| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document Help

Title:NEPRAVE STVARNE SLUŽNOSTI
Authors:ID Lovrinović, Anteja (Author)
ID Vrenčur, Renato (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Lovrinovic_Anteja_2011.pdf (527,17 KB)
MD5: 2374355376A2E49C81FB425404260F65
PID: 20.500.12556/dkum/88d20f0d-a115-4689-ad2d-170d72a30c54
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:Neprave stvarne služnosti so novost našega stvarnega prava, urejene v 226. členu Stvarnopravnega zakonika, ki jih opredeljuje kot služnosti, ki so po svoji vsebini stvarne služnosti, vendar se ustanovijo v korist določene osebe. Združujejo elemente tako stvarnih kot tudi osebnih služnosti. Subjekt upravičenja, je bodisi pravna ali fizična oseba. V primeru slednje je možna širša možnost uporabe nepravih stvarnih služnosti. Poseben primer nepravih stvarnih služnosti, so služnosti v javno korist, ki imajo izredno velik pomen na področju javnega prava. Zaradi potreb gradnje omrežij javne gospodarske infrastrukture, so pomemben faktor pri omejitvi lastninske pravice, bodisi na sporazumni ali na prisilni podlagi. V zvezi s služnostmi v javno korist je posebej pomembno vprašanja prenosa teh služnosti, saj v primeru spremembe upravljavca določenega infrastrukturnega omrežja, po veljavni splošni ureditvi v SPZ, služnost ugasne in jo je potrebno ustanoviti na novo. Tudi če ne gre za spremembo upravljavca služnost v skladu z določili o osebnih služnostih, ugasne po tridesetih letih, medtem ko so infrastrukturna omrežja dolgoročne narave in trajajo tudi več kot petdeset let. Ti problemi privedejo do stroškovnega bremena, zamudnega dela in predvsem nepotrebnih zapletov. Zato je treba to področje na novo celostno urediti z bolj natančnimi določbami v splošnih, kakor tudi v posebnih predpisih. V tej smeri sta šla že Zakon o elektronskih komunikacijah ter Energetski zakon, vendar te novitete še zdaleč niso dovolj. Potrebna je nova celostna ureditev v enotnem zakonu,saj bi to omogočilo najlažjo uporabo določil o nepravih stvarnih služnostih.Omejitev lastninske pravice v javno korist je ob upoštevanju načel mednarodnega prava možna le v določenih primerih ob izpolnjevanju določenih pogojev. Opravičilo omejitve je javni interes, ki mora biti izkazan, vendar pa se lahko omeji pravico le v obsegu, ki je potrebna za dosego javnega interesa. Gre za minimalni možen poseg, večji obseg posega predstavlja kršitev veljavnega prava in tudi možnost varstva po veljavnem pravu. Služnosti v javno korist so na splošno urejene v Zakonu o urejanju prostora ter še posebej v drugih posebnih predpisih, ki urejajo posamezno vrsto infrastrukture.
Keywords:Omejitve lastninske pravice, neprave stvarne služnosti, služnosti v javno korist, osebne služnosti, Stvarnopravni zakonik, prenos služnosti, prenehanje služnosti v javno korist, Zakon o urejanju prostora, vpisovanje nepravih stvarnih služnosti v zemljiško knjigo.
Place of publishing:Maribor
Publisher:[A. Lovrinović]
Year of publishing:2011
PID:20.500.12556/DKUM-21329 New window
UDC:34(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:4290347 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:BQYOP57A
Publication date in DKUM:22.11.2011
Views:12373
Downloads:1142
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:IRREGULAR EASTMENTS
Abstract:Irregular easements are novelty of the Slovenian property law. They are defined in article 226 of our Law of property Code, which defines them as easements with same content as easements in rem, but established as easements in personam. They combine elements of easements in rem and easements in personam. The subject of entitlement is natural or juristic person. In last case we can use Irregular easements more broaderly. Special term, which is widely used in public spfere , are easement for public benefit, which are also irregular easements. Because of the need for constructing economic network infrastrucures are easements for public benefit main factor at restrctitioning property rights, either on consensual or either on forced base. Restriction of property rights for public benefit is regard to the principles of international law possible just in particular cases taking into account conditions, which are needed. Excuse of restriction is public benefit, which must be shown in particular case. Due to public benefit, property rights can be restricted only in a way, which is necessary to achieve public interest. It is a minimum intervention, wider range of intervention is restricted and can lead to violation of applicable law and possibility of protection under existing law. These easements are settled in the Spatial Planning Act and are extra settled with special regulations, which manage particular kind of infrastructure. In the case of easement for public benefit, is of significantly importance, question of transmission of those easements. In the case when operator of public infrastructure changes, taking into account general provisions Code of property law, easements ends, so it must be established again. Even if the operator of public infrastructure doesn´ t change, easement ends after thirty years, which is due to long-lastnig infrastructure, which can last above fifty years, very inappropriate regulation. Those problems with forming new easement are cost burden, unnecessary and unneeded complications. This field of irregular easements must be regulated in complete, with detailed provisions in general Property Act as in special Acts. Act of electronic communications and Energetic Act went in this lead, but those novelties are insufficient. Comprehensive regulation in one act would be reasonable solution, because then irregular easements would be easily used.
Keywords:Restrictions of property rights, Irregular easements, easements in public benefit, easements in personam, Slovenian Property Act, transfer of the easements, the termination of the easements in the public benefit, Slovenian Spatial Planning Act, entering irregular easements in the land register.


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica