| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document

Title:Varnostni ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja in varstva v zavodu in na prostosti : primerjava z Nemčijo
Authors:Ogrin, Klemen (Author)
Zgaga, Sabina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Ogrin_Klemen_2015.pdf (602,65 KB)
MD5: DBDCD471454BCF6A1A84D3F3EFBFA709
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Varnostni ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja in varstva v zavodu in na prostosti se izreče osebam, ki so bile v času storitve kaznivega dejanja v stanju neprištevnosti ali bistveno zmanjšane prištevnosti. Sodišče s pomočjo psihiatričnega izvedenca razsodi o neprištevnosti in bistveno zmanjšani prištevnosti. Ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja in varstva v zavodu lahko traja največ pet let. V Sloveniji se ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja in varstva v zavodu izvaja v Enoti za forenzično psihiatrijo, ki je tudi edina ustanova v Sloveniji primerna za izvajanje ukrepa obveznega psihiatričnega zdrsvljenja in vastva v zavodu. Ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja na prostosti lahko traja največ dve leti in se izvaja v psihiatričnih ambulantah. Sodišče pri obeh ukrepih obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja vsakih šest mesecev določi ali je potrebno nadaljnje zdravljenje in ali je zdravljenje uspešno. Pri ukrepu obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja se poraja tudi vprašanje o kršenju človekovih pravic, saj se pacienti ne zdravijo prostovljno. Preverjali smo tudi tri hipoteze, pri čemer smo hipotezo: Ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja na prostosti ni primeren, saj lahko oseba, kljub zdravljenju izvrši še kakšno hudo kaznivo dejanje, ovrgli. Hipotezo: V Nemčiji je ukrep obveznega psihiatričnega zdravljenja in varstva v zavodu in na prostosti bolj uspešen, saj vsakemu obsojencu sodišče določi nadzornika, ki mu pomaga in ga spodbuja tekom zdravljenja, smo potrdili, kar smo naredili tudi pri zadnji hipotezi: Psihiatrično zdravljenje ni vedno uspešno in učinkovito, saj so nekatere duševne bolezni trajne.
Keywords:kazensko pravo, varnostni ukrep, obvezno psihiatrično zdravljenje, neprištevnost, zmanjšana prištevnost, Enota za forenzično psihiatrijo, človekove pravice, diplomske naloge
Year of publishing:2015
Year of performance:2015
Place of performance:[Ljubljana
Publisher:K. Ogrin]
Number of pages:46 str.
Source:[Ljubljana
UDC:343.1(043.2)
COBISS_ID:3025642 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:CUXQSTLF
Views:1927
Downloads:305
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:COMPULSORY PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT AND CONFINEMENT IN A HEALTH INSTITUTION AND AT LIBERTY: COMPARISON WITH GERMANY
Abstract:Compulsory psychiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution and at liberty is for offenders who were in a state of diminished capacity or in a state of lacked capacity to be adjuged guilty, when they commited unlawful act. The court of justice make judgment about dimished capacity and lacked capacity, with help from psychiatry expert. Compulsory psyhiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution can last no more than five years. In Slovenia is compulsory psyhiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution executed in Unit for forensic psychiatry, which is also the only suitable institution for executing compulsory psychiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution. Compulsory psychiatric treatment and confinement at liberty can endure for two years maximum and is executed in psychiatric clinic. The court of justice in compulsory psychiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution and at liberty every six months determine if further treatment is necessary and if treatment is succesful. Human rights are critical factor in both cases, because it can be violated. We have also been checking three hypotheses in which case we disproved hypothesis: Compulsory psychiatric treatment at liberty is unsuitable, because convicted person can still commit unlawful act. We did pass hypothesis: Compulsory psychiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution and at liberty is in Germany more successful, because every pacient get parol officer who helps him and encourage him during psychiatric treatment. We did also pass hypothesis: Compulsory psychiatric treatment is not always successful and efective, because some mental disturbances can not be cured.
Keywords:Compulsory psyhiatric treatment and confinement in a health institution, compulsory psychiatric treatment and confinement at liberty, state of dimished capacity, state of lacked capacity, the court of justice, Enota za forenzično psihiatrijo, human rights.


Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica