1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. Storilnostna motivacija in izgorelost pri delu policistovAleksander Koporec Oberčkal, Damir Kocjančič, 2005, objavljeni znanstveni prispevek na konferenci Ključne besede: policija, policisti, policijsko delo, izgorelost, motivacija, pritožbe, delovna uspešnost
Objavljeno v DKUM: 21.03.2024; Ogledov: 194; Prenosov: 6
 Celotno besedilo (273,27 KB) |
8. Pregled disciplinskih postopkov in kaznivih dejanj, katerih storitve so osumljeni policisti in pritožb nad policisti v policiji med leti 1999 in 2004Damir Kocjančič, Irena Gorenak, Aleksander Koporec Oberčkal, 2005, objavljeni znanstveni prispevek na konferenci Ključne besede: policija, policisti, disciplinski postopki, pritožbe, kazniva dejanja
Objavljeno v DKUM: 21.03.2024; Ogledov: 170; Prenosov: 7
Celotno besedilo (261,92 KB) |
9. Delovanje obrambnih mehanizmov policistov v pritožbenih postopkih in njihovo ocenjevanje pritožbenega postopkaAleksander Koporec Oberčkal, Robert Šumi, Simon Vindiš, 2003, objavljeni strokovni prispevek na konferenci Ključne besede: pritožbeni postopek, policisti, obrambni mehanizem, teorije osbnosti, Freud, življenski slog, čustva, reševanje pritožb
Objavljeno v DKUM: 11.03.2024; Ogledov: 231; Prenosov: 6
Celotno besedilo (174,07 KB) |
10. Questionable research practices : an introductory reflection on causes, patterns and possible responsesGorazd Meško, Aleksander Koporec Oberčkal, 2010, pregledni znanstveni članek Opis: Purpose:
The purpose of this article is to discuss deviance in science due to increasing pressures on researchers and higher education pedagogues to be more effective and efficient in the ‘academic production’.
Design/Methods/Approach:
A literature review and reflection.
Findings:
The authors present a criminological view of deviance in science, discussing the perception of unsuitable scientific and research practices, questionable research practices, ethics and integrity in science, suitable behaviour of researchers in scientific work, and make recommendations for improving the ethics of scientific research in practice. The discussion on deviance in science is based on Merton’s principles of science (1973): the public presentation of knowledge and sharing of ideas, leading to common ownership of scientific discoveries, in which scientists disclaim their intellectual rights to their own insights in exchange for recognition and reputation. An impartial approach and universalism, in which truth is judged by impersonal, universal criteria, rather than based on race, social and economic status, sex, faith, or nationality and other subjective categories is presented and questioned. A non-profit/selfless orientation in which scientists are rewarded for selfless activities, and planned/organized scepticism – that all ideas must be tested, subject to rigorous scientific rules and public disclosure. The authors discuss these principles and connect them with scientific and research practice in Slovenia and abroad.
Research limitations/implications:
Research results are generalisable as deviance in science occurs in all cultures and have a global impact. Deviance in science is still an under-researched taboo topic and it needs to be discussed.
Practical implications:
A useful source of information for awareness raising and the improvement of quality of research work.
Originality/Value:
This paper extends understanding of possible deviance in science and factors related to such practices. The main value of this reflection is to facilitate understanding of factors of deviance in science and trigger a discussion on deviance among scientists.
Ključne besede: science, deviance, research, academic promotion standards, strain
Objavljeno v DKUM: 12.05.2020; Ogledov: 1215; Prenosov: 42
 Povezava na celotno besedilo
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
