopka sicer ni usodna, temveč pomeni zgolj relativno kršitev določb pravdnega postopka. Postopek v gospodarskih sporih se od rednega pravdnega postopka razlikuje v pristojnosti in sestavi sodišča. V postopku v gospodarskih sporih odloča sodnik posameznik na okrožnem sodišču. Razmejitev se prav tako kaže pri glavni obravnavi ter pripravi nanjo, v poravnavi, objektivni kumulaciji, sankcijah izostanka iz narokov, izrednih pravnih sredstvih in v pogostejšem alternativnem reševanju sporov v gospodarskih sporih. Vzporedno sem poudarila pomembne podobnosti oziroma razlike v ureditvi gospodarskih sporov Nemčije in Hrvaške.
Keywords:pravdni postopek, civilna zadeva, gospodarski spor, razmejitev, gospodarski spor majhne vrednosti, gospodarski posli in gospodarske pogodbe, pristojnost in sestava sodišča, glavna obravnava, poskus poravnave, procesni roki, izredna pravna sredstva, revizija, objektivna kumulacija, alternativno reševanje sporov
Year of publishing:2017
Publisher:[I. Zgaga]
Source:Maribor
UDC:347.951.2(043.2)
COBISS_ID:5435691 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:K3AP6D7F
Views:1321
Downloads:231
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:20.07.2017

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Delimitation between civil law procedure and proceedings in commercial disputes
Abstract:In this thesis I have explored the delimitation between civil law procedure and proceedings in commercial disputes. The first part focuses on civil procedure by identifying its general characteristics. Judicial procedure consists of a series of procedural acts by subjects who have the ultimate objective of ruling on the merits of a claim and subsequently issuing a decision. The next section presents the characteristics of proceedings in commercial disputes, such as specific rules and legal principles. Next, I discuss the concept of commercial conflict, which is defined by subjective and objective criteria or a combination of one or the other. The thesis also includes the concept of commercial small claims, where the subject of the claim does not exceed €4000. The focal point of the thesis is the delimitation between civil procedure and proceedings in commercial disputes. Delimitation is important because an incorrect proceeding may lead to illegal remedies which cannot be claimed by any party. However, the misapplication of rules in the procedure is not “fatal” but only a relative violation of the civil procedure. The differences between these two procedures can also be found in the jurisdiction and composition of the court, main hearings, settlements, objective cumulation, sanctions of absence from the hearing, legal remedies and increased alternative dispute resolution in commercial disputes. I have also explored the similarities and differences in the legislation of commercial disputes in Germany and Croatia.
Keywords:litigation, civil case, commercial dispute, delimitation, commercial small claims, commercial transactions and contracts, jurisdiction and composition of the court, main hearings, settlement, procedural time limits, extraordinary legal remedies, objective cumulation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR


Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica