Iskanje po katalogu digitalne knjižnice

Opis: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is frequently regarded as a private issue, with witnesses often responding accordingly. As a result, a lot of violence remains unreported, either by the victim or observers. Statistical analyses were conducted on data from an online survey of 600 respondents aged 18–65 in Slovenia. This research aimed to examine the influence of demographic factors and attitudes toward IPV on willingness to intervene or report IPV to the police. A theoretical model of intervention in IPV cases was developed and tested using structural equation modeling. The role of attitudes towards IPV as mediators between demographic variables and willingness to intervene in cases of IPV was investigated by comparing the difference in model fit between models that presumed partial and full mediation. The results supported a full mediating role of attitudes towards IPV. A full mediation model fitted the data well (SB χ2 = 765.8; df = 320; p < 0.001; SB χ2/df = 2.4; RMSEA = 0.048 (90% CI: 0.044–0.053); NFI = 0.93; NNFI = 0.95; CFI = 0.96; IFI = 0.96; SRMR = 0.08). With increasing age, and for men, the tolerance of psychological IPV increases. Men and those with lower education are more tolerant of physical IPV. Individuals with higher tolerance for physical or psychological IPV were less likely to intervene or contact the police, and more likely to remain passive. Perceptions of police effectiveness were not related to willingness to intervene. The findings emphasize the pivotal role of attitudes towards IPV, underscoring the importance of raising awareness of the phenomenon and encouraging individuals to “break the silence” by reporting it to the police.
Ključne besede: intimate partner violence, women, victims, attitudes towards intimate partner violence, willingness to report
Objavljeno v DKUM: 04.12.2025; Ogledov: 0; Prenosov: 4
Povezava na datoteko

Opis: Svet okoli sebe zaznavamo in interpretiramo v skladu s svojimi vrednotami, normami, izkušnjami in pričakovanji. Pozorni smo na za nas zanimive stvari, dogajanja ali pojave. Vso zaznavanje pa, brez da bi ga shranili v spomin, ne bi imelo nikakršnega smisla in pomena. Vprašajmo se, kakšno bi bilo življenje brez spomina. Ljudje smo čuječa bitja, tako nas poleg spomina odlikujejo tudi drugi kognitivni procesi, kot sta učenje in mišljenje. Vsi ti procesi so povezani s čustvovanjem, ki velja za enega najosebnejših in subjektivnih procesov. S čustvi vsak posameznik odraža vrednostni odnos do samega sebe in zunanjega sveta. Napake spomina so nekaj povsem normalnega, razumljivega in same po sebi, v toku vsakdanjega življenja, niso usodne. Problem nastane, kadar imajo čustva ali drugi dejavniki zaznavanja vpliv na spomin pri dogodkih, kjer priče dogodke (re)konstruirajo popolnoma drugače, kot so se zgodili in zaradi tega pride do obsodb nedolžnih oseb. Kadar ni materialnih dokazov, so lahko priče edini vir informacij, pri tem pa se moramo vprašati, ali so podane informacije verodostojne in kredibilne. Pomemben vpliv pri tem ima tudi pravilna izvedba intervjuja in čas, v katerem je ta izveden. Diplomska naloga se osredotoča na spomin (vrste spomina, spominske napake), čustva in pričanje očividcev ter na povezanost med slednjimi pojmi. Predstavljena pa je tudi eksperimentalna manipulacija čustev. V nalogi so postavljene hipoteze, ki so naše domneve in smo jih skozi pregled literature bodisi potrdili bodisi ovrgli. Ugotovili smo, da na spomin vplivajo tako pozitivne kot tudi negativne emocije, kako velik vpliv ima, kam je usmerjena pozornost očividca ter da informacije, s katerimi so priče seznanjene po dogodku, resnično vplivajo na spomine prič in njihovo poznejše pričanje.
Ključne besede: priče, čustva, spomin, spominske napake, diplomske naloge
Objavljeno v DKUM: 09.09.2022; Ogledov: 1161; Prenosov: 208
Celotno besedilo (949,50 KB)