1. Diversity of Enforcement Titles in Cross-border Debt Collection in the EU : National Report: CiprusDespina Christophi, Demetra Loizou, 2022 Opis: Applying a systematic approach, this report addressess the main features of enfrocement titles in Cyprus. It focuses on judgments, court settlements and notarial deeds, scrutinizing their content, form and effects. It conveys theoretical insight into the subject matter as well as conclusions from relevant case law.
Ključne besede: enforcement title, cross-border enforcement, Italy, EU law, civil procedure law
Objavljeno v DKUM: 20.12.2022; Ogledov: 97; Prenosov: 13
 Celotno besedilo (4,00 MB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
2. Diversity of Enforcement Titles in Cross-border Debt Collection in the EU : National Report: ItalyMaria Kaczorowska, Alessia Voinich, Martina Previatello, 2022 Opis: Applying a systematic approach, this report addressess the main features of enfrocement titles in Italy. It focuses on judgments, court settlements and notarial deeds, scrutinizing their content, form and effects. It conveys theoretical insight into the subject matter as well as conclusions from relevant case law.
Ključne besede: enforcement title, cross-border enforcement, italy, EU law, civil procedure law
Objavljeno v DKUM: 20.12.2022; Ogledov: 91; Prenosov: 12
Celotno besedilo (5,82 MB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
3. Mobilna aplikacija za sledenje pošiljk : diplomsko deloTim Simonič, 2022, diplomsko delo Opis: Namen diplomske naloge je bil izdelati mobilno aplikacijo za sledenje pošiljk. Skozi razvoj mobilne aplikacije smo naredili pomožni program, s pomočjo katerega smo lažje vnašali podatke v podatkovno bazo, postavili podatkovno bazo, v katero smo shranjevali podatke in procedure, napisali API in uporabili programsko orodje ngrok ter naredili mobilno aplikacijo.
Ključne besede: C#, Java, SQL, procedure, API.
Objavljeno v DKUM: 08.11.2022; Ogledov: 218; Prenosov: 58
Celotno besedilo (2,14 MB) |
4. |
5. Complaints against the Slovenian police : on the problem of independence and procedural impartialityBenjamin Flander, 2020, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: Purpose: The paper focuses on the problem of independence and impartiality of the complaints procedure against police work in Slovenia. Relying on the findings of the targeted research project, we address and examine the concerns regarding the adequacy of the current format and indicate the possibilities for legislative changes and reform. Design/Methods/Approach: We carried out an analysis of the legal regulation of the complaints procedure regarding the work of police officers and the results of previous research in the field. Based on the findings, we conducted a structured interview with a general questionnaire in written form and oral interviews with the people who perform the complaints procedures. Findings: The current regulation of complaints has advantages and disadvantages. According to the interviewees and in line with a wider professional consensus, complaints procedures should in future be carried out outside the Ministry of the Interior ("the Ministry") and the police. This would mean that complaints procedures would gain what they lack at present, namely the appearance of impartiality and formal/institutional independence. Research Limitations/Implications: In our research, we interviewed employees of the Ministry and representatives of the public who are involved in proceedings before the complaints panels of the Ministry. In future research, other participants (e.g. the complainants and police officers) should also be interviewed for a more comprehensive view of the issue. Originality/Value: We examined the views of the employees of the Ministry who carry out complaints procedures in order to establish the validity of concerns regarding the adequacy of current regulation and we indicated the possibilities for reform of the current procedures.
Ključne besede: complaints against police work, procedure, independence, impartiality, Slovenia
Objavljeno v DKUM: 11.06.2021; Ogledov: 683; Prenosov: 21
 Povezava na celotno besedilo |
6. The current status of the preclusive effects of judgments in the federal court system of the United States of AmericaThomas Allan Heller, 2020, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: Res judicata law in the United States of America has a long, extensive and complex history. The aim of this paper is to provide at least a working summary of some of the most important aspects of the current res judicata law in the federal court system of the United States. The flexible discovery, pleading and joinder rules have given rise to more expansive res judicata law. The paper will discuss what exactly constitutes a judgment; how the federal courts deal with finality of judgments in multiple party and multiple claim cases; the final judgment rule; the form of judgments; the methods to enter judgments and significance of entry of judgments; together with a detailed overview of the doctrine of res judicata itself, including the separate, but related twin doctrines of claim preclusion and issue preclusion.
Ključne besede: res judicata, merger and bar, claim preclusion, issue preclusion, collateral estoppel, finality of judgments, US Federal District Courts, civil procedure
Objavljeno v DKUM: 15.01.2021; Ogledov: 423; Prenosov: 0 |
7. The standards of proof in medical malpractice casesNina Cek, 2020, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: The article examines the procedural aspect of medical malpractice cases. It focuses on the differences in standards of proof by first explaining the characteristics of the Slovenian legal system and then comparing it with German and English legal systems. The author sheds light on the approach of the EU court on the question of the responsibility of the manufacturer for the product (vaccine) and suggests the direction to use a broader framework for the evaluation of evidence and presumptions. Given the disclosed problems of proving through the help of a medical expert, the article emphasizes the importance of respect for human rights in civil proceedings. Particular emphasis is also placed on no-fault systems and the question is raised of how the introduction of such a system into the Slovenian legal system would affect the perceived problem of proving a medical error and informed consent omission.
Ključne besede: medical malpractice, expert evidence, standards of proof, no-fault system, civil procedure rules
Objavljeno v DKUM: 15.01.2021; Ogledov: 420; Prenosov: 29
Povezava na datoteko |
8. International surrogacy arrangements - perspectives on international regulationJasmina Alihodžić, Anita Duraković, 2020, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: Although more than 30 years have passed since the birth of the first surrogate baby, surrogacy motherhood as a form of ART is still one of the most controversial issues that reflect moral, ethical, cultural, psychological, medical, economic and legal dilemmas. The juxtaposition of legal solutions at the national level has given rise to discussions on the optimal solutions for regulating model international surrogacy arrangements. Given the current social and political climate, the authors of this paper advocate for the reform of international adoption procedures as opposed to passing a new convention, in a way that respective provisions of international adoption convention should be adapted to capture the effects of international surrogacy arrangements - recognition of legal parentage, provided that it is in the best interests of the child, and that there is a biological link between the child and at least one intended parent.
Ključne besede: international surrogacy arrangements, international regulation, reform of international adoption procedure, recognition of legal parentage, best interest of the child
Objavljeno v DKUM: 15.01.2021; Ogledov: 383; Prenosov: 48
Povezava na datoteko |
9. General principles in European small claims procedure : how far can simplifications go?Bettina Nunner-Krautgasser, Philipp Anzenberger, 2012, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: The European Small Claims Regulation has been offering an alternative proceeding for small claims litigation in cross-border cases for almost four years now. Along with several important procedural simplifications, however, came considerable restrictions regarding the principles of public and oral proceedings established in the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Critics claim especially that the court’s power to omit any oral hearing in a Small Claims Procedure cannot fulfill the requirements of the Convention and the Charter. This question is going to be further investigated in the course of this paper. Before doing so, however, a rough overview of the scope, of some general principals and of the conduct of the European Small Claims Procedure shall be provided.
Ključne besede: European Small Claims Procedure, procedural simplifications, written procedure, principle of public proceedings, principle of oral proceedings, compliance
Objavljeno v DKUM: 01.08.2018; Ogledov: 724; Prenosov: 47
Celotno besedilo (206,61 KB) |
10. |
