| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Show document

Title:VARSTVO OKOLJA IN PROST PRETOK BLAGA V EVROPSKI UNIJI
Authors:Klimež, Maja (Author)
Hojnik, Janja (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
Files:.pdf UNI_Klimez_Maja_2010.pdf (432,98 KB)
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis (m5)
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Abstract:V diplomski nalogi so analizirane sinergije med prostim pretokom blaga in varstvom okolja. Varstvo okolja je že dalj časa priznano kot razlog, na podlagi katerega je mogoče opravičiti odstopanja od pravil o prostem pretoku blaga v Evropski uniji, kljub temu da varstvo okolja ni bilo omenjeno v Rimski pogodbi. Precejšen prispevek razvoju prava varstva okolja je dalo Sodišče Evropske unije, ko je varstvo okolja označilo kot bistven cilj Evropske unije ter kasneje jasno izjavilo, da je varstvo okolja ena izmed obveznih zahtev. Kljub temu, da si cilji varstva okolja in prostega pretoka blaga nasprotujejo, v diplomski nalogi dokazujem, da se jih da povezati in uravnotežiti.
Keywords:Evropska unija, varstvo okolja, prost pretok blaga, ovire prostemu pretoku blaga, objektivna upravičenja, odpadna embalaža.
Year of publishing:2010
Publisher:[M. Klimež]
Source:Maribor
UDC:34(043.2)
COBISS_ID:4068139 Link is opened in a new window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UM:DK:OKTJXKBZ
Views:2193
Downloads:351
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
Categories:PF
:
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Abstract:The diploma paper discusses synergies between free movement of goods and environmental protection. Environmental protection itself has long been recognised as a justification for derogation from the European Union rules on free movement of goods, despite the fact that it was not mentioned in the Treaty of Rome. The contribution of the Court of European Union to this development was considerable when it ruled, that environmental protection was one of the essential objectives and that it is one of the mandatory requirements. I show that despite the fact, that the objectives of environmental protection oppose the free movement of goods, this two objectives can integrate and balance.
Keywords:European Union, environmental protection, free movement of goods, obstacles to free movement of goods, mandatory requirements, packaging waste.


Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica