| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font
First page > Show document

Show document Help

Title:NAČELA V POSTOPKU V SPORU MAJHNE VREDNOSTI PO ZPP IN PRIMERJAVA Z EVROPSKIM POSTOPKOM V SPORU MAJHNE VREDNOSTI
Authors:ID Zakrajšek, Iris (Author)
ID Ivanc, Tjaša (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Zakrajsek_Iris_2016.pdf (1,42 MB)
MD5: CF913BA7B8EEC884098061178BADB723
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Magistrsko delo je osredotočeno na načela v postopku v sporu majhne vrednosti, ki je na ravni našega nacionalnega prava urejen z Zakonom o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) ter na evropski ravni z Uredbo (ES) št. 861/2007. Proti koncu magistrskega dela sledi primerjava obeh postopkov. Navedeni postopek je poseben zaradi nizke vrednosti zahtevka, ki znaša 2.000 evrov in ravno zaradi tega se načela pri tem posebnem postopku razlikujejo od načel rednega postopka. Ne glede na prirejenost načel in poenostavljenost postopka v sporu majhne vrednosti pa ni zmanjšana kakovost pravdnega varstva. Poleg notranjih sporov pa večkrat pride tudi do čezmejnih sporov, kajti vse več ljudi se poslužuje spletnih nakupov, s čimer se veča število čezmejnih sporov. Zaradi lažjega dostopa do sodnega varstva je bila na ravni Evropske unije sprejeta Uredba (ES) št. 861/2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, ki poenostavlja in pospešuje čezmejne spore majhne vrednosti. Skozi čas pa se je pokazalo, da uredba ni zadostila ciljem, kar je tudi razvidno v nadaljevanju magistrskega dela. Zaradi tega je Komisija sprejela Predlog o spremembi Uredbe 861/2007, v kateri je bilo nekaj predlogov, ki niso obrodili sadov in predlogi, ki so dobili podporo s strani Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta. Slednja sta sprejela Uredbo 2015/2421 o spremembi Uredbe 861/2007, ki naj bi s številnimi popravki, med njimi najbolj pomembnim glede višine vrednosti zahtevka, povečala število zahtev v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti in omogočila bolj učinkovit postopek. Spremembe so podrobneje predstavljene v nadaljevanju magistrskega dela.
Keywords:nacionalni postopek v sporu majhne vrednosti, evropski postopek v sporu majhne vrednosti, načelo ekonomičnosti in pospešitve postopka, načelo pisnosti, načelo materialne resnice, načelo obojestranskega zaslišanja, načelo sorazmernosti, načelo pomoči prava nevešči stranki, primerjalno pravo.
Place of publishing:Sevnica
Publisher:[I. Zakrajšek]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-60386 New window
UDC:347.9(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5120043 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:IB1QTDNY
Publication date in DKUM:29.06.2016
Views:1788
Downloads:295
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:PRINCIPLES OF THE SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE BY CPA AND COMPARISON WITH EUROPIAN SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE
Abstract:The master’s thesis is focused on the principles of the small claims procedure, which is at the level of our national law, regulated by Civil Procedure Act (hereinafter CPA) as well as at the European level regulated by Regulation no. 861/2007. Towards the end of the thesis follows the comparison of the two procedures. This procedure is special because of the low value of the claim, amounting 2.000 euros and this is exactly why the principles in this specific procedure differ from the principles of ordinary procedure. Regardless to adjusting the principles and simplicity of the procedure in small claims, it is not reduced the quality of legal protection. In addition to the internal litigations, there are also many cross-border litigations, because more and more people use online purchases what increases the number of cross-border litigations. In order to enhance access to justice, was the European Union adopted Regulation no. 861/2007 establishing a european small claims procedure, which simplifies and speeds up the cross-border small claims procedures. Over time, however, it became clear that the regulation was not sufficient, which is also shown below the thesis. For this reason, the Commission adopted a Proposal amending Regulation no. 861/2007, in which there were some proposals, that have not been fulfilled and proposals that have been supported by the European Parliament and Council. The latter adopted Regulation no. 2015/2421 that amending Regulation no. 861/2007, which should, with many corrections, among them the most important about the value of the claim, increases the number of claims in the european small claims procedure and allows more efficient process. The changes are presented in more detail in the following of thesis.
Keywords:national small claims procedure, european small claims procedure, the principle of procedural economy and expedition of proceedings, the written form principle, the substantive truth principle, hearing both partiesprinciple, the principle of proportionality, the legal assistance principle, comparative law.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica