1. A general overview of enforcement in civil and commercial matters in MacedoniaTatjana Zoroska-Kamilovska, Milka Rakočević, 2015, pregledni znanstveni članek Opis: The paper discusses one of the currently most relevant topics in the area of civil law protection in the Republic of Macedonia. In 2005 Macedonia made a drastic step in reforming the system of civil enforcement: the previous court-oriented system of enforcement was replaced with the bailiff-oriented system. The enforcement procedure has ceased of being under the jurisdiction of the court and the enforcement was entrusted to enforcement agents - persons with public authorizations established by law, who conduct the enforcement. With the introduction of the new system of civil enforcement Macedonia strove to eliminate all dysfunctionalities of the system due to the slowness and the inefficiency of the enforcement procedure, which seriously affected the proper administration of justice. The paper gives a general overview regarding the Macedonian civil enforcement system with special emphasis on certain issues that are considered to be of major importance, such as the reforms that were implemented or being implemented regarding the system of civil enforcement, the legal basis of enforcement, the status and role of the enforcement agents in the legal system of the Republic Macedonia, the institutional framework, structure and order of the enforcement proceedings, the enforcement titles, as well as the issue regarding the means of enforcement and the distinction between enforcement and security measures.
Ključne besede: civil enforcement, enforcement agent, forcible execution, enforcement titles
Objavljeno v DKUM: 02.08.2018; Ogledov: 1001; Prenosov: 117
 Celotno besedilo (485,10 KB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
2. Interim measures in arbitration proceedings : facing the challenge to amend teh Macedonian arbitration legislationTatjana Zoroska-Kamilovska, Tatjana Shterjova, Univerza v Mariboru, 2013, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: Interim measures in arbitration proceedings are intended to provide protection of the parties’ rights in the course of the proceedings before the final award is rendered. This issue for a long time has been regarded to be rooted in public policy concerns, but gradually this power is being transferred to the arbitral tribunal itself. In the Republic of Macedonia, the issue of interim measures in international commercial arbitration is regulated in the Law on International Commercial Arbitration. The provisions of the law expressly provide for the power of the arbitral tribunal to grant interim measures, however many questions in regard of arbitral interim relief are left unsettled. The authors give an analysis of the currents state over this issue in the Republic of Macedonia, and make an attempt to provide a solid answer to the question – will the amended provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration be a good basis to overcome the perceived problems, or an approach similar to the Slovenian should be rather accepted.
Ključne besede: arbitration proceedings, concurrent jurisdiction, enforcement, interim relief, interim measures, preliminary orders, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Objavljeno v DKUM: 01.08.2018; Ogledov: 1316; Prenosov: 48
Celotno besedilo (402,04 KB) |
3. Rešavanje prethodnog pitanja u vanparničnom postupku Republike MakedonijeArsen Janevski, Tatjana Zoroska-Kamilovska, 2010, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: Reševanje predhodnih vprašanj v nepravdnem postopku Republike Makedonije
Avtorja analizirata pravila za reševanje vprašanja za predhodno odločanje v nepravdnem postopku v Republiki Makedoniji in navajata, da se režim reševanja teh vprašanj v nepravnih postopkih razlikuje od režima v pravdnem postopku. Ker so nepravdni postopki zelo heterogeni, vsebuje Zakon o nepravdnem postopku Republike Makedonije iz leta 2008 poleg splošnih pravil za reševanje vprašanj za predhodno odločanje tudi posebna pravila v določenih postopkih. Splošno pravilo pooblašča nepravdno sodišče, da samo reši predhodno vprašanje, če o zadevnem vprašanju pristojni organ še ni dokončno odločil. Lahko pa tudi prekine postopek in počaka, da se vprašanje reši v sodnem ali upravnem postopku. Ker nepravdni postopek ni najbolj prilagojen reševanju sporov med strankami, je nepravdno sodišče v primeru spornih dejstev, povezanih s predhodnim vprašanjem, dolžno glede reševanje le-teh napotiti stranke na pravdo. Avtorja prav tako analizirata še posebna pravila Zakona o nepravdnem postopku Republike Makedonije za rešitev vprašanja za predhodno odločanje v lastninskopravnih razmerjih.
Ključne besede: civilno procesno pravo, pravdni postopek, nepravdni postopek, Makedonija
Objavljeno v DKUM: 23.07.2018; Ogledov: 1491; Prenosov: 70
Celotno besedilo (99,78 KB) |
