| | SLO | ENG | Piškotki in zasebnost

Večja pisava | Manjša pisava

Izpis gradiva Pomoč

Naslov:Primerjava presejalnih orodij za oceno stanja prehranjenosti pri hospitaliziranih bolnikih v kliniki Golnik
Avtorji:ID Kosten, Tatjana (Avtor)
ID Balantič, Zvonko (Mentor) Več o mentorju... Novo okno
ID Lainščak, Mitja (Komentor)
Datoteke:.pdf MAG_Kosten_Tatjana_2016.pdf (2,60 MB)
MD5: BC7A3FA7903F920BE5F6F345745A9D1B
 
Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Vrsta gradiva:Magistrsko delo/naloga
Organizacija:FOV - Fakulteta za organizacijske vede
Opis:Izhodišča Podhranjenost je velik problem bolnikov v bolnišnicah. Identificiramo jo lahko s prehranskim presejanjem. Bolniki s podhranjenostjo imajo daljšo ležalno dobo, slabši izid zdravljenja in slabšo prognozo, zato je pomembno, da podhranjenost prepoznamo in jo poskušamo obravnavati. Namen V raziskavi smo želeli preveriti, ali so vsa orodja za oceno prehranjenosti enaka in ali obstaja povezava med rezultati, pridobljenimi z orodji in izmerjeno telesno sestavo. Raziskovalna metodologija V prospektivno raziskavo, kjer smo primerjali šest presejalnih orodij za oceno prehranjenosti bolnikov, smo vključili 336 bolnikov. Oceno prehranjenosti smo opravili s šestimi orodji za oceno prehranjenosti: MNA - Mini Nutritional Assessment, NRS 2002 - Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, MUST- Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, NRI - Nutritional Risk Index, SGA - Subjective Global Assessment in GNRI - Geriatric Nutritional Risk Factor. Opravili smo antropometrične meritve, merjenje telesne sestave z bioelektrično impedanco in pridobili rezultate ostalih preiskav. Iz medicinske dokumentacije smo povzeli podatke o demografskih značilnostih in sočasnih obolenjih. Podatke smo analizirali s programom SPSS 19.0 (SPSS INC, 2010, USA) in Excell 2010. Numerične spremenljivke smo predstavili s srednjo vrednostjo in standardnim odklonom, kategorične spremenljivke pa smo predstavili z absolutnim številom in odstotkom. Razlike med spremenljivkami smo analizirali s Student´s t testom, Mann Whitneyjevim U-testom in hi-kvadrat testom. Morebitne povezave med spremenljivkami smo ocenjevali z metodo korelacije in izračunali koeficient kapa. Rezultati Povprečna starost vključenih bolnikov je bila 67,42 ± 13,68 let, 52,4 % je bilo moških. Podhranjenih glede na orodja MNA, NRS 2002, MUST, SGA, NRI, GNRI je bilo 8,6 %, 9,5 %, 15,5 %, 8,3 %, 25,5 %, 3,6 % vključenih bolnikov. Tveganje za podhranjenost smo opazili pri 34,5 %, 0%, 12,2 %, 43,2 %, 6,7 % in 6,2 % bolnikov. Pri vseh orodjih so imeli dobro prehranjeni bolniki značilno boljše 6-mesečno preživetje od podhranjenih bolnikov. (p < 0,001 za vse). Bolniki s podhranjenostjo ocenjeni z MNA, NRS 2002 in NRI so imeli statistično značilno daljšo ležalno dobo od dobro prehranjenih bolnikov (p < 0,05). Dobro prehranjeni bolniki so imeli značilno višji FFMI od bolnikov s podhranjenostjo. Zaključki Ugotovili smo, da z različnimi orodji za prehransko presejanje identificiramo različne odstotke podhranjenih bolnikov. Pri vprašalnikih MNA, NRI, SGA, MUST in NRS 2002 imajo podhranjeni bolniki slabše preživetje od bolnikov s tveganjem za podhranjenost in od dobro prehranjenih bolnikov. Pri vseh orodjih imajo podhranjeni bolniki daljšo ležalno dobo in nižji FFMI kot dobro prehranjeni bolniki.
Ključne besede:prehranjenost, orodja za oceno prehranjenosti, pusta mišična masa, prehranska ocena, indeks puste telesne mase
Kraj izida:Maribor
Leto izida:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-59125 Novo okno
COBISS.SI-ID:7601171 Novo okno
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:EXZS7LAY
Datum objave v DKUM:03.06.2016
Število ogledov:2792
Število prenosov:341
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Področja:FOV
:
Kopiraj citat
  
Skupna ocena:(0 glasov)
Vaša ocena:Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom.
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share


Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše podrobnosti ali sproži prenos.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Naslov:Comparison of nutritional status screening tools in Clinik Golnik hospitalized patients
Opis:Background Malnutrition is a major problem of hospitalized patients. We identify them with nutritional screening tools. Patients with malnutrition have a longer hospital stay, a worse clinical outcome, more complications and it is therefore important to identify malnutrition and try to treat it. Aim The aim of the study was to compare six tools for the assessment of the nutritional status by means of body composition measurements. We wanted to determine which tool is the most appropriate for patients at the University Clinic Golnik. Methods The prospective study, in which we compared six screening tools used to assess the nutritional status of patients, included 336 patients. We used six tools for the assessment of the nutritional status: MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment), NRS 2002 (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002), MUST (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool), NRI (Nutritional Risk Index) and SGA (Subjective Global Assessment) and GNRI (Geriatric Nutritional Risk Factor). We performed antropometric measurements, measured the body composition by bioelectric impedance and obtained the results of other examinations. We obtained data on demographic characteristics and contemporary diseases from medical records. Data was analyzed with the SPSS 19.0 (SPSS INC 2010, USA) and Excel 2010. Numerical variables were presented with the mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables were presented with the absolute number and percentage. Differences between the variables were analyzed with the Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test. We evaluated potential links between the variables with correlation method, and we calculated the kappa coefficient. Results The average age of participating patients was 67.42 ± 13.68 years, 52.4% were male. We identified malnourished patients with MNA, NRS 2002, MUST, SGA, NRI, GNRI in 8.6 %, 9.5 %, 15.5 %, 8.3 %, 25.5 %, 3.6 % of patients, respectively. The risk of malnutrition was detected in 34.5 %, 0 %, 12.2 %, 43.2 %, 6.7 % and 6.2 % of patients, respectively. Well- nourished patients had a significantly better 6-month survival compared to malnourished patients (p < 0.001 for all) according to all tools. Malnourished patients assessed with MNA, NRS 2002, NRI had a significantly longer length of hospital stay than well-nourished patients (p < 0.05). Well-nourished patients had a significantly higher FFMI compared to patients with malnutrition. Conclusions We have discovered that a variety of tools for nutritional screening identifies different percentages of malnourished patients. In the MNA, NRI, SGA, MUST and NRS 2002 questionnaires malnourished patients have a worse survival rate compared to patients at risk of malnutrition and compared to well-nourished patients. Malnourished patients have a longer length of hospital stay and lower FFMI than well-nourished patients according to all tools.
Ključne besede:nutrition, screening tools for nutritional status, fat-free mass, nutritional assessment, fat-free mass index


Komentarji

Dodaj komentar

Za komentiranje se morate prijaviti.

Komentarji (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
Ni komentarjev!

Nazaj
Logotipi partnerjev Univerza v Mariboru Univerza v Ljubljani Univerza na Primorskem Univerza v Novi Gorici