| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:Policijska pooblastila v zakonski ureditvi in praksi : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija
Authors:ID Zidar, Nejc (Author)
ID Zgaga Markelj, Sabina (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UN_Zidar_Nejc_2015.pdf (694,40 KB)
MD5: 823C2165B983A362B982D1C6F5B1E359
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security
Abstract:Diplomska naloga govori o policijskih pooblastilih. Predstavili smo katera so temeljna načela za uporabo pooblastil ter podrobneje predstavili izbrana policijska pooblastila. Predstavili smo zakonodajo, ki ureja uporabo policijskih pooblastil, predvsem Zakon o nalogah in pooblastilih policije (2013), Zakon o kazenskem postopku (2014), Zakon o prekrških-1 (2011), Zakon o pravilih cestnega prometa (2013) in Zakon o nadzoru državne meje-2 (2010). Raziskali smo, katera so najpogosteje uporabljena policijska pooblastila med leti 2003 in 2014 ter kakšno je mnenje mladih glede policijskih postopkov in uporabe policijskih pooblastil. Postavili smo si prvo hipotezo - Število uporabljenih prisilnih sredstev od leta 2003 pada. Postavili smo še drugo in tretjo hipotezo in sicer, med izvajanjem kontrole prometa ima policist dovoljenje za pregled vozila in tretjo, uniformiran policist, se osebi zoper katero izvaja policijsko pooblastilo ni dolžan identificirati. Predstavili smo tudi dva primera iz prakse, kjer je šlo za prekoračitev policijskih pooblastil: Rehbock proti Sloveniji ter Matko proti Sloveniji. Pri obeh primerih gre za vložitev tožbe zoper kršitve človekovih pravic. Z raziskavo smo potrdili vse tri hipoteze. Ugotovili smo, da skupno število uporabljenih prisilnih sredstev policije med leti 2003 in 2014 pada. Z diplomsko nalogo smo torej potrdili tudi drugo hipotezo ter ugotovili, da ima policist med izvajanjem kontrole prometa dovoljenje za pregled vozila. Zadnjo hipotezo smo delno potrdili, saj smo ugotovili, da se mora uniformirani policist identificirati na zahtevo osebe, zoper katero izvaja policijsko pooblastilo. Uspeli smo potrditi tudi zadnjo hipotezo, torej to, da se uniformiran policist osebi, zoper katero izvaja policijsko pooblastilo ni dolžan identificirati. Z diplomsko nalogo smo dosegli cilj in namen, ki smo si ga postavili.
Keywords:policija, policijska pooblastila, pravna ureditev, človekove pravice, diplomske naloge
Place of publishing:[Ljubljana
Place of performance:[Ljubljana
Publisher:N. Zidar]
Year of publishing:2015
Year of performance:2015
Number of pages:54 str.
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-48594 New window
UDC:351.741(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:3034346 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:MXMDV4SB
Publication date in DKUM:22.10.2015
Views:3174
Downloads:529
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:FVV
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:POLICE POWERS IN LEGAL REGULATION AND PRACTICE
Abstract:The objective of the present thesis is police powers. Basic principles for the use of the powers are presented along with detailed presentation of selected police powers. We presented the legislation that regulates the use of police powers, especially the Police Tasks and Powers Act (2013), Criminal Procedure Act (2014), Minor Offences Act (2011), Road Traffic Safety Act (2013) and State Border Control Act (2010). We have explored which are the most commonly used police powers between 2003 and 2014, and what is the opinion of young people about police procedures and the use of police powers. We set the first hypothesis - the number of coercive measures since 2003 is falling. We formulated the second and third hypothesis – while performing traffic control the police officer has permission to inspect the vehicle and the third – a uniformed police officer is not obligated to identify himself to a person against whom the police powers are carried out. We also presented two practical examples where violation of police powers was involved: Rehbock against Slovenia and Matko against Slovenia. In both cases, filing a lawsuit against human rights violations was involved. The research confirmed all three hypotheses. We established that the total number of coercive measures of police between 2003 and 2014 is falling. The thesis also confirmed the second hypothesis with establishing that the police officer has permission to inspect the vehicle while performing traffic control. The third hypothesis was partially confirmed, as we established that the uniformed police officer needs to identify himself at the request of a person against whom police powers are carried out. We were able to confirm the last hypothesis, namely that the uniformed police officer is not obligated to identify himself to a person against whom the police powers are carried out. The thesis reached the objective and purpose that we have set.
Keywords:police powers, basic principles, coercive measures, Rehbock against Slovenia, Matko against Slovenia


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica