Kršitve temeljnih načel upravnega postopka - novejša judikatura

Jesenek, Majda

| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

First page > Show document

Show document

Title:	Kršitve temeljnih načel upravnega postopka - novejša judikatura
Authors:	ID Jesenek, Majda (Author) ID Grafenauer, Božo (Mentor) More about this mentor...
Files:	UNI_Jesenek_Majda_2012.pdf (366,08 KB) MD5: C24C68A3F01A1409EA134BD71B454249 PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/c64a90f5-17b4-4eb6-8e7a-432207a5373d
Language:	Slovenian
Work type:	Undergraduate thesis
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:	V diplomskem delu predstavljamo temeljna pravna in načela upravnega postopka, ki so kot vrednostna merila oziroma vodila vsebovana v konvencijah, ustavi in zakonih. Vsebinsko usmerjajo opredeljevanje pravnih pravil in njihovo izvrševanje, ki so se uveljavila v pravni praksi. S pregledom novejših (od leta 2009) pravnih praks oziroma judikatov Ustavnega, Upravnega in Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije na področju njihovih kršitev pa nazorno prikazati kako pomembna je njihova vloga. Temeljna načela upravnega postopka so hkrati pravila za razlago posameznih procesnih institutov splošnih in posebnih upravnih postopkov, jim pomagajo pri pravilni presoji, služijo za njihovo usmerjaje in nakazujejo način vodenja upravnih postopkov ter odločanja v konkretnih zadevah. Obravnavana načela upravnega postopka zato strankam pomenijo minimalne procesno-varstvene standarde in vsem državnim organom obvezna pravila ravnanja v upravnem postopku. Z njihovim poznavanjem je strankam zagotovljena možnost, da od pooblaščene osebe, ki upravni postopek vodi, zahtevajo dosledno spoštovanje le-teh, jim omogočajo sodelovanje v postopku ter uveljavljanje pravic in pravnih koristi. Upravni organi svoje delo opravljajo samostojno, v okviru in na podlagi veljavne zakonodaje. Posamični akti in dejanja državnih organov, organov lokalnih skupnosti in nosilcev javnih pooblastil, morajo zato vedno temeljiti na zakonu ali na zakonitem predpisu. V kolikor pride do kršitev, je vsakomur zagotovljena pravica do pritožbe oziroma drugega pravnega sredstva proti odločbam sodišč in drugih državnih organov, organov lokalnih skupnosti in nosilcev javnih pooblastil, s katerimi so ti odločali o pravicah ali pravnih interesih posameznikov. Upravni organi postopke vodijo in v njih odločajo samostojno, tudi v razmerju do organov drugih vej oblasti. Njihova odgovornost se pokaže v notranjih hierarhičnih razmerjih v okviru nadzorstvene pravice ter v vezanosti upravnih organov na odločitve sodišča. Pravni strokovnjaki ne opozarjajo zaman, da je potrebno sodbe Ustavnega sodišča spoštovati in jih izvajati. Njihovo nespoštovanje bi pomenilo kršitev temeljnih ustavnih načel pravne države z vgrajenim sistemom ravnovesij. V kolikor bi bilo odločanje prepuščeno zgolj javni upravi, bi vladavina prava zbledela ter bi prevlado prevzele vsakokratne politične struje. Zato je nujno, da nad delovanjem javne uprave bdi neodvisen strokoven organ kot je Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije.
Keywords:	temeljna načela upravnega postopka, načelo zakonitosti, načelo varstva pravic strank in javnih koristi, načelo materialne resnice, načelo zaslišanja strank, načelo proste presoje dokazov, načelo dolžnosti govoriti resnico, načelo samostojnosti pri odločanju, načelo pravice do pritožne, načelo ekonomičnosti postopka, sodna praksa
Place of publishing:	Maribor
Publisher:	[M. Jesenek]
Year of publishing:	2012
PID:	20.500.12556/DKUM-36853
UDC:	34(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:	4395051
NUK URN:	URN:SI:UM:DK:GCGDTN9D
Publication date in DKUM:	10.08.2012
Views:	5361
Downloads:	1217
Metadata:
Categories:	PF
:	Copy citation

Average score:	(0 votes)
Your score:	Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Violations of fundamental principles of administrative procedures - newer court decisions
Abstract:	The diploma thesis presents the basic principles of administrative law and proceedings, which are as value criteria and guidelines incorporated in Conventions, Constitution and laws. Their contents direct defining legal rules and their enforcement, which are implemented in legal practice. We try, with more recent review (since 2009) of legal practices of the Constitutional, the Administrative, and the Supreme Courts of the Republic of Slovenia, in matter of their violations, to clearly demonstrate importance of their roles. Basic principles of administrative proceedings are as well rules for the interpretation of procedural institutions in general and specific administrative proceedings, helping them for right assessments, serving them for guidance and indicating a way of managing procedures and decision making in individual cases. For clients means basic principles of administrative procedure, the minimum process-safety standards and mandatory rules of conduct in the proceedings for all state administration bodies. With knowledge of basic principles, clients have a possibility to require strict compliance from authorized person who leads an administrative procedure, allowing them to participate in the process and exercise their rights and legal benefits. The administrative authorities perform their work independently, within and under the applicable legislation. Individual acts and actions of state authorities, local communities and bearers of public authority should therefore always be based on law or legal act. In case violations occur, everyone is guaranteed the right to appeal or to have other legal remedy against the decisions of courts and other state bodies, local authorities and statutory authorities, on the rights or legal interests of individuals. The administrative authorities lead proceedings and decide independently, also in relation to other branches of government authorities. Their responsibility shows in the internal hierarchy within the supervisory rights and commitment of administrative bodies to the court decisions. Legal experts do not warn for nothing that is necessary to respect and implement judgments of the Constitutional Court. Disrespecting them would constitute a violation of fundamental constitutional principles of law and the built-in balance system. If only the public administration were left up to decide, the rule of law would fade away and the supremacy assumes respective political currents. Therefore it is essential for the functioning of public administration, to be supervised by an independent professional body such as the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia is.
Keywords:	the basic principles of administrative proceedings, the principle of legality, the principle of the protection of clients' rights and public benefit, the principle of material truth, the hearing rule principle, the principle of free assessment of evidence, the priciple of duty to speak the truth, the principle of autonomy, the principle of the right to appeal, the principle of procedural economy, jurisprudence.

Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)

0 - 0 / 0

There are no comments!

Back