| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Upravni spor v davčnih zadevah
Authors:ID Faganel, Marjanca (Author)
ID Škof, Bojan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Faganel_Marjanca_i2016.pdf (787,68 KB)
MD5: 05ACCA384AC63E87FE85C1B9A049315A
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Način odločanju v upravnem sporu in organizacijo sodišč v davčnih zadevah v R Sloveniji ureja Zakon o upravnem sporu (kratica ZUS-1). Zakonska ureditev upravnega spora ni v ničemer prilagojena odločanju o davčnih zadevah, razen glede pristojnosti sodišč, katerih zgodovinski razvoj je na ozemlju R Slovenije sintetično predstavljen. Ne upošteva namreč specifičnih načel, kot so strožja zakonitost ob prepovedani arbitrarnosti, poudarjen pomen materialne resnice ter vsebini zadev prilagojeni način njenega ugotavljanja, davčna tajnost in dolžnost zavezanca za dajanje podatkov s poudarkom, da so ti resnični. Prikazan je zgodovinski razvoj upravnosodnega odločanja v davčnih zadevah na ozemlju R Slovenije. Po sintetični opredeliti kategorije davščin analiziramo postopek odločanja v davčnih zadevah; najprej pred davčnimi organi in nato podrobno pred sodiščem v t.i. upravnem sporu. Naloga, izhajajoč iz predstavitve davčnih načel, analitično preverja usklajenost zakona o upravnem sporu v odločanju o davčnih zadevah z Ustavo R Slovenije in s pravom Evropske unije. V iskanju pobud za izboljšanje zakonske ureditve pa na osnovi odgovorov na posebni vprašalnik in na osnovi literature prikazuje sodno varstvo v nekaterih državah zlasti Evropske unije, ki so zaradi pravnega sistema relevantne za Slovenijo, ali pa vsebujejo rešitve dilem, ki bi se lahko vključile tudi v slovensko ureditev. Sklepni ugotovitvi o zgolj delni neprilagojenosti upravnega spora odločanju o davčnih zadevah sledi konkretni predlog, v čem bi bilo potrebno predpise dopolniti, morda tudi z nekaterimi rešitvami iz tujih ureditev.
Keywords:upravni spor, davčna zadeva, davčna načela, sodno varstvo, organizacija sodišč, tožba v upravnem spor, odločanje v davčnih zadevah, pravila postopka, materialna resnica, sodba sodišča, pravna sradstva, revizija
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[M. Faganel]
Year of publishing:2016
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-58022 New window
UDC:336.22(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:5174571 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:9RPCQDKK
Publication date in DKUM:15.09.2016
Views:2273
Downloads:191
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Administrative Dispute on Taxation Matters
Abstract:Decision-making process in administrative dispute and organisation of courts in taxation matters is in the Republic of Slovenia defined by the Administrative Dispute Act (ZUS-1). However, the regulation of administrative dispute does not in any case adjust to decision making in taxation matters, except in the case of courts, whose historical development in the Republic of Slovenia is synthetically presented. Furthermore, it does not follow specific principles, such as stringent legality under forbidden arbitration, substantive truth and its determination according to the case subject matter, tax secret and the duty of the person liable to provide information, with the emphasis on its accuracy. The thesis presents historical development of judicial and administrative decision making in taxation matters in the Republic of Slovenia. Synthetic definition of tax categories is followed by the decision making in taxation matters analysis – both before tax authorities and, in more detail, before court, i.e. in administrative dispute. The thesis, based on the tax principles presentation, analytically studies the compliance of the Administrative Dispute Act on taxation matters with the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and the European Union Law. In pursue of proposals for legal regulation improvement and on the basis of the special questionnaire (see Attachment) and literature, the thesis presents judicial protection in some counties, especially EU member states which are relevant for Slovenia due to their legal system or offer answers to problems applicable also to Slovenian framework. The thesis comes to the conclusion that administrative dispute is not fully compatible with decision making in taxation matters and outlines a concrete proposal on the necessary amendments of rules and regulations, with some of proposed solutions adopted also form foreign countries.
Keywords:administrative dispute, taxation matters, taxation principles, judicial protection, organization of courts, action in an administrative dispute, decision making in taxation matters, rules of procedure, material truth, judgement of the court, legal means, revision


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica