| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:IZ KRIZE S PRISILNO PORAVNAVO NA PRIMERU GRADBENEGA PODJETJA V MARIBORU
Authors:ID Žižek, Katja (Author)
ID Oplotnik, Žan Jan (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf MAG_Zizek_Katja_2012.pdf (1,61 MB)
MD5: 83582792C2F5101B673923CBACDF40E6
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/2f529b77-4bc3-4be7-a8ea-5cb8ea21af65
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:EPF - Faculty of Business and Economics
Abstract:Različni avtorji različno opredeljujejo krizo podjetja. Če posplošimo, bi lahko rekli, da je kriza neugodno, nezaželeno in kritično stanje v podjetju, nastalo tako zaradi zunanjih kakor tudi notranjih vzrokov in neposredno ogroža njegov obstoj. Podjetja se vsakodnevno srečujejo s problemi, katerim se ni moč izogniti, vendar pa jih lahko napovemo ali vsaj nekatere med njimi. Vzroki, ki privedejo podjetje v krizo so torej notranji in/ali zunanji. Velikokrat sta za krizno situacijo kriva finančni management in poslovodstvo, ki nima dovolj dobrega nadzora nad računovodstvom in financami ali pa ima neprimeren stil vodenja podjetja. Na nastanek krize lahko prav tako vplivajo zunanji dejavniki, kot so npr. spremembe v panogi, splošna gospodarska kriza in posledično zmanjšanje investicij. Zato pa je zelo pomembno, da vodstvo podjetja spozna simptome in vzroke krize dovolj hitro oziroma pravočasno, da podjetje ne zaide v še hujše težave ali na koncu celo v stečaj. Poznamo različne vrste kriz in tudi avtorji jih različno opredeljujejo. Lahko jih opredelimo glede na plačilno sposobnost, glede na jakost krize, glede na njeno obvladljivost, glede na ogroženost podjetniških ciljev ipd.. Vsaka kriza se mora razviti v naslednjo fazo, kar pomeni, da pride do njene razrešitve ali do propada podjetja. Do razrešitve krize pa se lahko pride tudi s prisilno poravnavo. Prisilna poravnava je ukrep, s katerim se dolžniku omogoči trajno izboljšanje finančnega položaja in nemoteno nadaljevanje poslovanja. Torej z uvedbo postopka prisilne poravnave, katerega posledica je zmanjšanje oziroma odložitev plačila zapadlih obveznosti do upnikov, se ekonomsko-finančno stanje podjetja lahko tudi dolgoročno utrdi. Prisilna poravnava je sestavljena iz predhodnega in glavnega postopka. Začne se z njenim predlogom, postopek pa začne teči, ko je s strani sodišča izdan sklep o začetku postopka prisilne poravnave. Dolžnik mora h predlogu prav tako predloži načrt finančnega prestrukturiranja podjetja. Da se postopek prisilne poravnave lahko izpelje, se morajo z njim strinjati upniki. Najslabši možen scenarij za izhod iz krize je propad podjetja oziroma stečaj. Za stečaj se je potrebno odločiti takrat, ko druge oblike reševanja podjetja več ne pridejo v poštev. S stečajem dosežemo to, da neko podjetje, ki prinaša izgubo, čim prej ustavimo. Predlog za začetek stečajnega postopka lahko vloži dolžnik, upnik ali osebno odgovorni družbenik. Nahajamo se v obdobju recesije in finančne težave v podjetjih so skorajda neizbežne. Tudi gradbeno podjetje MTB, d.o.o. se je spopadlo s finančnimi težavami. Zaradi neuspešnega poslovanja, ki ima svoje izvore v skrajno neugodnih razmerah, v katerem deluje gradbeništvo, in ki ne zagotavlja več pozitivnega denarnega toka, so se v podjetju zelo hitro povečale obveznosti in sicer tako iz financiranja kakor tudi iz poslovanja. Vedno večje obveznosti, so začele povzročati vedno večjo plačilno nesposobnost in podjetje ni videlo druge možnosti, kot da je 31.3.2010 vložilo predlog za začetek postopka prisilne poravnave. Upniki so v mesecu dni po objavi oklica morali prijaviti svoje terjatve, dne 14.9.2010 pa so bili pozvani h glasovanju o prisilni poravnavi. 28.10.2010 je bila prisilna poravnava nad podjetjem MTB, d.o.o. sprejeta s 83,41 odstotki. Družba se je v nadaljnjem poslovanju v izredno težkih pogojih trudila, da bi poslovali likvidno, a ko so se poplačale obveznosti iz financiranja je nastajala izguba. Podjetje je izvajalo tudi nekatere ukrepe iz Načrta finančnega prestrukturiranja, a vse to ni bilo dovolj. Kasneje podjetje več ni imelo druge rešitve, kot da vloži predlog o začetku stečajnega postopka. Dne 21.3.2011 je sodišče izdalo sklep o stečaju podjetja MTB, d.o.o..
Keywords:Ključne besede: kriza, kriza podjetje, gradbeništvo, prisilna poravnava, stečaj, finančno prestrukturiranje, Zakon o finančnem prestrukturiranju, postopkih zaradi insolventnosti in prisilnem prenehanju,
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[K. Žižek]
Year of publishing:2012
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-21951 New window
UDC:005.5
COBISS.SI-ID:11076124 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:IIQZUXJF
Publication date in DKUM:23.05.2012
Views:2776
Downloads:289
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:EPF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:FROM CRISIS WITH FORCED SETTLEMENT IN CASE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN MARIBOR
Abstract:Various authors have different definition for company crisis. In general we could define crisis as unfavorable, undesirable, critical state in the company which is a result of both, external as well as internal causes, directly threatening it existence. Although companies are daily facing problems which can not be avoided they are able to predict al least some of them. Causes which lead company in crisis are internal and external. Many times crisis situation is caused by financial management and top management because of their insufficient and ineffective control over the finances or their inappropriate leadership style. Crisis situation can also be influenced by external factors such as: changes in industry, general economic crisis with impact on decreasing of investments. Therefore it is very important that the management of the company recognizes the symptoms and causes soon enough to take proper action in time to prevent further decline or even bankruptcy of the company. There are different types of crisis whish are defined according to their authors. Company crisis differs according to various factors such as: solvency, intensity of crisis and its manageability, threat of corporate objectives and others. Every crisis must develop into the next stage which brings either resolution or collapse. Forced settlement is one type of resolution from the company crisis. This is an action which enables the debtor to permanently improve the company financial status and continuous business. Forced settlement can bring to reduction or suspension of outstanding payments which leads to improvement of financial and economic situation as well as log term consolidation of the company. Forced settlement consists of prior and principal process. It starts with proposal which is followed by conclusion of initiation issued by the court of law. Proposal of the debtor must also include a plan for financial restructuring of the company. In order forced settlement to take place it must be approved by creditors. The worse possible scenario if not overcoming the crisis is collapse or the bankruptcy of the company. Bankruptcy should be considered as form of rescuing the company when all other forms are no longer eligible. Bankruptcy enables us to stop the companies which are continuously bringing losses. It can be initiated by proposal from debtor, creditor or shareholder of the company. Nowadays we are facing global economic recession where financial problems in almost all companies are inevitable. Construction company MTB was facing serious financial problems. Due to the unfavorable times for construction business which can no longer provide a positive cash flow, construction company MTB found itself in insuperable financial and commercial debts. Increasing debts began to cause increasing insolvency. As the company did not see any possibility to overcame this situation they proposed the initiation of forced settlement on 31.3.2010. In the following period of 30 days the creditors had file their claims and on 14.9.2010 they were called to vote for forced settlement. On 28.10.2010 forced settlement of company MTB was acknowledged with 83,41 percent. Afterwards the company was struggling their way to stay solvent but after payment of creditors was carried out, the loss started growing rapidly. Although they tried to implement certain measures of financial restructuring plan they did not succeeded in rescuing the company. Later on company had no other solution than to initiate bankruptcy proceedings. On 21.3.2011 the court of law issued their final statement on bankruptcy of MTB.
Keywords:Keywords: crisis, company crisis, construction, forced settlement, bankruptcy, financial restricting, law on financial restricting, insolvency proceedings, forced settlement proceedings


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica