| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document

Title:OSEBE, UPRAVIČENE ZA UVELJAVLJANJE KRŠITEV V POSTOPKIH JAVNEGA NAROČANJA
Authors:Mlakar Sukič, Nataša (Author)
Kranjc, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Mlakar_Sukic_Natasa_2016.pdf (2,05 MB)
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis (m2)
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V magistrski nalogi smo se ukvarjali z vprašanjem, kdo lahko uveljavlja pravne zahtevke zaradi kršitev pravil o javnem naročanju. Ker se lahko uveljavljajo tri vrste zahtevkov, in sicer zahtevek za revizijo, zahtevek za ničnost pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila in odškodninski zahtevek, smo predstavili vsakega posebej, glede na ureditev v pravilih Evropske unije in našo nacionalno ureditev. Za uveljavljanje vsakega izmed teh zahtevkov so določeni posebni pogoji. Pogoji za uveljavljanje zahtevka za revizijo so določeni v Zakonu o pravnem varstvu v postopkih javnega naročanja. Zastavlja se predvsem vprašanje v zvezi z obravnavo aktivne legitimacije, in sicer ali vsakomur omogočiti vložitev zahtevka za revizijo pred Državno revizijsko komisijo za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil, ali ga omejiti. Ali naj bo aktivna legitimacija permisivne ali restriktivne narave, je odvisno tudi od tega, v čigavem interesu je predpisano posebno pravno varstvo, ali v javnem interesu ali v interesu prizadetih ponudnikov. Sodišče Evropske unije zastopa stališče, da naj pogoji za priznanje aktivne legitimacije ne bodo preveč omejevalni, pri nas pa sta šli zakonodaja in praksa drugo pot. Pojasnili bomo, da je pretirano omejevanje pogojev za priznanje aktivne legitimacije, ki je zgolj procesna predpostavka za začetek revizijskega postopka, v nasprotju z načelom dostopnosti in načelom učinkovitosti, kar je v nasprotju s cilji javnega naročanja in s pravom Evropske unije. Prav tako menimo, da nacionalna zakonska ureditev, ki ima podobne pravne učinke, ni smiselna. Tudi pri uveljavljanju ničnosti pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila in pri uveljavljanju odškodninske sankcije zaradi kršitev pravil o javnem naročanju so določeni posebni pogoji. Obstajajo tudi druge številne posebnosti in omejitve pravnega varstva s tega področja, ki jih bomo izpostavili in predstavili.
Keywords:javna naročila, pravno varstvo v postopkih javnega naročanja, zahtevek za revizijo, aktivna legitimacija, interes za dodelitev javnega naročila, škoda, neobstoj aktivne legitimacije, neveljavnost, odškodnina, kršitev prava EU.
Year of publishing:2016
Publisher:[N. Mlakar Sukič]
Source:Maribor
UDC:347.451.8
COBISS_ID:5209131 Link is opened in a new window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:UI8AQLUD
Views:1101
Downloads:99
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Persons, entitled to claim violations in the public procurement procedures
Abstract:In this master thesis we dealt with the question who has the right to exercise certain claims for violation of the public procurement rules. As there can be enforced three types of claims, namely review claim, claim for nullification of the contract or individual contract and damage claim, we presented each of them, according to the European Union regulation and our national regulation. For each of these three claims rules define specific conditions. Conditions for the exercise of a review claim are set out in the Legal protection in public procurement procedures act. This poses a question especially with regard to Locus Standi, or allow anyone to review claim before the National Review Commission for Reviewing Public Procurement Award Procedures, or limit him. Should there be capacity to initiate proceeding permissive or restrictive in nature also depends in whose interest is provided a special legal protection, or in the public interest or in the interest of the affected tenderers. The Court of Justice of the European Union took the stance that the conditions for the recognition of Locus Standi shall not be too restrictive, but Slovenian legislation and practice are going another way. We explained that too much restrictive conditions for the existence of Locus Standi, which is merely a procedural presumption for the start of the review procedure, contrary to the Principle of Accessibility and the Principle of Efficiency, which is contrary to the objectives of public procurement and to the European Union law. Also law regulation with a similar legal effects doesn’t make any sense. Even in the exercise of nullification of the contract or individual contract to award a contract and the enforcement of sanctions for damages for breach of public procurement rules designate specific conditions. There are also a number of specific peculiarity and restrictions, we will set out and present.
Keywords:Public procurement, Legal protection in Public Procurement Procedures, Review claim, Locus Standi, Interest in being awarded a public contract, Damage, Lack of Locus Standi, Invalidity, Damages, sufficiently breach of European Union law.


Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica