| | SLO | ENG | Cookies and privacy

Bigger font | Smaller font

Search the digital library catalog Help

Query: search in
search in
search in
search in
* old and bologna study programme

Options:
  Reset


1 - 10 / 41
First pagePrevious page12345Next pageLast page
1.
Professional qualifications recognition of doctors in the EU : a perspective of EU citizens and third-country nationals
Živa Šuta, Karmen Pišek Šuta, 2023, original scientific article

Abstract: This article explores the applicable rules in the context of professional qualifications recognition of doctors in the EU. In the pursuit of this examination, it focuses on two groups of individuals, namely EU citizens and third-country nationals, and differentiates between qualifications obtained in the EU and qualifications obtained outside EU. While EU citizens are generally free to pursue their medical profession in any EU Member State, third-country nationals experience difficulties in the recognition of their professional qualifications as they fall outside the scope of specific rules on professional qualifications recognition and do not enjoy free movement rights. The assessment of the applicable rules is followed by a conclusion that the EU citizens are protected under the EU legal framework for the recognition of professional qualifications, however, the legal framework for the recognition of foreign professional qualifications is still absent and depends largely upon general rules applicable to third-country nationals willing to settle and work in the EU.
Keywords: professional qualifications, mutual recognition, freedom of establishment, brain waste, doctors
Published in DKUM: 19.04.2024; Views: 258; Downloads: 23
.pdf Full text (464,32 KB)
This document has many files! More...

2.
3.
4.
Subspecialisation in radiology in Europe, a survey of the accreditation council of imaging
Mitja Rupreht, Paolo Ricci, Helmut Prosch, Miraude Adriaensen, 2023, original scientific article

Abstract: Background To provide an overview of existing Subspecialty Exams and Diplomas in Radiology and their endorsement as well as to providing an insight into the status of subspecialisation in radiology in Europe. The European Training Curriculum for Subspecialisation in Radiology mentions thirteen fields of subspecialisation within radiology. The websites of the corresponding subspecialty societies were checked for Subspecialty Exams and Diplomas. In addition, we performed a survey among European radiologists regarding subspecialisation in radiology. Results Ten out of 13 European subspecialty societies offer a European subspecialty diploma. At least 7 out of the 10 European subspecialties societies in radiology offering a European subspecialty diploma obtained European Society of Radiology (ESR) endorsement. Two out of 10 obtained European Union of Medical Specialists—Council of European Specialist Medical Assessment endorsement. Survey among European radiologists who were ESR full members in March 2021 demonstrated that almost 20% of respondents indicated that they have no subspecialisation. Another 15% indicated that their area of subspecialisation is not recognised in their country of work. Eighty-four percent of respondents would like their area of subspecialisation in radiology to be officially recognised. According to the respondents, the major benefit of having their subspecialisation in radiology officially recognised is personal interest (45%). Conclusions There is a desire for more subspecialty recognition in radiology among European radiologists. Therefore, European subspecialty diplomas in radiology fulfil a need. Furthermore, there is room for further harmonisation and implementation on a European level regarding subspecialty training and recognition in radiology. Critical relevance statement As there is a desire for more subspecialty recognition in radiology among European radiologists, European subspecialty diplomas in radiology fulfil a need and there is still room for further harmonisation and implementation on a European level regarding subspecialty training in radiology.
Keywords: subspecialisation, radiology, European subspecialty diploma, recognition, harmonisation
Published in DKUM: 18.03.2024; Views: 192; Downloads: 9
.pdf Full text (2,74 MB)
This document has many files! More...
This document is also a collection of 1 document!

5.
The cross-border enforcement of court settlements within Brussels Ia Regulation : from a European and an Austrian perspective
Philipp Anzenberger, 2020, original scientific article

Abstract: Despite the enormous practical relevance of court settlements, the Brussels Ia Regulation contains only a few explicit provisions for the cross-border enforcement of this legal instrument. This can cause difficulties in borderline cases, for example when it is doubtful whether the legal act in question is to be classified as a settlement or a judgment or which specific European regulation is applicable to a settlement containing several different claims. This paper provides a general overview of the rules for the enforcement of court settlements under the Brussels Ia Regulation and examines some problems that may specifically arise in the case of cross-border enforcement of court settlements.
Keywords: court settlement, Brussels Ia Regulation, cross-border enforcement, recognition, scope, judgment, certificate, exequatur
Published in DKUM: 15.01.2021; Views: 798; Downloads: 0

6.
Provisional security of creditors in cross-border civil and commercial matters
Neža Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, 2020, original scientific article

Abstract: Provisional measures can be of utmost importance to creditors especially in relationships with a cross-border element. The Regulation 1215/2012 is the legal source that provides rules regarding the jurisdiction to issue a provisional measure but also offers imperfect provisions regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional measures issued in other Member States of the European Union. Due to the inadequate regulation, CJEU case law has played an important role, but nevertheless the article finds and opens new questions that have not yet been answered.
Keywords: Regulation 44/2001, Regulation 1215/2012, provisional measure, jurisdiction, recognition, enforcement, arbitration clause, real connecting link
Published in DKUM: 15.01.2021; Views: 856; Downloads: 0

7.
International surrogacy arrangements - perspectives on international regulation
Jasmina Alihodžić, Anita Duraković, 2020, original scientific article

Abstract: Although more than 30 years have passed since the birth of the first surrogate baby, surrogacy motherhood as a form of ART is still one of the most controversial issues that reflect moral, ethical, cultural, psychological, medical, economic and legal dilemmas. The juxtaposition of legal solutions at the national level has given rise to discussions on the optimal solutions for regulating model international surrogacy arrangements. Given the current social and political climate, the authors of this paper advocate for the reform of international adoption procedures as opposed to passing a new convention, in a way that respective provisions of international adoption convention should be adapted to capture the effects of international surrogacy arrangements - recognition of legal parentage, provided that it is in the best interests of the child, and that there is a biological link between the child and at least one intended parent.
Keywords: international surrogacy arrangements, international regulation, reform of international adoption procedure, recognition of legal parentage, best interest of the child
Published in DKUM: 15.01.2021; Views: 710; Downloads: 58
URL Link to file

8.
The principle of mutual recognition in the area of freedom security and justice : magistrsko delo
Mihael Pojbič, 2019, master's thesis

Abstract: Mutual recognition in the EU is both a goal and a principle in of itself, constructed and operationalised through individual provisions. The principle of mutual recognition is regarded as fundamental in enabling cooperation between Member States both in civil and criminal matters. The principle of mutual recognition has long ago outgrown the Internal Market and seeped through into judicial matters between Member States in the AFSJ. The accompanying realisation that the EU is not just an economic area is therefore evident. Since the inception of the idea of a Europe free of classical border checks facilitating freedom of movement was manifested, the fear of circumventing the application of judicial decisions became evermore real. Therefore, monumental changes in the fields of international criminal and international private law were expected and implemented in the European union (EU), through the principle of mutual trust and mutual recognition. Subsequently, classical concepts of private international and international criminal law gave way to Europeanised concepts of exequatur, the public policy exception, the principle of reciprocity, the principle of double criminality and the principle of specialty to name a few. It should be noted that these rules had been reserved to be enacted by the Member States. However, by loosening those principles the guarantees and freedoms which they either explicitly or implicitly guard are in danger of being sidestepped in order to enable mutual recognition. Therefore, at the forefront of the debate of mutual recognition of judicial decisions is the question of protecting fundamental rights and legal principles enshrined both in European and domestic legislation of the Member States. The balancing act that the EU preforms has to be careful enough to facilitate mutual recognition while not jeopardizing mutual trust between Member States. Today both EU private international law and EU criminal law work on the basis of the provisions which facilitate mutual recognition and limit it within the AFSJ. Since the basic idea behind mutual recognition is the same, i.e. free movement of judicial decisions, both their manifestations and their limits should strive to respect the basic framework of the field of law form which they stand. While the principle of mutual recognition has been slowly and methodically evolving, there is a sense of urgency with the development of the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters.
Keywords: The principle of mutual recognition, European arrest warrant, Exequatur, Surrender, General principles of EU law, Recognition and enforcement of judgements, double criminality
Published in DKUM: 17.12.2019; Views: 1386; Downloads: 174
.pdf Full text (885,55 KB)

9.
Interpreting Intent in Informal Written Communication
Rene Slatinjek, 2019, master's thesis

Abstract: Communication has evolved through history using different channels, developing language systems, understanding the communication structure and recognizing the difference between syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Language is ever-changing. In the modern era, written communication has evolved into a quick response pace, invoking new properties we can observe, understand and use. The main objective of this M.A. thesis is to investigate the new pragmatic features that have developed in informal written communication. One of the most prominent developments in written communication in recent times is the implementation and integration of non-verbal elements.
Keywords: pragmatics, intention recognition, informal communication, communication betterment
Published in DKUM: 12.12.2019; Views: 1338; Downloads: 91
.pdf Full text (1,11 MB)

10.
Search done in 0.2 sec.
Back to top
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica